|
|
| Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder (698990) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 6 |
||
|
| (699290) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 23:52:17 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Oct 28 23:49:16 2008. I'm ok with it. It doesn't at all affect what I'm saying and what you are denying, because you are so stupid. |
|
|
| (699291) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Oct 28 23:53:00 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 23:46:43 2008. Hiding behind someone else now? |
|
|
| (699292) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 28 23:53:40 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Tue Oct 28 20:28:04 2008. 'The MTA doesn't make condoms and yet here you are?'THEY DON"T??????????????????? damn, WHAT have I been using all these years???????? |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (699293) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Oct 28 23:54:16 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 23:47:34 2008. The only stupid I'm doing is arging with you. |
|
|
| (699294) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 28 23:55:09 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 28 23:53:40 2008. Big Bug boots? :) |
|
|
| (699295) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Oct 28 23:56:31 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 23:48:51 2008. YAWN! |
|
|
| (699296) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Oct 28 23:58:04 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 23:51:54 2008. If you're not repeating yourself, you're reposting yourself. :-) |
|
|
| (699300) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Wed Oct 29 00:07:54 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Oct 28 23:52:16 2008. No, but follow the logic. |
|
|
| (699301) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 00:10:50 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by J trainloco on Wed Oct 29 00:07:54 2008. R68 cars are not beinng retired so they are not getting reefed. |
|
|
| (699303) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Wed Oct 29 00:15:43 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 00:10:50 2008. But an R68 or younger car may contain another copy of the sensor system installed on the erroneously reefed car. This is a train of thought separate from that expressed in the original posting.Please tell me you're at least starting to follow this subthread, right? I mean nobody can be this stupid, how do you get outside in the morning without getting oatmeal in the VCR? |
|
|
| (699306) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Oct 29 00:20:50 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by WillD on Wed Oct 29 00:15:43 2008. CCRs should be able to withstand an oatmeal attack. Should be standard equipment... :0) |
|
|
| (699307) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 00:25:14 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by WillD on Wed Oct 29 00:15:43 2008. R68 or younger cars may contain copies of the sensor system.But how many of thm have been reefed in the past month or so? VCR? These days it's the DVD players most people have. In a pinch the tray you put the DVD in makes a good cup holder. |
|
|
| (699308) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Wed Oct 29 00:27:53 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 00:25:14 2008. R68 or younger cars may contain copies of the sensor system.But how many of thm have been reefed in the past month or so? None, and no one suggested that the reefed car is an R68. The poster was suggesting that in addition to the car currently in the Atlantic, there may be an R68 with the equipment on board. |
|
|
| (699309) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Oct 29 00:32:08 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by RonInBayside on Wed Oct 29 00:20:50 2008. VCR...my bad |
|
|
| (699311) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 00:57:07 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by J trainloco on Wed Oct 29 00:27:53 2008. This thread started with the news that a subway car recently reefed had a phototype hidden on it.Unless a R68 has also been reefed, it has nothing to do with this thrade. |
|
|
| (699312) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by BLE-NIMX on Wed Oct 29 01:01:11 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Tue Oct 28 23:17:56 2008. I thought he likes backsides |
|
|
| (699350) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 29 02:47:33 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 20:59:15 2008. LOL It's true.I LOL'd. |
|
|
| (699354) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by R 36 ML 9542 on Wed Oct 29 03:25:01 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Oct 28 20:56:32 2008. Now how are they going to get that car out of the water? |
|
|
| (699355) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Wed Oct 29 03:42:13 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 00:57:07 2008. Unless a R68 has also been reefed, it has nothing to do with this thrade.If someone speculates that the same system may have been fitted to an R68 which is currently in service then it has everything to do with this subthread. That's exactly what happened and exactly what has taken you a few dozen postings to get through your head. |
|
|
| (699356) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Wed Oct 29 03:43:02 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by R 36 ML 9542 on Wed Oct 29 03:25:01 2008. Weeks dropped it down there, Weeks can pick it back up off the seafloor, for a price. |
|
|
| (699357) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 29 03:49:54 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 00:57:07 2008. Unless a R68 has also been reefed, it has nothing to do with this thrade.Ugh, no. This all started because YOU SAID: If the subway car in question was reefed, I doubt if it was a R68. |
|
|
| (699364) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 29 04:27:45 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by WillD on Wed Oct 29 03:42:13 2008. They shoulda done it to an R142 ... the radiation alone from the source in the box would keep the black box from doing its proper thing. Sure hope it's a LEAD car. :) |
|
|
| (699366) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Wed Oct 29 05:23:54 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 23:33:04 2008. You are not very smart. You most likely have a very low IQ. You most likely do not poses much common sense.Feeding your superiority complex? You are a POS. |
|
|
| (699367) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 29 05:26:23 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by MJF on Wed Oct 29 05:23:54 2008. It's not his fault. Jerry Lewis Telethon didn't do so well this year, and his meds have worn off. :) |
|
|
