|
|
| Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. (338552) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 6 |
||
|
| (338924) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:36:45 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by tydev417 on Wed Nov 15 21:26:22 2006. When did I use the words "ever so greatly improve"?They are not of "very little importance". For example, they likely rank MUCH higher in importance than the announcement that "bags and other large containers are subject to random search", and that is repeated thousands of times per day. |
|
|
| (338926) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:39:00 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by tydev417 on Wed Nov 15 21:34:41 2006. You wrote "Jeez, have you ever had someone jam their foot on your back to know how it feels?"I took that to mean that you DID know how it feels. If I was mistaken then I apologize. |
|
|
| (338928) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Nov 15 22:43:40 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 19:00:25 2006. Note "slightly."On the R142s the HVAC is already abysmal, so it makes little difference. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (338929) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 22:44:20 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 21:27:19 2006. Well, he considers them a positive aspect of her. Why not? |
|
|
| (338930) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:45:36 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Nov 15 21:52:42 2006. COMPLETELY FALSE |
|
|
| (338931) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 22:45:52 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Nov 15 22:43:40 2006. I wouldn't call it abysmal. I've ridden 142s in summer and found trhem very comfortable. Of course any given train could have a problem. |
|
|
| (338932) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 22:47:29 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:45:36 2006. That's 100% of your posting? You need to work a little harder. |
|
|
| (338935) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:50:05 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by tydev417 on Wed Nov 15 21:37:11 2006. No, they feel like uncomfortable seats.No I didn't. |
|
|
| (338936) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:50:32 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Broadway Lion on Wed Nov 15 22:07:24 2006. Good idea. |
|
|
| (338937) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:51:05 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R4 Bryn Mawr LCL/R5 Paoli EXP on Wed Nov 15 21:32:13 2006. Maybe. Check craigslist. |
|
|
| (338938) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:51:33 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Nov 15 21:33:46 2006. Word is getting around about that... |
|
|
| (338939) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Nov 15 22:52:00 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:03:48 2006. I voice my opinions based on my experience and all you can do is flame and antagonize me. When I say that you're as bad as RON IN BS in terms of making personal attacks towards others, this is what I'm talking about! You are always in denial about your trolling. Stop being a hypocrite! |
|
|
| (338941) | |
why not "rebirth" R110b design in R160ies? |
|
|
Posted by tramrunner on Wed Nov 15 22:54:53 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Subterranean Railway on Wed Nov 15 18:58:21 2006. will it need the model to be re-tested for another 30 days? |
|
|
| (338942) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:55:30 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Nov 15 22:52:00 2006. OMG! You are trying to use your actions to describe how everyone must act! And I'm saying you're wrong! YOU might sit down, but many others LOVE the RFW and make you of it as much as they can! As such, the loss of it IS A BIG DEAL! |
|
|
| (338943) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:55:50 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Nov 15 22:52:00 2006. OMG! You are trying to use your actions to describe how everyone must act! And I'm saying you're wrong! YOU might sit down, but many others LOVE the RFW and make use of it as much as they can! As such, the loss of it IS A BIG DEAL! |
|
|
| (338945) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 22:57:09 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Nov 15 21:33:46 2006. Oh yeah..Damn skippy. |
|
|
| (338949) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 22:58:53 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Nov 15 22:52:00 2006. Umm humm. |
|
|
| (338953) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 22:59:59 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by tydev417 on Wed Nov 15 19:37:45 2006. Nobody's calling it a necessity.But I think it's very much in NYCT's interest for members of the public who happen to be curious about how the system works to satisfy their curiosity, and a railfan window is one obvious means to that end. I've helped quite a few confused passengers when a train ends up on a track it normally doesn't use if I happen to know where that track leads. And how do I know where that track leads? Not by blindly memorizing a book of track maps, that's for sure. So it's not a necessity, but it would certainly be a desireable feature to maintain. |
|
|
| (338957) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:03:26 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by tydev417 on Wed Nov 15 20:41:29 2006. Really?Let me make this crystal clear. When I sit down on an R-142 seat, the seat jabs me sharply in the back, at a point where my back does not bend. It is about as uncomfortable as a seat could possibly be. It appears from this thread that I'm not the only one who does not fit into the R-142 seat. You do? Mazel tov. But for the rest of us, it's awful. |
|
|
| (338959) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:03:41 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 22:47:29 2006. False. |
|
|
| (338961) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:04:36 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by tydev417 on Wed Nov 15 21:26:22 2006. Notoriety? |
|
|
| (338962) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:04:36 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R4 Bryn Mawr LCL/R5 Paoli EXP on Wed Nov 15 21:32:13 2006. If I was..{which I'd NEVER DO]..it wouldn't be You I would be inviting.Becides..your half the man I am.. I know for a FACT that WHINEBURG is. |
