|
|
| Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave (408426) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 7 |
||
|
| (409433) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Sat Mar 31 07:33:29 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SilverFox on Sat Mar 31 04:50:57 2007. Very interesting discourse on method. |
|
|
| (409434) | |
On Topic subthread Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Sat Mar 31 07:38:00 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Russ on Fri Mar 30 22:25:05 2007. Cool map! I especially like the white gap where the continuation of the IND subway should obviously be! |
|
|
| (409437) | |
Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Sat Mar 31 08:13:01 2007, in response to Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Mar 31 07:26:41 2007. Joe King--- Joking. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (409438) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Mar 31 08:24:04 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SilverFox on Sat Mar 31 04:50:57 2007. The people on SubChat who use the sort of logic you have just used will never notice the similarity. |
|
|
| (409441) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by metropod on Sat Mar 31 09:11:13 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by mambomta on Fri Mar 30 14:23:18 2007. I though we agreed that it was 59th? |
|
|
| (409444) | |
Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Sat Mar 31 09:39:11 2007, in response to Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Mar 31 07:26:41 2007. He can be as Adam Ant as he likes about it -- he's still Joe King. |
|
|
| (409453) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Mar 31 10:59:01 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Rail Blue on Sat Mar 31 07:30:58 2007. The LATER is whom I responded to.We knew what Silver was doing..and it was a lovely piece,I might add. a SIMULAR STORY was posted here sometime ago last year,about an East End subway..and it was one of the funniest pieces I've ever read..due to its seeming so believalbe. My problem with TERRORPAIN is the fact that when He particapates in a thread..it's OFTEN LACED with VENOM.[the foamer kind]..after everyone gets tired of his foolishness. |
|
|
| (409495) | |
Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Mar 31 13:40:57 2007, in response to Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by BIE on Sat Mar 31 08:13:01 2007. I don't get it. Who is Joe King? |
|
|
| (409496) | |
Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Mar 31 13:41:36 2007, in response to Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Rail Blue on Sat Mar 31 09:39:11 2007. I liked Adam Ant when I was a kid. |
|
|
| (409501) | |
Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Sat Mar 31 13:53:52 2007, in response to Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Mar 31 13:40:57 2007. Now you are Joe King.8-) |
|
|
| (409535) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Mar 31 15:30:57 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Russ on Fri Mar 30 22:25:05 2007. That map doesn't show Lexington Ave. el trains continuing to 111th St. |
|
|
| (409590) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Sat Mar 31 19:47:43 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Mar 31 15:30:57 2007. I noticed that. Perhaps its because the Lex service to 111 St was a rush hour only operation. Another missing service on the map is the 14 St/Fulton service which was in operation by that time and if indicated, should have been shown as a subway operating all the way from Atlantic to Lefferts. Again, though that was another rush hour only operation and it might have been felt not sufficiently important to show on the map. |
|
|
| (409593) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 20:04:22 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Edwards! on Fri Mar 30 23:33:51 2007. So you are denying that you wrote, and I quote, "BIG BREAST!" referring to your wife? Haha. |
|
|
| (409594) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 20:04:59 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Fri Mar 30 18:32:21 2007. I quoted him verbatim. |
|
|
| (409596) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 20:05:41 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 18:34:17 2007. You thought wrong. |
|
|
| (409598) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 20:06:57 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Edwards! on Fri Mar 30 23:39:57 2007. Nope. You were fooled. And Douce Man was fooled. |
|
|
| (409599) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 20:07:18 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Mar 30 18:50:49 2007. Nope. |
|
|
| (409629) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by (X) 2nd Avenue Local on Sat Mar 31 20:58:56 2007, in response to Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by NewLots#2 on Wed Mar 28 23:18:42 2007. It was intended to be a continuation of the mainline to Cambria Heights with a terminal at 229th Street and Linden Blvd. It was part of the 1939 IND Second System plan. |
|
|
| (409743) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Mar 31 23:25:15 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 20:06:57 2007. Nope..you are a fool. |
|
|
| (409745) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 23:26:10 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Edwards! on Sat Mar 31 23:25:15 2007. Nope, you were fooled, just like Douce Man. Adam has pretty much said so. I don't understand why you can't see that. Everyone else sees it, LOL! |
|
|
| (409801) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by SilverFox on Sun Apr 1 01:05:53 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:01:33 2007. He was just making up crap in response to a question that most people here know the answer to and which said answer can be found at nycsubway.org with minimal effort. You get the cigar. April Fool's Day had absolutely nothing to do with it. He seems to get his jollies from such things. No, it's the reaction of a mind completely fried and rendered joyless by months and years of being marinated in bullshit. Just like my responses to that graffiti rap video. But yes, on the basest level, it is kinda fun. Douce Man has not yet learned that. But that shouldn't matter, because he very well knows where that line was supposed to go. He should have realized it was BS in about 3 seconds. Instead, being Douce Man, he entertained the possibility that there was some truth to it, even though it flies in the face of all reason . . . There's no hope for this guy. I think you got played by yourself on your inflated sense of superiority here. For all I know, he was jokingly playing the straight man and you jumped on him showing how superior you are when all you did was punch at ghosts. Or, the two of you knew exactly what I was onto and were play-fighting to see how others, including I, would react. In that case, well done, guys! You got me. |
|
|