| (699368) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Wed Oct 29 05:38:49 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 29 05:26:23 2008. Twerps positive contribution to this board is now limited to some photos. Otherwise, he seems to be here to go after his 2 or 3 favorite punching bags.Pathetic. |
|
|
| (699370) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 29 05:45:41 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by MJF on Wed Oct 29 05:38:49 2008. Well ... even the photos aren't much joy. I mean how many 3/4 shots of the same old trains can anybody stand? And even his "passenger shots" show a complete lack of "emotional connection" as were seen in so many old vintage "car shots of the RIDERS", many in black and white, years ago?OK, lots of "photofoamers" here, so won't mess with a cult ... but if only the boy knew what the word "mensch" meant, maybe it'd be better. But he'd prefer to play "high poobah" than get down with the rest of us. Now WATCH me get BACK on his shitlist again. Heh. :) |
|
|
| (699371) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 05:58:52 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by BLE-NIMX on Wed Oct 29 01:01:11 2008. Especially if someone falls on him. Heh! |
|
|
| (699373) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 06:08:56 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by R 36 ML 9542 on Wed Oct 29 03:25:01 2008. If they want it back that much,they'll find a way. |
|
|
| (699375) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 06:13:12 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 29 03:49:54 2008. This all started because ROCKPARKMAN said the phototype was hadden on a reefed subway car.I just doubted it was a R68. There is no reason to reef them. They're not retired. |
|
|
| (699378) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 06:19:53 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 29 05:26:23 2008. Truly not his fault.That's what happens when someone grows up. They're no longer "cute". |
|
|
| (699379) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Oct 29 06:20:21 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by MJF on Wed Oct 29 05:23:54 2008. More of a PIA/ |
|
|
| (699383) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 06:36:24 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 29 03:49:54 2008. lol, he still hasn't gotten it! |
|
|
| (699388) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 06:44:03 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 29 02:47:33 2008. Thank you G1. |
|
|
| (699389) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 06:45:59 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by MJF on Wed Oct 29 05:23:54 2008. Glad to have pissed you off! Don't die of a heart attack! |
|
|
| (699405) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by metropod on Wed Oct 29 07:35:52 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 28 23:33:53 2008. no, they've only reefed equpimnet in a poor state. and angian, your ego is going to make you get into a big argument with me bacuase you don't like it when someone's oppion is diffrent than yours. |
|
|
| (699407) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 07:39:50 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by metropod on Wed Oct 29 07:35:52 2008. Nope, as I wrote, you are wrong. They have reefed many "good" trains. |
|
|
| (699411) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by metropod on Wed Oct 29 07:49:25 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 07:39:50 2008. No |
|
|
| (699412) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 07:50:33 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by metropod on Wed Oct 29 07:49:25 2008. Yes, they have reefed some good trains. |
|
|
| (699416) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by metropod on Wed Oct 29 08:05:24 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 07:50:33 2008. this is my imppreson of you: no your wrong. |
|
|
| (699423) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 08:22:32 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by metropod on Wed Oct 29 08:05:24 2008. this is my impression of you: i wurkd in teh museem so i no everyting |
|
|
| (699429) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Wed Oct 29 09:31:09 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by R 36 ML 9542 on Wed Oct 29 03:25:01 2008. Send divers down. Attach hooks to strong points on car body. Lift.Probably repeat, moving unwanted cars out of the way before they find the one that they need. If they want a kinder, gentler, more even lift, they can attach lift bags around the perimeter of the car, to help. |
|
|
| (699431) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Wed Oct 29 09:32:48 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Tue Oct 28 20:59:52 2008. It’s unfortunate that the rest of him didn’t follow suit! |
|
|
| (699433) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 09:33:31 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by JohnL on Wed Oct 29 09:31:09 2008. hence up to $16 million, right? |
|
|
| (699437) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Wed Oct 29 09:36:24 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 29 05:45:41 2008. Sometime Brian will learn a little patience. Maybe.Though I do agree with him that Russell could use some reading comprehension skills. It’s just the way that Brian sympathetically points out the problem. But it was good for some entertainment on a boring Wednesday morning! |
|
|
| (699440) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 09:37:50 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by JohnL on Wed Oct 29 09:36:24 2008. Patience? Please humor me by explaining in full detail what you are talking about. Go on. |
|
|
| (699441) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 09:38:53 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by JohnL on Wed Oct 29 09:36:24 2008. Also, I find it disgusting that you choose to fraternize with such scum of the board. Second post today where you've done it. |
|
|
| (699454) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Oct 29 09:52:50 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by BLE-NIMX on Wed Oct 29 01:01:11 2008. 
|
|
|
| (699457) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Oct 29 09:54:38 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 09:38:53 2008. So you're fighting with John now, too, eh? |
|
|
| (699464) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Oct 29 10:02:56 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by RonInBayside on Wed Oct 29 09:54:38 2008. Only a matter of time before he alienates everyone. But, you know that already. |
|
|
| (699476) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by metropod on Wed Oct 29 11:04:39 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Oct 29 08:22:32 2008. well, atlest you got one thing right :) |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 6 |
||
