|
|
| Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 (638852) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||
|
| (639869) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Jun 25 23:35:25 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by J trainloco on Wed Jun 25 23:29:31 2008. I'm talking about the nearer part of the future. You're right, there are more phases. |
|
|
| (639890) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 26 00:08:57 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jun 25 22:51:46 2008. Yes, I said that in response to a diversion. You win. |
|
|
| (639904) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by Russ on Thu Jun 26 00:37:36 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Wed Jun 25 21:46:03 2008. IIRC, isn't the bulk of the Javits extension funding from NYC bonds, not the MTA's funding or bonding capabilities?Yes. It is a unique funding source that in all likelihood can not be replicated in any other pat of the city. Funding the 7 extension has a little impact on other capital projects, but not much. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (639942) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Jun 26 03:37:15 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by J trainloco on Wed Jun 25 23:06:11 2008. MTAis already running 5 big projects,SAS, ESA, 7 to Javits..... what else? He is probably thinking of South Ferry and Fulton Transit Center. It should be noted that these last two are funded by federal 9/11 money. |
|
|
| (639943) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Jun 26 03:45:39 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jun 25 23:29:59 2008. LOL! |
|
|
| (639957) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Thu Jun 26 05:36:41 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 26 00:08:57 2008. You just gave him a woody. |
|
|
| (639970) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Thu Jun 26 06:22:14 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by Russ on Tue Jun 24 20:41:33 2008. And another thing with that:It needs to be remembered that Bear Stearns was still at over $100 a share as I recall on March 3. The collapse of Bear Stearns occured after that, and we know what happened there two weeks later. That likely was a huge factor in the drop in revenues in such a short time. |
|
|
| (639974) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Thu Jun 26 06:28:05 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by MJF on Tue Jun 24 20:43:15 2008. As said upthread:How much a share was Bear Stearns on March 3rd, and where was it two weeks later? That is a big reason why at least in my opinion the differences between then and now. |
|
|
| (639980) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jun 26 07:04:54 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 26 00:08:57 2008. Thanks, but no, you said it as part of normal conversation. Someone said that ventilation projects and station renovations are both important, and then you tried to imply that station renovations were less important due to the crappy quality of some aspects of some renovations. However it is clear that you have not seen RECENT renovations, which are the type that would be done. |
|
|
| (640028) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jun 26 08:50:25 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 26 00:08:57 2008. You win.When someone invites you to compete in the special olympics, that's the correct answer. :) |
|
|
| (640030) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 26 08:52:28 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jun 25 22:40:24 2008. Be sure to stop by and see me. |
|
|
| (640031) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Jun 26 08:56:51 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by MJF on Thu Jun 26 05:36:41 2008. lol |
|
|
| (640043) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jun 26 09:03:37 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by SMAZ on Thu Jun 26 03:37:15 2008. Still, even funded by federal 9/11 $$$, doesn't more projects simultaneously drive up the price of each project? |
|
|
| (640051) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jun 26 09:09:22 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by J trainloco on Wed Jun 25 22:56:09 2008. 9/11 money is also paying for part of the FTC to a certain point. But now, the current costs are on the MTA.Keep in mind that money for South Ferry and FTC could not be spent north of Canal. |
|
|
| (640343) | |
Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Jun 26 17:14:34 2008, in response to Re: Delayed until when? (was: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010), posted by MJF on Thu Jun 26 05:36:41 2008. I believe the protection boards AND the paddles are fiberglas now. :) |
|
|
| (640513) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri Jun 27 01:27:32 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jun 26 09:03:37 2008. Still, even funded by federal 9/11 $$$, doesn't more projects simultaneously drive up the price of each project?Indeed they do. |
|
|
| (640539) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Fri Jun 27 05:30:59 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by Kriston Lewis on Tue Jun 24 09:52:46 2008. I don't think we will EVER see the subways return to the state they were in back in 1980 (and I remember how bad that service really was at times back then), as that of course was caused by DECADES of deferred matinence that I don't think we'll see again. |
|
|
| (640541) | |
Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Jun 27 06:02:36 2008, in response to Re: M.T.A. Cuts Delay Some Big Projects Until 2010, posted by Wallyhorse on Fri Jun 27 05:30:59 2008. We're pretty close to a REPEAT of those economic times, and as we're all seeing now in all those retrenchments, it COULD happen again. :( |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||