| (409807) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 01:40:28 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SilverFox on Sun Apr 1 01:05:53 2007. You get the cigar. April Fool's Day had absolutely nothing to do with it.Thanks! I knew it. But yes, on the basest level, it is kinda fun. Yep, I knew it. I think you got played by yourself on your inflated sense of superiority here. For all I know, he was jokingly playing the straight man and you jumped on him showing how superior you are when all you did was punch at ghosts. Nope, not at all. I wasn't the first to point out that he was wrong, and I won't be the last. Based on countless other posts in other threads, I do believe that Douce Man was being 100% serious. |
|
|
| (409829) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Apr 1 02:40:41 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 23:26:10 2007. 'Everyone else sees it, LOL!'sees what? |
|
|
| (409833) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:44:07 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:33:03 2007. Is this your April Fool's joke? You sure are dragging it out, if so. |
|
|
| (409836) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:45:01 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Mar 29 13:36:04 2007. Early AF joke. |
|
|
| (409843) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 02:49:33 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:44:07 2007. No, he's 100% serious. Sad, isn't it? |
|
|
| (409844) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 02:50:22 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:45:01 2007. No, it's not. Read the whole thread before replying. |
|
|
| (409847) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:52:23 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 02:50:22 2007. UR R0NGToo close to AFD for you to say that. |
|
|
| (409850) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 02:53:17 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:52:23 2007. Once again, NO, READ THE WHOLE THREAD BEFORE POSTING. You are making a complete fool of yourself... |
|
|
| (409855) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:56:26 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 02:53:17 2007. Stop talking to yourself. |
|
|
| (409857) | |
Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:57:10 2007, in response to Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sat Mar 31 13:41:36 2007. Was it the lip gloss? |
|
|
| (409873) | |
Re::: ;;Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Apr 1 04:31:30 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 01:40:28 2007. I thought that he was 100% serious in the beginning, but now I'm not so sure. Maybe he was just going along with the joke? Douce is right that it is sometimes hard to tell whether or not someone is joking on the internet. |
|
|
| (409915) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 09:04:00 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Apr 1 02:56:26 2007. I'm not. Once again, NO, READ THE WHOLE THREAD BEFORE POSTING. You are making a complete fool of yourself... |
|
|
| (409916) | |
Re::: ;;Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 09:07:17 2007, in response to Re::: ;;Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Easy on Sun Apr 1 04:31:30 2007. It is sometimes hard. But in the case of SilverFox and in the case of Douce Man, it is not hard at all. Douce Man was and still is being 100% serious. Sad, isn't it? |
|
|
| (409922) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Apr 1 09:14:44 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Mar 30 20:45:37 2007. No kidding or at least uhhh..."get a grip!"your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (409982) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Apr 1 11:29:41 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by metropod on Sat Mar 31 09:11:13 2007. ["I though we agreed that it was 59th?"]
|
|
|
| (409999) | |
Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:33:53 2007, in response to Re: SILVER FOX WAS JOE KING Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by BIE on Sat Mar 31 08:13:01 2007. At least it wasn't his cousin Foo! :-) |
|
|
| (410001) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:35:22 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Rail Blue on Fri Mar 30 13:36:50 2007. Sooner or later he'll answer. |
|
|
| (410002) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:38:18 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by metropod on Sat Mar 31 09:11:13 2007. Actually the picture was taken at 7th Avenue and 53 Street. |
|
|
| (410003) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:41:54 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Mar 31 20:05:41 2007. I thought a few things about you.I was wrong about that. |
|
|
| (410004) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 12:42:33 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:35:22 2007. He already did. You just can't see that. He actually answered TWICE. Wake up and READ THE THREAD. |
|
|
| (410005) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 12:43:28 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:41:54 2007. You are often wrong. But it is ok if you apologize and learn from it. Thank you. |
|
|
| (410006) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:45:53 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 12:43:28 2007. I'm sorry about the things I thought about you. |
|
|
| (410007) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:49:37 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 30 20:43:17 2007. And unlike cable we usually keep it clean it here. |
|
|
| (410009) | |
Re::: -Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:55:05 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SilverFox on Sat Mar 31 04:54:41 2007. So there was some truth to what you've claimed? |
|
|
| (410010) | |
Re:Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 12:56:36 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:49:37 2007. Actually it is pretty sad here. |
|
|
| (410011) | |
Re::: -Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 12:56:56 2007, in response to Re::: -Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:55:05 2007. No, there wasn't. |
|
|
| (410012) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:59:23 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SilverFox on Sat Mar 31 04:50:57 2007. At least you weren't attempting sn April Fool's Joke.Hopefully some people in here read it. |
|
|
| (410019) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Apr 1 13:02:29 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:59:23 2007. At least you weren't attempting sn April Fool's Joke.I told you that days ago. |
|
|
| (410022) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by jimmymc25 on Sun Apr 1 13:06:25 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Sun Apr 1 12:45:53 2007. Now I think you're Joe King!Jimmymc25 |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 7 |
||
