|
|
| R42's with door problem (644468) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (644468) | |
R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:50:25 2008 I just heard from Railman that an J train had door problems early. The train was removed from service an the C/R and RCI could not fix the door.These R42 are falling apart and should be reefed right away. If ENY maintain these trains this would not have happen, but the R160's are there baby now, and the R42's are the stepchild of there felt. |
|
|
| (644469) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:52:36 2008, in response to R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:50:25 2008. Well, it would soon be Pitkin's problem. |
|
|
| (644470) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:54:16 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:52:36 2008. What do you do, sit 24/7 in front of your computer to respond this fast?And your right about that, but at least Piken will fix them up right for now. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (644473) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:55:54 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:54:16 2008. LOL! Everyone says i'm fast behind the comp on subchat. I dunno, thats just how I am. Anyways Pitkin will take care of them. There fleet is pretty good. Especially since I notice them since I see there Phase I's on the Fox more often. |
|
|
| (644475) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:57:28 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:55:54 2008. As long as your only fast here and not in bed, if you know what I mean. |
|
|
| (644476) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by R33/R36 mainline on Fri Jul 4 21:57:42 2008, in response to R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:50:25 2008. Are you joking around when you said that they are falling apart and need to be reefed? Or were you being serious? |
|
|
| (644477) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:58:25 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:57:28 2008. LOL! Chill... |
|
|
| (644478) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:58:44 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by R33/R36 mainline on Fri Jul 4 21:57:42 2008. Him, he's most likely serious... |
|
|
| (644479) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:58:57 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by R33/R36 mainline on Fri Jul 4 21:57:42 2008. I am serious of couse.LOL |
|
|
| (644481) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 22:00:31 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:58:44 2008. You right about that. |
|
|
| (644483) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 22:02:07 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 22:00:31 2008. Now it's gonna kinda be hard to hang with you when you get the 160's. |
|
|
| (644487) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 22:17:21 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 22:02:07 2008. Don't worry you can still meet up with me even twhen the R160's come on line. |
|
|
| (644488) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 22:19:32 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 22:17:21 2008. lol, cool. See you and Railman out in the East soon :) |
|
|
| (644498) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 22:50:00 2008, in response to R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:50:25 2008. reefed??just for a door problem??? R U Nuts???? |
|
|
| (644510) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 23:03:47 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 22:50:00 2008. No, why can't I say it, people say the same thing about the R160's when they have something small like a door problem with them. |
|
|
| (644518) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:18:45 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 23:03:47 2008. 'why can't I say it,'if you want to say that go ahead, but I want to ask, "R U NUTS'?????? |
|
|
| (644547) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Sat Jul 5 00:45:19 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:58:57 2008. Oh yeah seriously Insane...... |
|
|
| (644570) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sat Jul 5 02:44:42 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:54:16 2008. LOL He sounds like Phil. |
|
|
| (644571) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Sat Jul 5 02:47:52 2008, in response to R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:50:25 2008. I agree. Reef them. NOW. |
|
|
| (644594) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Sat Jul 5 08:02:07 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by monorail on Fri Jul 4 23:18:45 2008. I work for the TA what do you think?I have to go take my Meds before I leave for work. |
|
|
| (644614) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sat Jul 5 09:36:07 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Sat Jul 5 08:02:07 2008. the only time I 'worked' for transit is when I would set handbrakes...... |
|
|
| (644651) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Jul 5 11:19:14 2008, in response to R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:50:25 2008. Pitkin will get them in shape. The R42's became the ENY step child the day the R143's arrived. They got the barn space, but the 42's got the quick fixes in the yard that didn't last. |
|
|
| (644653) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Jul 5 11:22:00 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 23:03:47 2008. Because as a NYCT t/o, you should know better than to make that kind of statement. |
|
|
| (644717) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by joe c on Sat Jul 5 13:33:20 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Jul 5 11:19:14 2008. I thought it was when ENY got the R160's,that's when they put the R42as a step child. til next time |
|
|
| (644763) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by BLE-NIMX on Sat Jul 5 17:41:44 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Jul 5 11:22:00 2008. Some of us learned the hard way, some of us will. |
|
|
| (644893) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 00:13:22 2008, in response to R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Fri Jul 4 21:50:25 2008. These R42 are falling apart and should be reefed right away.I disagree. Instead, they should be maintained properly and remain in faithful service. |
