|
|
| Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 (644521) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (645206) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:19:33 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 20:17:17 2008. Can you read? I asked him to explain. He has refused. As such, he leaves me no choice but to stick to my original post. If you want to explain, go right ahead. |
|
|
| (645207) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 20:22:25 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:19:33 2008. This is the statement that you describe as nonsensical, no?I'm amazed that people stay on the el platforms to watch. Seems to be a good view and you only miss the ground show. Sharp pictures. What's nonsensical about it? |
|
|
| (645209) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:28:36 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 20:22:25 2008. No, just the last statement. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (645214) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 20:41:36 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:28:36 2008. "Sharp pictures."What is nonsensical about that statement? |
|
|
| (645216) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:56:16 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 20:41:36 2008. Read the subthread in order. It is explained. |
|
|
| (645235) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:29:08 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:56:16 2008. It is explained.Not at all. Hence, my question. |
|
|
| (645237) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 21:30:36 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:29:08 2008. Yes it is. Unlike the Chicago guy, I thoroughly explained my reasoning. |
|
|
| (645240) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:40:02 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 21:30:36 2008. Unlike the Chicago guy, I thoroughly explained my reasoning.Considering that you're the one who boldly asserted that he made a "nonsensical" statement, where is this alleged justification for your charge that David Harrison's remark, "[s]harp pictures" was nonsensical? 'Sharp' has a proper sense. And unless you're clueless, 'pictures' has a clear reference. So how exactly was his statement "nonsensical"? |
|
|
| (645242) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 21:41:44 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:40:02 2008. I explained that! Read the subthread! There was a whole discussion about this! |
|
|
| (645243) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:47:13 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 21:41:44 2008. 'Sharp' has several senses, at least of two of which would have been proper for Mr. Harrison to use. (Indeed, our resident CTA-area-phile explicitly said as much by actually providing you with the relevant excerpt from a dictionary). 'Pictures' is a clear reference to the pictures taken by Mr. Monorail. So how could Mr. Harrison's statement, "Sharp pictures", possibly be "nonsensical", as you have asserted? |
|
|
| (645244) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 21:48:19 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:47:13 2008. The issue is obviously how he used the word sharp. I can't beleive you couldn't pick that up. |
|
|
| (645246) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:51:33 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 21:48:19 2008. The issue is obviously how he used the word sharp.How exactly does his use of the term 'sharp' make his statement "nonsensical"? |
|
|
| (645249) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:07:43 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:51:33 2008. That was explained quite clearly. |
|
|
| (645251) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:08:51 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 21:51:33 2008. Listen, you're obviously wasting my time. If the Chicago guy doesn't want to say, then he doesn't want to say. As such, I'll just stick with my original statement in reply to him. No need for you to get bothered. |
|
|
| (645254) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 22:19:56 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:08:51 2008. I'm wondering why a statement that has proper sense and reference is called "nonsensical" by you. So far, you have completely failed to back up your accusation that David Harrison wrote nonsense. In fact, the only nonsense that I see is the lack of a clear reply on your behalf to point how exactly the allegedly nonsensical statement is, if it is in fact, nonsensical other than your multiple evasions on this count.You confuse your own low opinion of monorail's pictures with whether or not the statement in question has a proper sense. Just because you hold an opinion on a matter doesn't mean that language itself must conform solely to your preference. You are mistaken to think that the statement you have complained so much about was "nonsensical". |
|
|
| (645256) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:25:24 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 22:19:56 2008. Nope, I did not confuse that. You misread the subthread. I'm sorry it wasn't written more clearly for you. |
|
|
| (645257) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:30:31 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:09:52 2008. No, I didn't read that. It is not about the topic of discussion.How could you have not read the story. It was only four lines long...it was doublespaced for clarity...and it was at the top of the post. You mean you only responded to the bottom half of the post. Then how could you know WHEN the story ended so that you would know what to partially respond to. That is...."How would you know" without reading the top half. So "not reading" is not plausible. Despite what you believe, the story DOES have an impact on the question at hand. The other part of the question you have agreed... that I am not to be bound by your definitions of amazed. Thank you suh!! As for the word "sharp" and usage of the same. I've offered a set of definitions for you to choose from. You chose....you were WRONG...I informed you of that. You can supply your own set of definitions and usages if you desire. I'll tell you if your are right or wrong. Or maybe another way.... sharp clothes sharp car sharp song sharp design sharp idea sharp pencil sharp cheese sharp note sharp look sharp scheme sharp wrap sharp iPod wrap (journal SQ would like that one)(Where is he, by the way?} sharp location sharp concept (list continues on and on and on) David Harrison |
|
|
| (645259) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:42:14 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:30:31 2008. ???How about you just tell me your definition of sharp? I guessed and guessed wrong. Now you tell me the correct answer. |
|
|
| (645260) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:44:57 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:42:14 2008. It's my game...my rules. I'm not gonna take the nets down and take the basketball home.David Harrison |
|
|
| (645262) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:49:07 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:44:57 2008. It's not a game. You don't seem to be able to be mature about this. I have no choice but to repeat my original statement, that most of his photos were not sharp. |
|
|
| (645263) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:54:06 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:49:07 2008. "It's not a game"??? It must be to you. Look at all these responses. Someone comes here and they'll wonder...what does all this have to do with subways, LOL. I've got some movies to get ready for posting. Have a good day.David Harrison |
|
|
| (645264) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 22:54:17 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 18:27:21 2008. 'You would need to make very good use of the manual controls of a camera to get properly exposed shots there.'if that's what you want, then go ahead... Oh and by the way, let's see and critique your shots of the fireworks.... |
|
|
| (645265) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 22:54:53 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 18:27:21 2008. 'I disagree. 'it wouldn't be you, unless you did!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| (645268) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 23:00:30 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 22:25:24 2008. like i said previously, he needs to disagree in order to have a conversation with someone.Without someone here to discuss things with, he'll be left to talk to his wife.... But he's practically always here..... |
|
|
| (645274) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 23:09:16 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:54:06 2008. He's just trying to 'play' you, get you agitatedit's a game to him, he makes the rules as he goes along |
|
|
| (645279) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 23:14:47 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:54:06 2008. Correct, it's not a game. You're the only one making it so. The responses have everything to do with subways. It's a shame you're not mature enough to have an adult conversation. Like I said, most of his photos were not sharp. And that's the truth. |
|
|
| (645292) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 23:38:11 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 23:14:47 2008. 'It's a shame you're not mature enough to have an adult conversation.'I disagree, most of your comments have little to do with 'maturity', but you can still carry on an adult conversation! |
|
|
| (645354) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Mon Jul 7 06:57:31 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 23:14:47 2008. It seems that Mr. Harrison played you like a violin.PWNED. |
|
|
| (645839) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Tue Jul 8 05:35:43 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Great shots, and always good to not have to deal w/all the other ppl at say the FDR. Hope 52nd isn't taken next year :) |
|
|
| (645872) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Jul 8 08:52:52 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Grand concourse on Tue Jul 8 05:35:43 2008. thanks!may try a different location next year |
|
|
| (645992) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Tue Jul 8 16:21:39 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Tue Jul 8 08:52:52 2008. Cool! |
|
|
| (646112) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Jul 8 21:54:24 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Grand concourse on Tue Jul 8 16:21:39 2008. thanks, but I thought some were Hot shots.... |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
