| Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN (802645) | |
|
|
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 4 |
||
| (802739) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 12:17:20 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Jun 30 11:25:38 2009. Cops should only enforce those laws that are written and passed by the legislature. They are not legislators and should not be making up their own laws. |
|
| (802741) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:19:26 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Fine, Howard, and Fine on Tue Jun 30 11:30:43 2009. "I think it takes some balls to sue your own employer's police services."Are you implying that the police work for NYCT? Because AFAIK the NYPD does not. They work for the City of New York. |
|
| (802742) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:23:32 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 12:09:41 2009. No it won't. |
|
| (Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
| (802743) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 12:23:38 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 11:15:32 2009. They are the ONLY answer when authorities abuse their power! |
|
| (802747) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:31:12 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 12:17:20 2009. Cops should only enforce those laws that are written and passed by the legislature. They are not legislators and should not be making up their own laws. Well, actually....the text contained in "21 NYCRR Part 1050: Rules Governing the Conduct and Safety of the Public in the Use of the Facilities of New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority" is not written and passed by the legislature. If I understand this process correctly, the New York City Transit Authority has the legal authorization to update these rules as it sees fit. I believe there is an optional or mandatory public comment period. I imagine that the only way to fight NYCTA about a rule already adopted would be to take NYCTA to court. All of this is only my guess based on my limited understanding. If any of this is wrong, I welcome correction. BTW, my understanding is based upon the following, as well as how it is done in other states too. Section 1050.1 Authorization and Purpose. 1. The provisions of sections 1203-a(3) and 1204(5-a) of the Public Authorities Law provide the New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority with the power to make rules governing the conduct and safety of the public in the use and operation of the transit facilities of those authorities. 2. These rules are established by the New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority to promote safety, to facilitate the proper use of the transit facilities of the authorities, to protect those transit facilities and their passengers, and to assure the payment of fares and other lawful charges for the use of their systems. 3. These rules may be amended or added to, from time to time, at the sole discretion of the New York City Transit Authority or Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority in accordance with law. Take Pride,
|
|
| (802748) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Fine, Howard, and Fine on Tue Jun 30 12:32:10 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:19:26 2009. No, not implying that. But the NYPD does provide the policing services for NYCT. You'd think that overall coordination would be good enough that they don't go prowling along stations, busting MTA employees for doing things that aren't illegal.NYPD should know how to apply the real law (not laws they are making up) in train stations. If they are going around making up laws just to arrest MTA employees, there's a serious lack of coordination between the MTA and NYPD. |
|
| (802749) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by d_mind on Tue Jun 30 12:33:21 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Subterranean Railway on Tue Jun 30 09:53:53 2009. What's more shocking is the circumstances surrounding his arrest...if true. |
|
| (802753) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Tue Jun 30 12:38:59 2009, in response to RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jun 30 07:32:14 2009. AMEN!! I hope he wins too!! If taking photos at a public rail/transit platform is illegal, better arrest me and throw me in jail too I guess!! lolBest of luck with that, RTYPE!! Hope it falls in your favor!! |
|
| (802755) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:40:20 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Fine, Howard, and Fine on Tue Jun 30 12:32:10 2009. Ok. But NYPD also provides overall policing services on the streets on NYC, for the people of NYC, and some officers have also been arresting the people of NYC, on the streets of NYC, for taking photos. So I don't see how the subway is any different than the regular streets of the city, in this context.It seems to me that if some officers are willing to enforce non-existent laws, then these officers would be more than willing to arrest NYCT employees. And yes, I agree that all these officers should know exactly what the laws are, particularly in light of the fact that they carry a book which contains them (at least it contains the 1050.X rules). |
|
| (802758) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Charles G on Tue Jun 30 13:06:32 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 11:15:32 2009. Civil suits aren't the answer.Then what is? The attorney came right out in the article and admitted that the $1M figure is for headlines only and implied that he'd accept $31K ($11K for the attorney, $20K for Mr. Taylor). Based on the behavior described by the article and in the original post here, that doesn't seem outrageous. Fairness dictates that we all acknowledge that there may be another side to the story or details that we are unaware of, and that this could impact the size of any settlement. What would your price to be handcuffed, tossed in a holding cell for a few hours and criminally charged for something that wasn't illegal as well as for your time and energy in clearing your name? CG |
|
| (802760) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jun 30 13:34:59 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:19:26 2009. Are you implying that the police work for NYCT? Because AFAIK the NYPD does not. They work for the City of New York.NYCTA employees also work for the City of New York. |
|
| (802761) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by znufrii on Tue Jun 30 13:38:41 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:10:13 2009. Well, that goes without saying, really. |
|
| (802762) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 13:42:53 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jun 30 13:34:59 2009. NYCTA employees also work for the City of New York.No we dont.. We work for a "Divison" of the MTA.... Who is the MTA? Metropolitain Transportation Authority Please correct me if im worng. |
