|
|
| Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! (728746) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (728746) | |
Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009 My good friend Terrence Goode, who had a minor role in the upcoming remake of "The Taking Of Pelham One Two Three" sent me a couple of post-production pics from the movie. John Travolta is Mr. Green, the leader of the hijackers, reprising Robert Shaw's role in the original: Playing opposite Travolta is Denzel Washington, who reprises Walter Matthau as Zachary Garber:  Now, in the remake, Washigton suggested a rewrite, making Garber a TA dispatcher. Washigton admits not having seen the original (or having read the John Godey novel), but he wanted to give the Garber character "a greater challenge", so he asked the studio to portray Garber as a cop who was demoted to train dispatcher. Ludicrous, and seriously stretching the bounds of artistic license! As the author of several novels, I can say with some authority that "suspension of disbelief" has definite limits, and I told Terry that I strongly took issue with this apparent gross departure from both the novel and the 1974 film. I visited him during production, and I said--then--that messing with the storyline by introducing a backstory that does not appear in the original work is just asking for trouble. As for the Travolta pic, he is aboard what appears to be an NTT, in daylight, but the annunciator behind and above him reads, "42 Street"! Come ON now! I'll have to look into THAT when I get some advance footage (Terry knows I'm a railfan and as a Christmas gift, is slipping me some P123 goodies--I'll post 'em as they come along--lol!)...and see the photography sequences and whether the proofs are the same... Geez, I hope they don't butcher this remake like some other horrors Hollywood has attempted...thoughts? |
|
|
| (728754) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 16:07:01 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. cool, thanks |
|
|
| (728762) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Jan 2 16:12:30 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. The "Pelham" remake is directed by Tony Scott, best know for his action movies with dark scenes, like "Top Gun", "Days of Thunder", "Enemy of The State". Scott paired with Denzel in "Crimson Tide", with Gene Hackman, and is also director of the "Warriors" remake.Scott has some hits, other misses. However, from the pics you showed me, I smell this movie is more like the fake Canadian TV remake than the brillant 1974 movie. Another note I keep forgetting to post. . .the subway entrance and outdoor parking lot at SW corner of 28th Street and Park Ave South are both gone, a new hi rise building is going up now. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (728767) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jan 2 16:20:46 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. As much as I love Denzel's work, allowing him rewrites tells me that as usual, Travolta was out of control and this film will be compared to Edward Olmos rather than Walter Matthau. Obviously a "pre-clear." :( |
|
|
| (728768) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Fri Jan 2 16:21:40 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. Thanks for the info, however my review of the movie is:WORST MOVIE EVER! 
|
|
|
| (728769) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:22:23 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Jan 2 16:12:30 2009. Well, Scott had his way in the end. Washingtom will be Lt. Garber in the film. Last May, they were filming all around and in the outside tracks at Hoyt-Schermerhorn and in the NYTM tunnels between there and the Museum. We'll see how it all turns out... |
|
|
| (728770) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Fri Jan 2 16:22:42 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. Thanks for the info & the photos. |
|
|
| (728772) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Jan 2 16:26:36 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:22:23 2009. As well as the Manhattan Bridge and the 1st Avenue tunnel under the United Nations area. |
|
|
| (728773) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:28:43 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jan 2 16:20:46 2009. He very nearly DID get his rewrite...the compromise has Washington playing a fallen-from-grace Lt. Garber: Notice the NYCT jacket, NOT NYPD...I mean, what's up with that? |
|
|
| (728776) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jan 2 16:34:08 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:28:43 2009. Well ... once upon a time, transit cops laugher at the blue suits upstairs because they didn't know what a long-short-long-short was. Now they is one. But they wasn't once. I'll guess Denzel is wearing that vest so he can has his pixure taken in a cab. Bad news is that it'll be the cab behind him. :) |
|
|
| (728780) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Fri Jan 2 16:45:17 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Jan 2 16:26:36 2009. What the hell. We should just go see it and enjoy it for what it is. |
|
|
| (728809) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by RAILFAN_7_40ST on Fri Jan 2 18:09:38 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. cool..thanksyeah this is a nonsense "in daylight, the annunciator behind and above him reads, 42 Street" |
|
|
| (728826) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Fri Jan 2 19:22:53 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by RAILFAN_7_40ST on Fri Jan 2 18:09:38 2009. We will just pick this thing to death...... |
|
|
| (728829) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Fri Jan 2 19:27:21 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Jan 2 16:12:30 2009. Denzel has only been in just a few bad movies in his entire career. I would bet that this movie with a great cast, big budget, and great director will turn out pretty well. I'll definitely go see it. |
|
|
