|
|
| Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave (408426) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 7 |
||
|
| (409031) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 10:39:48 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Mar 29 14:00:13 2007. I don't consider myself fooled.Just wondering what Silver Fox said and where did he read about it. |
|
|
| (409032) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Fytton on Fri Mar 30 10:41:53 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 10:39:48 2007. Lighten up, Douce Man! You still haven't got the point, have you? Silver Fox didn't read anything, he made it up. It's a joke! |
|
|
| (409034) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 10:43:41 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by NewLots#2 on Thu Mar 29 17:13:50 2007. I also heard there was a Trans-Atlantic rail line from the US to England. Built during the 1940s. An interesting story considering the war. But I don't believe that story one bit. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (409035) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Fytton on Fri Mar 30 10:45:32 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 10:43:41 2007. Just remind me - in which nebula is the planet Douce situated? |
|
|
| (409036) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 10:45:37 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Fri Mar 30 09:50:32 2007. The Chunnel would be a part of a world-wide train system. |
|
|
| (409037) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 10:48:38 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 10:39:48 2007. But you WERE fooled. And you just admitted it for like the twelfth time. |
|
|
| (409038) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 10:49:50 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Fytton on Fri Mar 30 10:45:32 2007. I feel bad for him but he resists any help directed toward him in the area of enhancing his common sense and reasoning abilities. |
|
|
| (409042) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:01:15 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by SilverFox on Thu Mar 29 23:46:22 2007. "Where did I get all of this? Are you actually questioning my facts? Please."I'm sure alot of us are wondering where did you hear about this? I don't believe such a line to Montauk was ever planned. No matter what Brian has said. Considering your past postings about the subway, I try to keep an open mind about it. Maybe you're pulling an April Fool's Prank. Are you? |
|
|
| (409043) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:01:33 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Fri Mar 30 09:49:01 2007. SilverFox didn't post a joke, or more correctly, he wasn't trying to fool anyone. He was just making up crap in response to a question that most people here know the answer to and which said answer can be found at nycsubway.org with minimal effort. He seems to get his jollies from such things. While almost all of us knew before even clicking on the post that it would contain nothing factual (because that is SilverFox's style of late, Douce Man has not yet learned that. But that shouldn't matter, because he very well knows where that line was supposed to go. He should have realized it was BS in about 3 seconds. Instead, being Douce Man, he entertained the possibility that there was some truth to it, even though it flies in the face of all reason. THEN, when we tell him that the post was not factual, he doesn't listen to us and insists on waiting for confirmation from SilverFox. There's no hope for this guy. |
|
|
| (409045) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:06:26 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:01:15 2007. I'm sure alot of us are wondering where did you hear about this?Are you blind? I've told you several times that: YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE WHO WAS FOOLED BY SILVERFOX. NO ONE ELSE BELIEVED A SINGLE BIT OF IT AFTER READING IT. IT WASN'T EVEN DESIGNED TO FOOL ANYONE SINCE IT WAS SO PREPOSTEROUS.
