| Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN (802645) | |
|
|
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
| (803193) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Wed Jul 1 14:53:56 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Easy on Tue Jun 30 22:21:32 2009. Even if that were the case, every time the employee was denied a promotion he could bring an action that such denial was retaliatory for having prevailed in a legal action and it would then be up to the agency to prove otherwise. My father had a similar situation with the Dept of Correction in which the agency head appointed a crony to a top level position which was competitive and required an exam. My father took the case to court and the agency was forced to hold an exam and my father placed higher on the list than the hack who was holding the job provisionally and got the job. The agency didn't dare use the "one in three" rule since it would have been so patently obvious that denying my father the position would have been prima facie evidence of retaliation. Also, since the plaintiff's case has achieved media attention, the last thing the MTA would want is any more unfavorable publicity than it already has. |
|
| (803196) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Wed Jul 1 15:04:32 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Jul 1 10:59:14 2009. IAWTP. Also, although the plaintiff may end up settling the suit for a much smaller amount than demanded, one of the main reasons for large monetary settlements is to severely punish the miscreants with more that just a slap on the wrist. The idea is to give a swift sure and severe kick in the butt that will not soon be forgotten. I would also like to add that in a similar position, I would also make, as part of such a lawsuit, a demand that the offending officer or officers be terminated from the PD and be denied the right to become any type of law enforcement officer or even a security guard for at least a significant period of time if not permanently. |
|
| (803215) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by rtype3995 on Wed Jul 1 16:14:52 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by randyo on Wed Jul 1 15:04:32 2009. randyo, I wish that cop could be at least suspended as part of the deal, but nypd is lax when it comes to disciplining their officers.....As for rocking the boat, let me say this : this cop could have cost me days in the street or worse......I did what I had to.....there are a lot of things I've seen cops do and people let them get away with it......I could not let this cop potentially hurt my career or anything else...... |
|
| (Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
| (803216) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by d_mind on Wed Jul 1 16:16:46 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by rtype3995 on Wed Jul 1 16:14:52 2009. Rock the boat and you risk getting wet. |
|
| (803297) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Wed Jul 1 19:02:55 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 10:23:18 2009. While I disagree with him a lot, leave the unemployed part out. What's wrong with being Mr. Mom and raising a kid? This is NYC. My wife earned more and had benefits from the company and I decided to stay freelance so I can take my son to school. A few more years and I will be back in the circuit.He's younger than me but his son is older than mine. You have kids? |
|
| (803361) | |
Re:ef |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 1 20:32:31 2009, in response to RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jun 30 07:32:14 2009. Frivolous lawsuits should not be entertained. Bad railfans make it bad for all of us. |
|
| (803363) | |
Re:ef |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 1 20:39:05 2009, in response to Re:ef, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 1 20:32:31 2009. It's not a frivolous lawsuit.Go live in Iran or North Korea if you like the government running your life. |
|
| (803366) | |
Suing NYPD/NYC for photography arrest |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Jul 1 20:45:44 2009, in response to Re:ef, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 1 20:32:31 2009. Your statements are entirely correct.Your statements are also wholly irrellevant to this post as there are no frivolous lawsuits or bad railfans referred to. |
|
| (803369) | |
Re: Suing NYPD/NYC for photography arrest |
|
|
Posted by Subterranean Railway on Wed Jul 1 20:51:07 2009, in response to Suing NYPD/NYC for photography arrest, posted by R30A on Wed Jul 1 20:45:44 2009. Our Middle-earth troll believes the police are completely infallible. Thus, RType (and all other railfans who've been harassed) must've been doing something wrong. |
|
| (803376) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Subterranean Railway on Wed Jul 1 20:59:35 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by d_mind on Wed Jul 1 00:04:00 2009. The standard D2 series strap is sufficiently comfortable. I've placed gaffer's tape over the Nikon lettering, both for discreetness and to give both sides of the strap a grippy surface.For my D1H, F3, and 400mm (which all arrived sans straps), I use Op/Tech's Pro Straps, which is also a beast of a strap. Never thought of using it as a whip, though. :-) |
|
| (803378) | |
Don't Re:ef |
|
|
Posted by JBar387 on Wed Jul 1 21:00:50 2009, in response to Re:ef, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 1 20:32:31 2009. I'd doubt it is frivolous, Being taken in handcuffs falsely accused of a non-existant law and recive two other charges based on a non-existant law. We are not all bad apples, and I don't think RType3995 deserved the treatment they gave him. |
|