|
| (802763) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Tue Jun 30 13:47:02 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by JBar387 on Tue Jun 30 11:05:45 2009. Since these officers were acting outside the scope of their legitimate authority, what a judge would need to do if and when the verdict comes down against them is to specifically prohibit either the MTA, the NYPD or the City of NY from indemnifying the offending officers and make the officers pay out of their own pockets without any burden on the taxpayers whatsoever. Even if the money is only garnisheed from their paychecks over a period of time, every time the officers see that amount deducted from their paychecks, it will be a constant reminder of their malfeasance! |
|
| (802764) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Tue Jun 30 13:50:32 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Jun 30 11:25:38 2009. See my post. |
|
| (802765) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Tue Jun 30 13:53:27 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 13:42:53 2009. Although, NYCTA employees don't technically work for the City of NY, The NYC Dept of Personnel is still the hiring agency for the NYCTA. |
|
| (802766) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 13:56:25 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 12:12:05 2009. yes they would they would say "now its a liability issue" and point out that it costs the MTA and the City money to fight these cases. That a cheaper and safer route to deter criminals / terrorists would be to outright ban photography. The Subway is State/City Property not public property, you have to pay the MTA to enter its property and thus it belongs to them. I'm not saying I support it, but this is a possible scenario. The NYCLU could fight it but they would lose in the end. |
|
| (802767) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 13:57:23 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by randyo on Tue Jun 30 13:53:27 2009. The NYC Dept of Personnel is still the hiring agency for the NYCTA.Im aware of that randyo my friend but i dont work for them they dont sign my checks. They did process my appication for MTA as well as overseen the test that i took to get hired by the MTA. |
|
| (802768) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Robert King on Tue Jun 30 14:01:40 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 11:15:06 2009. 1940 was the middle of a real war, you idiot!-Robert King |
|
| (802769) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Working Class on Tue Jun 30 14:02:11 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jun 30 13:34:59 2009. NYCT employees are state employees NOT city employees. When Reagan died all state and federal employees got a day off and they tried to not give it to us but they were forced to because we are state employees. |
|
| (802770) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Tue Jun 30 14:02:22 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 13:57:23 2009. NYCTA employees are also members of the NYC Employees' Retirement System. |
|
| (802771) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 14:04:25 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by randyo on Tue Jun 30 14:02:22 2009. Yes im aware of that as well NYCERS's.. |
|
| (802772) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by rtype3995 on Tue Jun 30 14:11:54 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Charles G on Tue Jun 30 13:06:32 2009. Thanks for all the support and kind words.......I'm not looking to get rich off of this ; my lawyer asked me what did I think was fair....I told him a settlement similar to what another person had gotten(he was detained 20 minutes and was forced to delete his pics; he walked out with 31k plus lawyer fees.......that is more than fair....nypd wanted to settle for 7,500!!! I told my lawyer that is unacceptable, and I can wait(usually it takes 3-4 years to have a trial go to civil court) So we'll see what happens now...... |
|
| (802773) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 14:18:03 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Subterranean Railway on Tue Jun 30 11:31:55 2009. And in 2007 virtually ALL PHOTOGRAPHY on the streets of NYC without a permit would have been banned if the proposed MOFTB regulations had passed.In both cases massive public outcry, petitions and threats of lawsuits by the NYCLU saved the day for photographers |
|
| (802774) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by znufrii on Tue Jun 30 14:18:55 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 13:42:53 2009. But, just to explore an aboslutely pointless technicality, isn't the MTA, at least nominally, jointly controlled by both the city and state?I could be wrong. |
|
| (802775) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 14:22:25 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by rtype3995 on Tue Jun 30 14:11:54 2009. Good Luck and stay the coruse. |
|
| (802776) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 14:25:35 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 13:56:25 2009. The reason the MTA dropped the original ban in the 1990's is because the NYCLU threatened to sue. MTA rescinded the ban rather than try to defend it in court.This time the city would not just be facing the NYCLU - as a result of the proposed MOFTB regulations there is now a very well organized coalition of civil rights groups, photographers, artists, freelance journalists and photojournalists that would challenge such a proposal. Legal fees for the MTA would pile into the millions regardless. |
|
| (802777) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 14:26:23 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by znufrii on Tue Jun 30 14:18:55 2009. But, just to explore an aboslutely pointless technicality, isn't the MTA, at least nominally, jointly controlled by both the city and state?Only thing NYC has to do with the MTA with "decisions" is the reps on the MTA board thats it.. Thats all that im aware of. |
|
| (802778) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 14:38:29 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 14:25:35 2009. Then the MTA would simply do the right thing they would keep photography legal but then start to restrict it to where and what type of media you can use...I.E. you can only take photos in the mezzanine of the station not the platform, or you can only use film cameras not digital and filming is not allowed except in the mezzanine and must have prior approval from the MTA. |
|
| (802779) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Tue Jun 30 14:46:14 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 14:38:29 2009. Which would be the same thing as an outright ban. |
|
