|
|
| SAS update (645035) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
| (645039) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Sun Jul 6 10:22:23 2008, in response to SAS update, posted by mtl on Sun Jul 6 10:07:04 2008. |
|
|
| (645083) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Jul 6 12:15:16 2008, in response to SAS update, posted by mtl on Sun Jul 6 10:07:04 2008. Careful who you mention that to. MTA might seriously considering that. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (645094) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jul 6 13:00:00 2008, in response to SAS update, posted by mtl on Sun Jul 6 10:07:04 2008. This has been posted before, but it's significant news, so well worth discussing. Don't worry about reposting.Construction costs are skyrocketing and the citizens want the subway built within the budget available (otherwise there's no subway at all). The three-track 72nd St design is nice to have but by no means mandatory for the most important SAS service patterns. A few of the obsessive types here might bellyache about it, but most people don't care. They care that the train line gets built, and reducing the size of the station will save a huge amount of money.. |
|
|
| (645103) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 13:28:17 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jul 6 13:00:00 2008. Well said. |
|
|
| (645105) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Jul 6 13:44:08 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 13:28:17 2008. Now we wait for it to be well done. |
|
|
| (645106) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Sun Jul 6 13:53:10 2008, in response to SAS update, posted by mtl on Sun Jul 6 10:07:04 2008. "a single track shuttle from 63rd/Lex to 96th"That's Phase I. |
|
|
| (645150) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 17:04:21 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 13:28:17 2008. No it wasn't. |
|
|
| (645151) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jul 6 17:06:15 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 13:28:17 2008. FALSE |
|
|
| (645273) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 23:05:34 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jul 6 17:06:15 2008. BS |
|
|
| (645275) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by R160 8818 on Sun Jul 6 23:10:04 2008, in response to SAS update, posted by mtl on Sun Jul 6 10:07:04 2008. YOU'RE LATE. |
|
|
| (645280) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 23:16:44 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 23:05:34 2008. Nope. He's right. We've told you this many, many times. But you refuse to listen. Your loss. |
|
|
| (645283) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 23:18:36 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 23:16:44 2008. Nope |
|
|
| (645285) | |
Re: SAS update |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 23:19:26 2008, in response to Re: SAS update, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jul 6 23:18:36 2008. We've told you this many, many times. But you refuse to listen. Your loss. |
|
|