| (728836) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Jan 2 19:54:01 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. It hasn't been released yet and it already stinks. The current Hollywood MO is to resurrect a classic film or TV program from the past thirty years or so, use today's current crop of actors and maybe even tweak the storyline a bit.The result is a remake that really sucks. None that I can recount that won any Academy Awards or even worthy of. Yes, the rail fans here will get cheap thrills ogling at an R-62A dressed up as an R-142, but that's where it ends. The original Pelham 1-2-3 had something for everybody. Yes, the rail fans got their jollies see an R-22 being hijacked. But also the the non rail fans were treated to an action packed well written and fast paced movie. It boggles my mind as to why Hollywood must remake classic films only to insult them with inferior re-do's. Here is my last two words on current remakes. THEY SUCK ! Bill "Newkirk" Lights, camera, zzzzzzzzz! |
|
|
| (728837) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Fri Jan 2 19:55:36 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Jan 2 19:54:01 2009. At least they're filming it in NY. It could have easily been done in LA to save money and then call it NY for the film. |
|
|
| (728855) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Fri Jan 2 20:32:51 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. In the novel, Garber was the Operations Lieutenant. About the only thing he ever says is, "I want every ass in this place moving." |
|
|
| (728856) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Jan 2 20:33:19 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Easy on Fri Jan 2 19:55:36 2009. At least they're filming it in NY. It could have easily been done in LA to save money and then call it NY for the film.Could have been worse, they could have filmed it in Toronto and make it look like NYC like the movie "Big Girls Don't Cry" starring Rikki Lake. Bill "Newkirk" |
|
|
| (728858) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Fri Jan 2 20:41:02 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Jan 2 20:33:19 2009. Never heard of that one. |
|
|
| (728863) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Lord Vader on Fri Jan 2 20:54:13 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. Shouldn't Travolta be "Mr Blue" who was Shaw's character? Either way, despite inacuracies, I will go see this movie.Vader |
|
|
| (728865) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Fri Jan 2 20:59:08 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Lord Vader on Fri Jan 2 20:54:13 2009. Or, if they choose to stick to the novel, Ryder. |
|
|
| (728875) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Jan 2 21:16:36 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Easy on Fri Jan 2 20:41:02 2009. Never heard of that one.I stand corrected on the title which really is "Baby Cakes" released in February 1989. The Four Seasons song was featured in the opening credits, that's where I goofed. Notice the TTC subway masquerading as the #1 train. IMDB |
|
|
| (728885) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by straphanger9 on Fri Jan 2 21:36:50 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Lord Vader on Fri Jan 2 20:54:13 2009. so who gets to be Mr. B-b-b-b-rown? :D |
|
|
| (728888) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Marc A. Rivlin on Fri Jan 2 21:40:03 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jan 2 16:34:08 2009. Any chance he's wearing TA garb so that, if he is seen by the hijackers, they would think he's a transit worker rather than a cop? (I was going to say "he's impersonating a TA employee," but no good Could come of that in this forum.) |
|
|
| (728889) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Fri Jan 2 21:42:01 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Marc A. Rivlin on Fri Jan 2 21:40:03 2009. I was going to say "he's impersonating a TA employee," but no good Could come of that in this forumlmao! |
|
|
| (728904) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 22:22:23 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Fri Jan 2 20:59:08 2009. Travolta IS Ryder. I got the colors mixed up. Sorry. Mr. Green in the 1974 film was the motorman, played by Martin Balsam. IIRC, there are several scenes in which Balsam is shown operating R-22 7439. Was he actually operating, or was the train being pushed when those cab shots were done? |
|
|
| (728912) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jan 2 23:11:39 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Marc A. Rivlin on Fri Jan 2 21:40:03 2009. Heh. Our reef is much fuller than the Hatlantic Oshun. :) |
|
|
| (728925) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by jabrams on Sat Jan 3 00:01:22 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:28:43 2009. Notice that the taxi medallion # doesn't match the license plate! |
|
|
| (728926) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by jabrams on Sat Jan 3 00:07:43 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. In the original, the #6 local looped around South Ferry. when was the #6 shortened to Bklyn Bridge, or how did the train get from the local to the express track? (the removed connection prior to Fulton Street?). |
|
|
| (728930) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by mike cruz on Sat Jan 3 00:28:13 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. he looks like hes running in front of a green screen with a video of cabs on it. |
|
|
| (728938) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by R32 - Sea Beach Express on Sat Jan 3 01:01:31 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 22:22:23 2009. Train was being operated from the second car.... |
|
|
| (728942) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by mr_brian on Sat Jan 3 02:00:15 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by TransitChuckG on Fri Jan 2 19:22:53 2009. I guess I'm going to be the only one who will give this movie a chance? |
|
|
| (728943) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by straphanger9 on Sat Jan 3 02:03:37 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by mr_brian on Sat Jan 3 02:00:15 2009. I will be giving it a chance, but the performances, believability, and the telling of the story will mean more IMO if it's a good movie than the technical accuracy of all the "rail fan-y" details...it'd be nice to get both, but whether this movie measures up or even comes close I think will have more to do with the first one. |
|
|
| (728955) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 3 05:04:26 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. Meh...remakes....Still I'll leave the book open until after I've seen it. Maybe we should all go together and give it the Rocky Horror Picture Show treatment. Nah...bad idear. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (728956) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jan 3 05:21:37 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 3 05:04:26 2009. Foaming rice ... that'd be worth the price of cleanup right there! :) |