|
|
| (645045) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by FarRock on Sun Jul 6 10:43:28 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Jul 4 21:52:36 2008. It already is. It delayed me at Mott yesterday. CR couldn't get the doors to open. |
|
|
| (645050) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Sun Jul 6 10:57:43 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 00:13:22 2008. Ya as Fish hotels."Nimo, your room ready, a Double King, with a view of the reef. Will you be needing anything extra tonight or a wake up call in the morring?" |
|
|
| (645053) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 11:11:12 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Sun Jul 6 10:57:43 2008. I disagree. Instead, they should be maintained properly and remain in faithful human passenger subway service. |
|
|
| (645054) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Jul 6 11:12:00 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Sun Jul 6 10:57:43 2008. Ha -Looks like the R42s will remain in service on the A and C routes until they go into business under the North Atlantic.... |
|
|
| (645057) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Sun Jul 6 11:16:23 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 11:11:12 2008. You got me there, I have no good come back for that one. You have to put in Passenger Subway Serive. If you did not say that I would have said something like being used as a Diving School or something. |
|
|
| (645064) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 11:28:27 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Sun Jul 6 11:16:23 2008. haha, you're funny!:) |
|
|
| (645217) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Clayton on Sun Jul 6 20:56:50 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 00:13:22 2008. Then I think it is safe to say that you should maintain your Mazda no matter how old it is or how expensive the repairs may be until the day you die. |
|
|
| (645219) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:59:09 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Clayton on Sun Jul 6 20:56:50 2008. No, that's not true, nor is it a good explanation of what I was saying in this thread. |
|
|
| (645225) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 6 21:17:23 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Clayton on Sun Jul 6 20:56:50 2008. I agree witht he previous poster. Fuck the crews and their desire for more reliable and more comfortable cars. Fuck the passengers too. Railfans and railfan windows are the only thing that's important. |
|
|
| (645232) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by R33/R36 mainline on Sun Jul 6 21:24:12 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 6 21:17:23 2008. Aren't the R68A's more reliable than the R142/As and R143's? |
|
|
| (645236) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 21:29:58 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 6 21:17:23 2008. That's also not what I said. |
|
|
| (645247) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Jul 6 22:01:59 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by R33/R36 mainline on Sun Jul 6 21:24:12 2008. If would depend on how you measure reliability. The usual standard of measure would be MDBF. But as we know, MDBF is skewed by line and is not a pure indicator of performance. For example, the performance of R-32 Phase Is transferred to Jamaica from Pitkin has improved by a factor of 10 (June figures). What i'm saying is to accurately compare R-142s to R-68As, you'd need to run them in the same service - which we know you can't do. |
|
|
| (645315) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Mon Jul 7 00:49:49 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 11:28:27 2008. That what I was trying to be. Sorry it took so long to get back to you back it waS off the work I go after me last post. |
|
|
| (645316) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Mon Jul 7 00:53:53 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Mon Jul 7 00:49:49 2008. Was that you with the drama with another R42 being Double-O-Sixed with door problems at Myrtle? |
|
|
| (645317) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 7 00:55:21 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Mon Jul 7 00:53:53 2008. Opps forgot to do something... |
|
|
| (645344) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Mon Jul 7 05:37:51 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Clayton on Sun Jul 6 20:56:50 2008. Stop making sense, Clayton. |
|
|
| (645368) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by North-Easten T/O on Mon Jul 7 07:29:52 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 7 00:55:21 2008. NO that was not me at Myrte Ave. I wish is was.I was wondering how I posted something after I went to be. |
|
|
| (645371) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 7 07:37:09 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by North-Easten T/O on Mon Jul 7 07:29:52 2008. I was wondering how I posted something after I went to be.It was your evil twin..... ;o) |
|
|
| (645460) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Clayton on Mon Jul 7 11:45:29 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:59:09 2008. Your car door does not stay latched shut. You drop it off for a repair. The repair is done. A few months later, it does not stay latched shut. You drop it off for a repair, and the repair is done. Rinse, repeat. Rinse, repeat. |
|
|
| (645471) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Pelham Bay Dave on Mon Jul 7 12:19:01 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by G1Ravage on Sat Jul 5 02:47:52 2008. I say they should stay in service a little longer it seem like Pitkin/207 is doing a great job with those trains. |
|
|
| (645826) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Tue Jul 8 04:18:41 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by Railman718 on Mon Jul 7 00:55:21 2008. BTW, we need to talk about your little "sleepovers", uh-huh uh-huh.;-) |
|
|
| (645856) | |
Re: R42's with door problem |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Tue Jul 8 07:35:48 2008, in response to Re: R42's with door problem, posted by G1Ravage on Tue Jul 8 04:18:41 2008. In time young Padawan but you are not ready.... |
|
|
