| Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 (644521) | |
|
|
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
| (644521) | |
Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008 ![]() ![]() Hate it when some big guy gets in the way!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| (644522) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:28:09 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. EXCELLENT!!oh wait, those are mine...... |
|
| (644528) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Fri Jul 4 23:56:54 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:28:09 2008. I'm amazed that people stay on the el platforms to watch. Seems to be a good view and you only miss the ground show. Sharp pictures.David Harrison |
|
| (Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
| (644529) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Bill West on Fri Jul 4 23:58:35 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Fri Jul 4 23:56:54 2008. What’s the signal rule for 3 horizontal starbursts? Stop like crazy or say your prayers??Great shots, Bill |
|
| (644534) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 00:09:28 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Fri Jul 4 23:56:54 2008. the ground show looks like it would have been a welcome addition. Watching it now on tv |
|
| (644535) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 00:11:08 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Fri Jul 4 23:56:54 2008. took about 3-4 times this many photos, these are the ones that came out the best.thanks for viewing 'em! |
|
| (644536) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by 7 Local on Sat Jul 5 00:20:33 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Great pics.There was express service running today? Two trains with headlights going in the same direction in one of your pictures. |
|
| (644538) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 00:24:57 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by 7 Local on Sat Jul 5 00:20:33 2008. Thanks!trains were being stored on the middle track from Woodside towards the west |
|
| (644541) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Jul 5 00:35:28 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. I guess you weren't the only one who knows about the view from the platform. Nice. |
|
| (644542) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Bee Flexible #823 on Sat Jul 5 00:39:14 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Excellent photos all around! |
|
| (644545) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Forest Glen on Sat Jul 5 00:39:58 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. nice |
|
| (644552) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Bee Flexible #823 on Sat Jul 5 01:13:29 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Here are a few from some big guy that got in your way. :)First, the fireworks: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() And then...there were the trains. I know, I went against the flash rule for this in particular picture. But I wasn't the only 1 who did. ![]() Last but not least... ![]() Enjoy!!! |
|
| (644577) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 04:13:27 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Jul 5 00:35:28 2008. didn't know about it until I got there, thanks! |
|
| (644578) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 04:13:43 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Bee Flexible #823 on Sat Jul 5 00:39:14 2008. many thanks! |
|
| (644579) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 04:14:14 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Forest Glen on Sat Jul 5 00:39:58 2008. thank you! |
|
| (644580) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 04:16:13 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Bee Flexible #823 on Sat Jul 5 01:13:29 2008. the reason for gettin' in my shots was to get yer own great shots!thankfully, the fireworks were higher than you! |
|
| (644582) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by JBar387 on Sat Jul 5 04:32:50 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Neat Stuff! |
|
| (644587) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Sat Jul 5 06:49:09 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 00:11:08 2008. Nice pictures, thanks! |
|
| (644592) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by milan1834 on Sat Jul 5 07:57:59 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 00:11:08 2008. Not bad, mate. Out in S. F. we had fog. (I wasn't going outside anyway.) |
|
| (644596) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Sat Jul 5 08:32:07 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by milan1834 on Sat Jul 5 07:57:59 2008. Are the California fires making your air bad, still? I'm coming out to your fair city Aug. 21st. |
|
| (644597) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Jul 5 08:34:00 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by milan1834 on Sat Jul 5 07:57:59 2008. Rained in Baltimore, right up to 5 minutes before the fireworks (in the Inner Harbor) were to begin. The show went on as scheduled. |
|
| (644607) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 09:21:34 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by JBar387 on Sat Jul 5 04:32:50 2008. a clean thank you! |
|
| (644608) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 09:22:03 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by TransitChuckG on Sat Jul 5 06:49:09 2008. Great reply, thank you! |
|
| (644609) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 09:23:38 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by milan1834 on Sat Jul 5 07:57:59 2008. was raining when the works went on, so it wasn't entirely clear |
|
| (644708) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by error46146 on Sat Jul 5 13:08:27 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Excellent job with the pics !! |
|
| (644815) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 21:18:47 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by error46146 on Sat Jul 5 13:08:27 2008. thank you!did you decide on canon or panasonic? |
|
| (644912) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 00:37:53 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Fri Jul 4 23:56:54 2008. Don't be amazed. It's one of the best views you can get. And most of his photos weren't exactly sharp. |
|
| (644949) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Jul 6 01:39:41 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Nice! Thanks for posting 'em.your pal, Fred |
|
| (644965) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 02:06:14 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 00:37:53 2008. 'And most of his photos weren't exactly sharp'where are yours? |
|
| (644967) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 02:10:27 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Fred G on Sun Jul 6 01:39:41 2008. thanks!could not have done it w/o the fireworks..... |