|
|
| (728958) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sat Jan 3 05:48:54 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. Looks like the first shot is outside the Church Avenue portal on the Culver Line.Also look for an R-142A (Q) train in the movie, and Church Avenue IND dressed up like 51 Street on the Lex. |
|
|
| (729001) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Jan 3 08:52:00 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by straphanger9 on Fri Jan 2 21:36:50 2009. We shall see. Hard to believe that Earl Hindman aka Wilson Wilson played that role in the original. |
|
|
| (729163) | |
THE DASTARDLY R142 IMPOSTER(WAS: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics....) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 3 16:53:34 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. MY 41 or 2 pics of the dastardly imposter.Taken by me about 6 months agoIN CCYD |
|
|
| (729207) | |
Re: THE DASTARDLY R142 IMPOSTER(WAS: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics....) |
|
|
Posted by Railfan_7_40st on Sat Jan 3 18:20:03 2009, in response to THE DASTARDLY R142 IMPOSTER(WAS: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics....), posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 3 16:53:34 2009. old post.. |
|
|
| (729210) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Jan 3 18:23:21 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 3 05:04:26 2009. i think we should |
|
|
| (729211) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Jan 3 18:24:25 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by mr_brian on Sat Jan 3 02:00:15 2009. no |
|
|
| (729270) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Danny at 103rd street on Sat Jan 3 20:13:13 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. LOL, wow Never thought to see a celebrity use a MTA Vest. That 42 Street Sign looks to big that it looks like the whole 42ND sign cant fit |
|
|
| (729306) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Jan 3 21:27:12 2009, in response to Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Jan 2 16:00:10 2009. Unfortunately, 99 44/100 of the Subchat posters have seen the original, so this remake won't even get by a red signal without tripping.There seems to be a hard fast rule that no remake of Pelham 1-2-3 can be any good. #1 stank, so #2 can't get out of its own way. |
|
|
| (729320) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Jan 3 22:09:31 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Jan 3 18:23:21 2009. yeah, why not. I'd be up for it.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (729345) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Jan 3 22:42:31 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Jan 3 21:27:12 2009. nope |
|
|
| (729393) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Sun Jan 4 02:04:00 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Newkirk Images on Fri Jan 2 19:54:01 2009. The original Pelham 1-2-3 (although it too has been picked for inaccuracies) included bits of information about the how the TA operated. I found those points interesting, considering I didn't know that much when I first saw it, but I'm sure lots of regular (non-fan) riders would also.A few examples: The beginning with the new C/R: "Front and back. Shuttin' the doors. Rear section first and the first section. And the doors are closed. Now I'm checking my indicator lights to make sure all the doors are locked. I remove my switch key and back out the window for a distance of three car lengths to make sure no one's being dragged. 51st Street next stop; next stop, 51st Street. How'd I do? " "Each car in the IRT is 50 ft long." (not sure if that quote is exact) "Little gizmo known as a dead man's feature" "These are the assignment desks, one for each of the lines. This is the BMT, the IRT." I wonder if the upcoming remake will include similar info in the dialogue. |
|
|
| (729411) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Jan 4 05:52:05 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Broadway Buffer on Sun Jan 4 02:04:00 2009. Heh. As someone who was WORKING there at the time, it doesn't explain "technical squat" either as far as how the TA operated. Neither the so-called "schoolcar" for the n00b conductor, nor pretty much anything as to accurately displaying any aspect of how the TA operated at that time. I won't even bother with the details of the alleged "rigging" would not have moved the train, at least the reverser key actually doing something was accurate, but not on that particular car class without DUMPING it. :)That all said, it was a GREAT movie! However as far as "learning anything" from watching ANY of it, I still cannot to this day even IMAGINE how the MTA coulda gotten their panties in a knot over it. The "information" presented was not only useless, but would get you spotted in a SECOND as "not one of US." But STILL, a *great* flick ... but those of us who served at the time *earned* our belly laughs over the minutae. :) |
|
|
| (729413) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sun Jan 4 05:54:15 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Broadway Buffer on Sun Jan 4 02:04:00 2009. LOL It'd be hilarious if they said "A Division" or "B Division" in the remake.At least in the original, regular people back then still knew what the IRT, BMT, and IND was. |
|
|
| (729456) | |
Re: THE DASTARDLY R142 IMPOSTER(WAS: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics....) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sun Jan 4 09:07:17 2009, in response to THE DASTARDLY R142 IMPOSTER(WAS: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics....), posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Jan 3 16:53:34 2009. No shit, Sherlock. I made that abundantly clear, I took and own the pictures AND made the original post. Can you read? |
|
|
| (729463) | |
Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary! |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sun Jan 4 09:24:48 2009, in response to Re: Pelham 1-2-3 Remake Pics & Commentary!, posted by Broadway Buffer on Sun Jan 4 02:04:00 2009. Bud Carmody, the conductor in the original, actually claimed that "every car on the IRT is 72 feet long, cost $150,000, weighs 75,000 pounds." |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
