|
|
| Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again (847326) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (847820) | |
Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 24 21:52:34 2009, in response to Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again, posted by Ken S. on Sat Oct 24 21:20:23 2009. Not one positive response to Chippers post and yet cuntberg singles mine out for his nasty little shithead retort. |
|
|
| (847836) | |
Re: The NYCT illiterate old fart Speaks Again |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Oct 24 22:05:40 2009, in response to Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again, posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 24 21:52:34 2009. Yours wasn't singled out you big illiterate horse's ass. |
|
|
| (847839) | |
Re: Here We Go Again..... |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Oct 24 22:07:24 2009, in response to Re: Here We Go Again....., posted by Ken S. on Sat Oct 24 21:00:15 2009. You dumbass - Train Dude makes it very clear where he works. I do not. See the difference? I doubt it... |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (847849) | |
So Says Son of Chicken Plucker |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 24 22:15:24 2009, in response to Re: The NYCT illiterate old fart Speaks Again, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Oct 24 22:05:40 2009. You sound desperate cuntberg. |
|
|
| (847899) | |
Re: Off topic is not working (for me anyway). |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sat Oct 24 22:59:03 2009, in response to Re: Off topic is not working (for me anyway)., posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 24 19:13:18 2009. I can get OT to load in Compressed eventually, I just have to pound on it a few times :) Varies, some days (like tonight) loads first thing, other times, multiple reloads. Dunno. Obviously, Larry can't or won't fix the problem w/ OT, so I just deal. |
|
|
| (847930) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by Jeromeline on Sun Oct 25 00:27:18 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by Railman718 on Fri Oct 23 14:52:46 2009. Pom Poms? Where did he get Pom Poms? I want Pom Poms!!!! |
|
|
| (847945) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 01:17:39 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Oct 24 19:25:13 2009. we'll see later tonite. |
|
|
| (847946) | |
Re: Off topic is not working (for me anyway). |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 01:18:32 2009, in response to Re: Off topic is not working (for me anyway)., posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sat Oct 24 22:59:03 2009. yeah, it became too much of a hassle over a while. That's why i just stick with chrono for both O/T and buschat. |
|
|
| (848006) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 08:37:26 2009, in response to Let's Go Angels., posted by Chipper10 on Fri Oct 23 13:49:51 2009. ANGELS-YANKEES: Rain delay could reap benefits for L.A.By Jill Painter, Staff Writer Posted: 10/24/2009 06:47:53 PM PDT NEW YORK - For once, the Angels could reap benefits from inclement weather. A steady rain that caused large puddles to form all along Yankee Stadium's warning track postponed Saturday's Game 6 of the American League Championship Series until 5:20 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time today. The Angels are down 3-2 in the best-of-seven series, but if they win today and force a Game 7, ace John Lackey will almost certainly earn the start on three days' rest. CC Sabathia already is scheduled to pitch for the third time in the series, and Sabathia has baffled the Angels twice in winning Games1 and 4. "Obviously, I want to be in games as often as I can be," Lackey said. A Game 7 pitting the aces against one another for the right to advance to the World Series is tantalizing - unless you're Yankees manager Joe Girardi. The Angels would not be able to start Lackey without the postponement. "You worry about Game 6 for us," Girardi said. "Our focus is completely on Game 6. Does it give one team an advantage or not? I don't know. Maybe the extra day helps us more. I'm not really sure." Lackey watched some college football Saturday before going to the ballpark, and he said he was going to watch USC's game against Oregon State later that night. It's clear the Angels are still basking in the momentum created by their 7-6 comeback win in Game 5 that sent the series into this drizzling mess. Torii Hunter would have rather been playing, but he joked about how he might spend his day. "(Today), it's supposed to be sunny," Hunter said. "That will give me a chance to work on my tan here in New York." There wasn't much time for managers and players to play the will-we-play or won't-we-play game Saturday since the game was called by Major League Baseball at about 6 p.m. Eastern time. Joe Saunders and Andy Pettitte were both scheduled to start Saturday, and both are still scheduled to pitch today. Girardi could have opted to start Sabathia on regular rest but stuck with Pettitte. It rained here Friday night and steadily all day Saturday and into the night, cramming subways with people, causing delays and jamming traffic. Forecasters have predicted sun and 60-degree temperatures for today and Monday, should there be a Game 7. "We've got to get there first," Lackey said. "I'll be available (today). That's all I know." Angels general manager Tony Reagins informed Angels manager Mike Scioscia about the cancellation while he was talking to reporters before the game. "This changes things," Reagins said. "It gives us more options. Our bullpen is refreshed ... In theory, we could (start Lackey). We haven't had that discussion yet. I'm sure that will be a topic." Jeff Mathis wouldn't have minded playing in the rain Saturday. He grew up in Florida after all, where it rains often. "I've been around it all my life," Mathis said. "It stinks (to play baseball in it) because every time the ball hits the ground it gets wet ... As a kid, everybody loves playing in it." The former high school quarterback ran the option in high school, so rain didn't bother him. Hunter was disappointed there was no game, but he understood. "Trust me, if we hate the rainout I'm sure the Yankees hate it," Hunter said. "We're feeling pretty good, and we wanted to keep it going." |