|
| (645110) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 14:19:56 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 00:37:53 2008. Teacher: Terrapin, how do you spell crocodile?Terrapin: K-R-O-C-K-A- D -I-A-L Teacher: That's wrong Terrapin: Maybe its wrong but you asked me HOW I SPELL IT. No one asked you to butt in with comments. Facts about the good view from the platform was OK. But you don't know how I used the words "amazed" and "sharp." Do you have to try and be an authority on everything posted?? David Harrison |
|
| (645158) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 17:32:36 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 14:19:56 2008. Huh? I just said don't be amazed, because there are great views from the platforms, and many people utilize them. As for the word "sharp", if you think I'm using a different definition, then please just give yours. You don't need to add a whole story. I stopped reading it after the first line. |
|
| (645161) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jul 6 17:35:06 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 17:32:36 2008. You get obseesed with one unimportant detail, then are simply unable to process the rest of the message. |
|
| (645164) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Jul 6 17:37:14 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 02:10:27 2008. Always a team effort, light the fuse and stand back.your pal, Fred |
|
| (645166) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by R33/R36 mainline on Sun Jul 6 17:38:35 2008, in response to Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:26:11 2008. Nice pics!! |
|
| (645169) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 17:44:21 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by R33/R36 mainline on Sun Jul 6 17:38:35 2008. thank you! |
|
| (645170) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 17:46:54 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 17:32:36 2008. I am amazed. Here in Chicago we don't have that. Maybe a platform on the Lake St. side of the Loop might have a tunnel view. No the launch barges aren't far north enough for that. Now Roosevelt on the Orange/Green might get the widest view...but still too many buildings in the way. So its still amazing to me, because I've never experienced that and didn't think it could be possible.But the point is why do you feel the need to comment on what amazes me. And that's still my point. I've seen you argue about nothing with others on this forum and could never understand the WHY of it. Now its personal and I still don't understand the NEED. You posted the guy's pictures weren't sharp. I didn't say a thing about his picture quality so I see no need for your comment. Finish the story...its a good punch line. David Harrison |
|
| (645171) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 17:50:16 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 17:46:54 2008. I commented so that you know that while you thought it was something amazing, it isn't, because it is commonplace.You said "Sharp pictures." I said "most of his photos weren't exactly sharp." Where exactly is the change of definition? |
|
| (645173) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Jul 6 17:54:32 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 17:46:54 2008. he commented, because he likes to disagree with many people in order to a have a conversation or argument leading to possible flame wars. Without disagreement, he wouldn't have much of a conversation with anyone..... |
|
| (645175) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Jul 6 18:22:59 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 04:13:27 2008. Well, now that the cat's out of the bag, next year that platform will be loaded with Subtalkers!!!Great pictures by the way.
|
|
| (645176) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 18:27:21 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Jul 6 18:22:59 2008. I disagree. The fact that the fireworks are located directly behind and not far above the line of the headlights of oncoming trains makes it a poor photo location, IMHO. You would need to make very good use of the manual controls of a camera to get properly exposed shots there. |
|
| (645190) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 19:26:03 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 19:21:00 2008. I still fail to see why you take it upon yourself to define how I should feel. I am amazed, I am still amazed that people watch fireworks from an el platform and get a very good view of it. I don't care how commonplace it is...its amazing to me and will always be amazing to me because I never knew of it.You certainly have every right to be amazed after I've told you that you shouldn't be. I won't stop you. I'd guess either "having the effect of or involving a sudden brilliant display of light" or "clear in outline or detail". I assumed you meant the latter. But if you meant the former, then wouldn't all photos of fireworks be "sharp", thus making your describing them as such redundant? |
|
| (645192) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 19:28:26 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 19:26:03 2008. WrongDavid Harrison |
|
| (645193) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 19:30:18 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 19:28:26 2008. Then do tell. |
|
| (645198) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 19:43:44 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 19:30:18 2008. Now i never promised to do that, did I.David Harrison |
|
| (645200) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 19:50:25 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 19:43:44 2008. That wouldn't be nice of you. Why would you do that? I think I made a valid assumption as to the meaning of the word. If you're using some esoteric definition, then I think you should expect some questions about such. |
|
| (645202) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 20:01:11 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 19:50:25 2008. Now perhaps you see the beauty of that little tale about the crocodile. Been nice chatin' whitcha.David Harrison |
|
| (645204) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:09:52 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 20:01:11 2008. No, I didn't read that. It is not about the topic of discussion.It's unfortunate that you are acting this way. All I can say is that many of his photos were NOT sharp, contrary to what you posted. If you want to try again, be my guest. But as it stands, you made a nonsensical statement. |
|
| (645205) | |
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 20:17:17 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:09:52 2008. But as it stands, you made a nonsensical statement.The term usage by David Harrison that you have been criticizing certainly used proper sense; it had proper reference too. Perhaps you are confused? |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|