|
|
|
| (409046) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:07:00 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Fytton on Fri Mar 30 10:41:53 2007. Is something wrong with hoping Silver Fox would prove what he said or admit he was pulling a fast one? |
|
|
| (409048) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:08:42 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 10:48:38 2007. And I've said I'm wondering if he read something we don't know of or is he pulling an April Fool's Prank? |
|
|
| (409049) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:11:35 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:06:26 2007. Thank you Brian being a spokesman for Silver Fox.I wanted to hear from the horse's mooth and I'm answered my the other end. |
|
|
| (409051) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:19:26 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:07:00 2007. Yes, because neither was necessary. It was OBVIOUS that what he wrote was complete bullsh_t. He was neither telling the truth nor pulling a fast one. He was just trying to amuse himself and possibly others. |
|
|
| (409052) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:20:50 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:08:42 2007. And as I've said you don't need to wonder that. I told you yesterday that it was obviously complete bullsh_t. And it's NOT A PRANK. Something that is completely obviously false is not a prank. |
|
|
| (409053) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:22:36 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:11:35 2007. I'm not speaking for him. I'm telling you a fact. It is 100% factual that what he wrote was not true. Everyone, EVERYONE, except you, knew it as soon as they read it. What does that tell you? |
|
|
| (409055) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Fri Mar 30 11:24:49 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:08:42 2007. Are you serious or are you just trying to annoy Terrapin? |
|
|
| (409056) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:27:47 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by TunnelRat on Thu Mar 29 14:27:43 2007. Let us know IF that day will be. |
|
|
| (409057) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Mar 30 11:32:37 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by J trainloco on Fri Mar 30 00:09:48 2007. You need to get a sense of humor. |
|
|
| (409058) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:33:03 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Easy on Fri Mar 30 11:24:49 2007. I'm just wondering if Silver Fox is serious or not.I'm not trying to annoy anyone. Terrapin finds it neccessary to answer me. |
|
|
| (409059) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:34:26 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Easy on Fri Mar 30 11:24:49 2007. He's dead serious, trust me. And I'm not the least bit annoyed. I'm throughly amused. Though I do feel a bit bad for laughing at someone like...him. But not so bad, because he refuses our help. |
|
|
| (409061) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:38:05 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:33:03 2007. Correct. This is a forum. Traditionally people post questions, and anyone who knows the answer, answers. You posted a question, I posted the answer (after GIS Man did first), and several others confirmed my answer. It is your choice to not accept my answer, but this has to be one of, if not THE, dumbest things I've ever seen you do on this board. And you've done some pretty dumb things. |
|
|
| (409064) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:40:25 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Mar 30 11:32:37 2007. Huh? SilverFox's post wasn't funny at all. The only thing funny about this is that Douce Man was fooled. Well, ok, there is more more funny thing about this: the fact that Douce Man is STILL fooled. |
|
|
| (409067) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:45:24 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:38:05 2007. "It is your choice to not accept my answer."I'd prefer to hear Silver Fox's answer. He made the statement. |
|
|
| (409069) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:47:17 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:40:25 2007. I don't and never believed Silver Fox's post.I'm just wondering where did he get his infomation. |
|
|
| (409071) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Mar 30 11:48:00 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:40:25 2007. You have to admire Adam's effort. To the layman, it sounds very authentic. |
|
|
| (409072) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Fri Mar 30 11:48:56 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:33:03 2007. SilverFox's post was so ridiculous that you shouldn't need to hear him state whether or not he was serious...but it's your prerogative so good luck with that! |
|
|
| (409073) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:52:08 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:45:24 2007. But you can't always get what you want. And I figured he would never answer you straight anyway, and guess what, I was right! He gave you an even more bullsh_t response than his original post, AND YOU'RE STILL WONDERING IF HE IS BEING SERIOUS OR NOT. Hello, GET A CLUE. |
|
|
| (409075) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:54:40 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 11:47:17 2007. Um, if you didn't believe it, then you'd know that he got his information from...himself! Duh! By actually thinking that he may have gotten it somewhere, you're admitting that you think that there may be truth in what he wrote. |
|
|
| (409076) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:56:28 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Mar 30 11:48:00 2007. It totally does. He's an excellent writer. But the people here are way too smart for that, and he knows it. That's why I think he wrote it to simply amuse himself. An unintended effect was that he fooled Douce Man. |
|
|
| (409078) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Mar 30 11:59:12 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by J trainloco on Fri Mar 30 00:09:48 2007. You are the one who needs a life. Adam wrote satire, and it was one of his best works. |