| (803382) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Jul 1 21:04:45 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 18:47:31 2009. I don't disagree that rtype3995 should win the lawsuit and the $, but it's not like Chris is wrong here. It would be taxpayer $ than the cops' salaries [funded by tax dollars] to pay off the lawsuit. |
|
| (803383) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Jul 1 21:05:49 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Jul 1 21:04:45 2009. I mean I should say: I support rtype and hope he wins, but Chris is just making a point. |
|
| (803484) | |
Re: Intensify the lawsuits - end the war against photography |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Wed Jul 1 22:41:36 2009, in response to Re:ef, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 1 20:32:31 2009. These lawsuits should end only when the authorities end their war against photographers. |
|
| (803565) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 1 23:50:24 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Jeff Rosen on Tue Jun 30 18:19:15 2009. Not doing their job..YOU know just like I do they were "ball busting".... |
|
| (803581) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 1 23:58:53 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 13:56:25 2009. Don't you mean "we have to PAY the MTA to USE THEIR PROPERTY"?hELL...We can enter a station...even stand at the turnstyles...[even jump it if you so choose at your own risk]..but to USE its SERVICES,you have to pluck down some chips. |
|
| (803608) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu Jul 2 00:38:13 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 23:57:14 2009. Love that '3RD PERSON' speak. |
|
| (803609) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by d_mind on Thu Jul 2 00:39:40 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Edwards! on Thu Jul 2 00:38:13 2009. I think Brian does that because Brian doesn't like how I call him Brian. |
|
| (803615) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu Jul 2 00:44:04 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:49:40 2009. So what you are saying is that it's OKAY that cops are doing this...we shouldn't do or say anything about it....Hummmm... Glad I don't listen to you...give up a little..THE MAN[like you] will take a lot. You need to think FIRST,Before you post,government tool. |
|
| (803621) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu Jul 2 00:52:05 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:50:39 2009. Nobody can be that dumb.Do you REALLY THINK IT WILL EVER BE OVER? YOU REPUKES WERE THE FOLKS THAT STARTED THIS HOMELAND SECURITY CRAP... Watch how quick you change Your tune as soon as You get tapped on the neck by a blue shirt. |
|
| (803625) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jul 2 00:59:44 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Edwards! on Thu Jul 2 00:52:05 2009. So why are the Dems keeping it up? Eh? |
|
| (803661) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Transit Jeff on Thu Jul 2 04:45:18 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by BMTLines on Tue Jun 30 07:58:26 2009. I agree with you completely. It's really out of hand. I wish RType3995 the very best of luck with the suit.And I also agree with other posters that the police officers should be disciplined for enforcing a law that doesn't exist. I guess they thought they were the judge and jury, as well as the lawmakers in Albany. Law enforcement shouldn't be able to get away with outrageous behavior like this. The United States isn't a police state, yet! |
|
| (803664) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Jul 2 05:31:27 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by CurAke79 on Wed Jul 1 01:23:43 2009. I haven't been hassled in years, only informed that they had to call me in. Back in 2004 a T/O on the Flushing line barked at me and said I couldn't get on his train because I was taking pics. I wasn't planning on boarding anyway, but thought it was funny.your pal, Fred |
|
| (803665) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by JBar387 on Thu Jul 2 05:47:28 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Transit Jeff on Thu Jul 2 04:45:18 2009. Nor should it ever be a police state ever! |
|
| (803671) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jul 2 06:10:34 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Edwards! on Thu Jul 2 00:38:13 2009. Thanks, but that was not the intent. |
|
| (803680) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jul 2 06:17:52 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Transit Jeff on Thu Jul 2 04:45:18 2009. No, not the lawmakers in Albany. This was addressed elsewhere in the thread. |
|
| (803785) | |
Re:ef |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jul 2 12:01:21 2009, in response to Re: Intensify the lawsuits - end the war against photography, posted by BMTLines on Wed Jul 1 22:41:36 2009. He wasn't arrested for photography. And he was released on his own recognizance, plus kept the photos. |
|
| (803813) | |
Re:End the war against photography |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Thu Jul 2 13:15:45 2009, in response to Re:ef, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jul 2 12:01:21 2009. He wasn't arrested for photography.I disagree with you when it comes to this issue. The entire basis for his arrest was the photography. According to the New York Times article he was charged with illegal photography - that was the first thing he was charged with. The cops ordered him to stop taking pictures which is an illegal order that violates the rights granted to him by 21NYCRR1050.9c. Cities and police departments need to be repeatedly sued until they learn to treat people who carry cameras no different than those wearing a necktie. |
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||