| (802781) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Tue Jun 30 14:50:15 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 13:56:25 2009. A government agency banning photography would probably be in violation of the First Amendment and grounds for a lawsuit. |
|
| (802788) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 14:59:18 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Jun 30 14:38:29 2009. The permit requirement is what the NYCLU defeated in the 1990's.Besides the MTA isn't even involved in this lawsuit - the offending agency is the NYPD and the issue went way beyond harassment of photographers in the subway. For the last 8 years police officers have been harassing photographers throughout the city - on the streets, in parks, at beaches, etc. |
|
| (802789) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Tue Jun 30 14:59:58 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 10:11:51 2009. The only real way the message will get across is by filing everything possible in the Federal Courts. Making a Federal Case out of it and possibly getting BO's attention might stop police harrassment in other cities. |
|
| (802790) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Tue Jun 30 15:00:21 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:50:39 2009. Go live in Iran then. |
|
| (802792) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Tue Jun 30 15:05:07 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:12:15 2009. Especially if you put the words "P.B." into the complaint and lawsuit.Although it seems like that only on "Law & Order" do cops that behave in that manner get convicted. |
|
| (802793) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Tue Jun 30 15:05:39 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Jun 30 11:23:44 2009. You're in the wrong country then. Go live in Iran. |
|
| (802798) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by znufrii on Tue Jun 30 15:29:14 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 14:26:23 2009. Thanks for the clarification. |
|
| (802808) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by HarryP on Tue Jun 30 15:53:46 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 12:17:20 2009. Some comments:Glad to see someone else has the balls to take on the NYPD, as they have been acting in a unprofessional manner in recent years. I just got a phone call from a fellow railfan in NYC, who told me that the lawsuit was in the NY Daily News. I have not yet seen it. That is the best way to go, as government agencies can't stand bad press. About public property: The MTA is a tax-funded state agency, and its facilities are in the public domain. They do have the right to make their own rules/laws, but cannot enact any statutes that would be in violation of the U.S. constitution. As far as the lawsuit by RType3995 is concerned, it's more than just a case of harassment. This is a serious violation of one's civil rights! After being handcuffed, placed in a holding cell, and denied the use of toilet facilities, on trumped-up charges that were subsequently dismissed, he deserves to be compensated for this humiliation, which I'm sure he will be. This will send a strong message to other government agencies. We should all be thankful that we live in the United States of America, as this is probably the only country where one can actually stand up and address their grievances without fear of retaliation and/or punishment. In the U.K., photographers' rights have just about been eliminated by government decrees. |
|
| (802814) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Tue Jun 30 16:13:55 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jun 30 12:31:12 2009. It's a bit more complicated and it does require review/approval from the executive branch and the public comment period is mandatory:Click here for the process |
|
| (802849) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Tue Jun 30 17:49:48 2009, in response to RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Jun 30 07:32:14 2009. Whether RType wins or loses I hope he likes being a Conductor for the next 24 years because it's things like this (being known as a troublemaker) that winds up holding back others for promotions. |
|
| (802858) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Tue Jun 30 18:19:15 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by arnine on Tue Jun 30 07:37:08 2009. Disciplined heavily? For what, doing their job? |
|
| (802864) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 18:45:39 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:37:47 2009. You're a tool. |
|
| (802865) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 18:46:31 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:36:34 2009. So he should not file a suit, do nothing and just forget it happened? |
|
| (802867) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 18:47:08 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:38:14 2009. You're a tool. |
|
| (802868) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 18:47:31 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:37:24 2009. You're a tool. |
|
| (802869) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 18:49:27 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jun 30 09:50:39 2009. It never fades as long as you have people who run for office and use "9/11 safety?" as their sole campaign point (Rudy Giuliani anyone). |
|
| (802873) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 18:57:04 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 18:49:27 2009. Hey MJF why would anybody care what an unemployed person thinks?BTW how do you like mr "S" during the daytimes over at 71st? Be sure to give him a wide birth that B/O is kickin... He wont be missed at Parsons... |
|
| (802876) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 19:05:12 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 18:57:04 2009. I've known "S" since 1993 back at Main Street. He's a "special" individual but I've dealt with worse (we have a midnight M/M on the R who stinks in the wintertime).His first couple of days here have been uneventful. |
|
| (802880) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jun 30 19:07:35 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by MJF on Tue Jun 30 19:05:12 2009. I remember him from the 7 Line in my A Div days as well..To say i was "surprised" to see him on the J line when i picked over there... Just make sure you dont shake his hands.. |
|
| (802882) | |
Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Tue Jun 30 19:10:16 2009, in response to Re: RType3995 Suing NYPD, NYC for $1M in Photography Arrest: NYDN, posted by BMTLines on Tue Jun 30 08:18:31 2009. I read the NY Daily News article and accompying discussion. There still are those who think that terrorists actually do take pictures of potential attack sites, and it seems some simply kowtow to those who are paranoid about it.Like I said previously, I suspect we will see an episode of "Law & Order" (or one of the spinoffs) based on this. |
|
|
Page 2 of 4 |
||