|
|
| (409080) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:01:07 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Easy on Fri Mar 30 11:48:56 2007. It's difficult in a forum like this to know when someone is being serious of sarcastic unless they add some smilies. |
|
|
| (409082) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:07:02 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:52:08 2007. "But you can't always get what you want."But if you try sometimes, you get what you need. |
|
|
| (409083) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:07:57 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Mar 30 11:59:12 2007. You are the one who needs a lifeIncorrect. J trainloco has a life and is a model member of this community. He contributes a lot and asks a lot of good questions. OTOH, Adam, as of late, has done nothing for this board, except provide me with the entertainment of watching Douce Man make more of a fool of himself than he's ever done before. Adam wrote satire Tell that to Douce Man. |
|
|
| (409085) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:09:11 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 11:54:40 2007. There might be some truth.I really doubt it. |
|
|
| (409086) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:09:42 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:01:07 2007. It's difficult in a forum like this to know when someone is being serious of sarcastic unless they add some smilies.Why do you say that when EVERYONE ELSE BESIDES YOU knew instantly the second they read part or all of it that it was complete BS? |
|
|
| (409087) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:10:37 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:07:57 2007. I'd prefer to hear Adam to tell me that. |
|
|
| (409091) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:11:11 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:07:02 2007. Exactly. You got what you needed: the answer. You didn't get what you wanted: to hear it from Adam. |
|
|
| (409092) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:12:07 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:09:11 2007. No, there is no truth to it. And we have told you that many, many, many times. You know exactly where to get the truth. Go check it. |
|
|
| (409093) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:12:41 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:09:42 2007. I thought along those same lines myself.I'd like to hear confirmation fromm the horse's mouth instead of talking to the other end. |
|
|
| (409094) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:13:37 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:10:37 2007. I know. That's because you seem to not be very bright. I'm sorry to have to tell you that. I wish I didn't have to. But you leave me no choice. Accept what everyone else is telling you and stop making a fool of yourself. |
|
|
| (409095) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:15:30 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:11:11 2007. I'd repeat about the horse's mouth,But the joke is only good for so long. |
|
|
| (409096) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:18:01 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:12:07 2007. And I've said many, many, many times I'd like to know where he got his infomation. If he can provide it. |
|
|
| (409097) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:19:28 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:12:41 2007. You aren't talking to the other end. You are hearing the truth from several individuals. Why would you have any reason to doubt that? My guess is because you are not bright, and I've accepted that. That's why I try to help you. |
|
|
| (409098) | |
Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:20:39 2007, in response to Re: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:15:30 2007. Exactly. You got what you needed: the answer. You didn't get what you wanted: to hear it from Adam.What about the above do you not understand? |
|
|
| (409099) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:21:06 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:13:37 2007. Adam made a statement.Either he confirms it or admits he pulled a fast one. |
|
|
| (409100) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:24:28 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:18:01 2007. And as we've told you many, many, many times, he didn't get it from anywhere! He made it up! It's completely obvious! You were the only one fooled! |
|
|
| (409101) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Mar 30 12:26:15 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:21:06 2007. Let me give you a more respectful answer than what Terror-pin is saying.Adam wrote satire. None of it was true, and the MTA probably has NEVER even though of such a plan. Therefore you just have to understand that it was all fantasy what Adam said. |
|
|
| (409110) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:40:45 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Mar 30 12:21:06 2007. He doesn't need to confirm it since it is not true. And he didn't pull a fast one because it was too outrageous to be believable. You were the only one fooled, and that was totally unintended on his part. He owes you nothing, lol. |
|
|
| (409113) | |
Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Mar 30 12:43:29 2007, in response to Re::: Tracks beyond Euclid Ave, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Mar 30 12:26:15 2007. I gave him a very respectful answer. He did not accept it. Many others gave him very respectable answers. He did not accept those. And now you think that you are so high and mighty that you can give him a much more respectable answer - one that he will accept? You might be as dumb as him.Furthermore, the MTA has never thought of such a plan. I don't know why you wrote "probably". Anyone at the MTA who seriously submitted such an idea would have been fired before it got very far. |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 7 |
||
