|
|
| Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss (851651) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (852204) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Pablo M 201 on Tue Nov 3 22:00:22 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 3 21:00:57 2009. No, not all stations.The stations that are just about 7 car lengths are: Harrison Pavonia-Newport Hoboken Christopher Street 9th Street 14th Street 23rd Street 33rd Street (Majority of the system I know, sue me) |
|
|
| (852206) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 3 22:05:26 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Pablo M 201 on Tue Nov 3 22:00:22 2009. D'oh sorry, I meant: What's the longest train they can run that will fit in every Path station? |
|
|
| (852207) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 3 22:05:54 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Pablo M 201 on Tue Nov 3 22:00:22 2009. Thanks for the info though. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (852208) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 3 22:10:11 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 12:13:14 2009. Agreed, connection of the SIRT to NJ is much more plausable imo than to the rest of the NYC subway system. |
|
|
| (852209) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 3 22:10:23 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 3 22:10:11 2009. *imo |
|
|
| (852364) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Pablo M 201 on Wed Nov 4 09:06:55 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 3 22:05:26 2009. 7 cars the most. |
|
|
| (852375) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Wed Nov 4 09:43:58 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Pablo M 201 on Tue Nov 3 21:57:15 2009. Only Harrison and Grove need to be extended as they can only hold eight cars. Other stops on the WTC - NWK can have ten car trains. EXP was reconfigured post 9/11 from seven cars to ten. They used to run eight car trains on that run with the front car not opening at EXP in one (maybe both, I forgot) direction. |
|
|
| (852420) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Nov 4 11:29:33 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Pablo M 201 on Wed Nov 4 09:06:55 2009. Thanks. |
|
|
| (852489) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by ebtmikado on Wed Nov 4 15:33:50 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 3 09:21:13 2009. I know that at one time, PATH (H&M) was considered a railroad, and fell under the jurisdiction of the ICC and FRA. It was listed in the Official Guide of the Railways. Lee |
|
|
| (852492) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Nov 4 15:41:56 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by pablo m 201 on Tue Nov 3 15:09:29 2009. Thanks for the info. I'm going to try to ride a PA5 within the next two weeks. |
|
|
| (852506) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Wed Nov 4 16:07:18 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by arnine on Tue Nov 3 13:17:34 2009. To me the black face on NYCT's NTTs is their most unattractive feature. I would much rather a plain silver colored front like the GOHed R-44s through 46s and the R-62s. |
|
|
| (852540) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Wed Nov 4 17:38:18 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by ebtmikado on Wed Nov 4 15:33:50 2009. PATH Is still a RR Rionone posted the proof yesterday |
|
|
| (852542) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Wed Nov 4 17:42:48 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by randyo on Wed Nov 4 16:07:18 2009. I agree excep the ones on the R142's I do not mind those faces as it has some color, but the R143/R160 Uggggly |
|
|
| (852598) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Nov 4 20:10:17 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 12:22:53 2009. Sure would've been nicer if they had a small space between seats for the arms space. Like what if a person has a wider upperbody than a lower one? Seats should not be that close together imo. |
|
|
| (852605) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Nov 4 20:15:08 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by arnine on Tue Nov 3 13:17:34 2009. If the R143/160's had seats like the R32 [anything without the damn lump] it would've been much better. I prefer bench seats over bucket ones. |
|
|
| (852622) | |
Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Wed Nov 4 20:53:20 2009, in response to Re: PA-5's kick R160 @ss, posted by rionOne on Tue Nov 3 14:08:15 2009. I like both as well. The one thing I do think would have made it better on the R160s would have been a nice color on there front, something like the R142's. The R160s are just to black for my taste. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