|
|
| (848069) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 11:03:03 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 08:37:26 2009. :yawn: The Angels don't have the benefit of a momentum from game 5.It's a clean slate for both teams. |
|
|
| (848147) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 14:08:05 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 11:03:03 2009. even if the angels loose i wont feel so badready for next year |
|
|
| (848151) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by 9 local on Sun Oct 25 14:13:50 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by Kriston Lewis on Fri Oct 23 19:59:54 2009. I wonder what happened to him. |
|
|
| (848153) | |
Re: F*** the Angels. |
|
|
Posted by 9 local on Sun Oct 25 14:14:37 2009, in response to Let's Go Angels., posted by Chipper10 on Fri Oct 23 13:49:51 2009. This is off topic anyway, but see subject. |
|
|
| (848166) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 14:47:12 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 14:08:05 2009. there ya go :) |
|
|
| (848186) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 16:07:51 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 14:47:12 2009. i appreciate what they did this year it was excitingeven if today they dont make it |
|
|
| (848191) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 16:23:49 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 16:07:51 2009. they've been a pain in the ass and hey they finally beat Boston for a change. that's something to be proud of. |
|
|
| (848199) | |
Re: Here We Go Again..... |
|
|
Posted by Clayton on Sun Oct 25 16:49:28 2009, in response to Re: Here We Go Again....., posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Oct 24 22:07:24 2009. WGAF |
|
|
| (848200) | |
Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again |
|
|
Posted by Clayton on Sun Oct 25 16:50:29 2009, in response to The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again, posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 24 21:05:35 2009.  Weinberg in 20 years. |
|
|
| (848206) | |
Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Sun Oct 25 16:55:18 2009, in response to Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again, posted by Clayton on Sun Oct 25 16:50:29 2009. Some cars Weinberg should take a ride in the backseat of. |
|
|
| (848218) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 17:51:42 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by Grand Concourse on Sun Oct 25 16:23:49 2009. yes it is now 2 more games to go ( hopefully ) |
|
|
| (848271) | |
Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again |
|
|
Posted by lrg5784 on Sun Oct 25 20:16:30 2009, in response to Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again, posted by Clayton on Sun Oct 25 16:50:29 2009. LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! |
|
|
| (848272) | |
Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again |
|
|
Posted by lrg5784 on Sun Oct 25 20:16:57 2009, in response to Re: The Stantec Office Boy Speaks Again, posted by Ken S. on Sun Oct 25 16:55:18 2009. X-D |
|
|
| (848377) | |
Re: Let's Go Angels. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 23:53:50 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 17:51:42 2009. Congrads to the Yankees ...Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 23:52:52 2009 Congrads to the Yankees ... it looks like the angels are looking to next year |
|
|
| (848379) | |
AMTRAK SERIES '09 |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Mon Oct 26 00:04:16 2009, in response to Let's Go Angels., posted by Chipper10 on Fri Oct 23 13:49:51 2009. Fixed. |
|
|
| (848380) | |
Re: AMTRAK SERIES '09 |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Mon Oct 26 00:19:38 2009, in response to AMTRAK SERIES '09, posted by Kriston Lewis on Mon Oct 26 00:04:16 2009. WHOOT! |
|
|
| (848381) | |
Yankees win! [was let's go angels] |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Mon Oct 26 00:20:20 2009, in response to Re: Let's Go Angels., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 25 23:53:50 2009. Yeah! Bring on the phillies! |
|
|
| (848386) | |
Re: AMTRAK SERIES '09 |
|
|
Posted by Fulton Frank on Mon Oct 26 00:33:07 2009, in response to AMTRAK SERIES '09, posted by Kriston Lewis on Mon Oct 26 00:04:16 2009. Do SEPTA R7, NJT NEC and NYT D train for a fraction of the $$$$ |
|
|
| (848388) | |
Re: AMTRAK SERIES '09 |
|
|
Posted by Fulton Frank on Mon Oct 26 00:33:22 2009, in response to AMTRAK SERIES '09, posted by Kriston Lewis on Mon Oct 26 00:04:16 2009. Do SEPTA R7, NJT NEC and NYT D train for a fraction of the $$$$Go Yanks! |
|
|
| (848390) | |
Re: AMTRAK SERIES '09 |
|
|
Posted by 9 local on Mon Oct 26 00:34:42 2009, in response to Re: AMTRAK SERIES '09, posted by Fulton Frank on Mon Oct 26 00:33:22 2009. Or, even cheaper, NJT NEC, RiverLINE, and PATCO |
|
|
| (848396) | |
Re: AMTRAK SERIES '09 |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Oct 26 00:39:25 2009, in response to AMTRAK SERIES '09, posted by Kriston Lewis on Mon Oct 26 00:04:16 2009. Aw yeah, fuck Phillies! |
|
|
| (848397) | |
Re: Angels Kaput. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 26 00:40:37 2009, in response to Let's Go Angels., posted by Chipper10 on Fri Oct 23 13:49:51 2009. Maybe posting this on the wrong forum jinxed 'em . . . ? |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