|
|
| (338963) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:05:58 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 22:44:20 2006. I love the wife,man..Very much. Everything about her. |
|
|
| (338964) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:06:18 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 22:45:52 2006. Then you obviously weren't standing on a crowded train near the end of the car. |
|
|
| (338965) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:07:23 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:05:58 2006. Very cool! |
|
|
| (338967) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:07:46 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:06:18 2006. Yes, I was. |
|
|
| (338970) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Nov 15 23:09:33 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 22:55:30 2006. What are you talking about about? I voice my opinion and you say I'm wrong because you don't agree with me! Jeez! Get a grip! The world is not going to end because of the demise of the RFW! |
|
|
| (338974) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:11:39 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:04:36 2006. How so? |
|
|
| (338975) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:13:08 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:07:46 2006. Obviously you weren't. The R-142 and/or A A/C works great when the car is empty and ok when full, but only if you are in them middle of the car. The A/C does not at all reach the ends of the car when it is mildly to overly crowded. |
|
|
| (338976) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:14:35 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Nov 15 23:09:33 2006. The RFW is much more important than you make it out to be. That is a fact. It is important to many people. That is a fact. |
|
|
| (338978) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:15:56 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Nov 15 22:43:40 2006. If you're sitting in the middle of the car, at least you benefit from a fan strongly blowing moderately cool air on you. At the end of the car, you get nothing. |
|
|
| (338982) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:18:23 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:14:35 2006. This IS a FACT. You ARE a troll. THAT is a FACT. |
|
|
| (338983) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:18:34 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:07:46 2006. Either you're fabricating the facts (as usual) or you still think that a car is crowded if more than half of its seats are filled. |
|
|
| (338986) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:20:36 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:18:34 2006. Neither. Crowded car, barely standing room enough; I'm standing at the end.Not every trip was like that. But some were, and I never felt uncomfortable, temperature wise (naturally, I would have liked a seat). |
|
|
| (338987) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:20:37 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:18:23 2006. If I'm a troll about the RFW then you're a troll about your wife's big breasts/juggs. |
|
|
| (338989) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:21:41 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:20:36 2006. Then you obviously weren't at the ends of heavily crowded cars. |
|
|
| (338990) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:22:19 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:21:41 2006. Yes, I was. |
|
|
| (338993) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:23:44 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:20:37 2006. The difference is that his wife loves him and his sense of humor. No matter how hard you rub against the RFW it will never love you.Appreciate Tamar! |
|
|
| (338994) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:24:28 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:22:19 2006. Then you are lying about the condition of the air. |
|
|
| (338996) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:25:40 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:15:56 2006. False. You get the bebefit of efficiently circulated air. Except if your last name is Greenberger. Then the C/R makes sure you get no air at all. :0) |
|
|
| (338997) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:26:16 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:24:28 2006. No, I'm not. |
|
|
| (338998) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:26:46 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:25:40 2006. If there is no airduct for 15 feet, how are you getting efficiently circulated air? |
|
|
| (338999) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:26:53 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:13:08 2006. False. It does. |
|
|
| (339000) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:29:54 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:26:16 2006. Then you have a different sense of comfortable air then most other people I know... |
|
|
| (339001) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:30:28 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:26:46 2006. You don't need an air duct right next to you to do that. I've been in that position. I'm not saying that being right under the air duct isn't better; I'm saying I've never felt uncomfortable.It could well be that the car David was riding in had bad A/C. I was not on his car. If he says he was uncomfortable, I believe him. But I do not believe his generalization, because my personal experience with it does not support it. |
|
|
| (339004) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:31:12 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:29:54 2006. That's possible. |
|
|
| (339006) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:34:08 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:20:37 2006. Heh..Man..you Must be a child. If I had to choose between the two....it wouldn't be a choice. |
|
|
| (339009) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:40:18 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:30:28 2006. My personal experience of riding the R142/As every day for 5 years follows exactly what david says. They are abysmal at car ends, and are abysmal when there are more then a few people standing.More evidence that the MTA finds the R142 air circulation to be poor is the fact that they put in strong vents at the ends of cars on the R143. |
|
|
| (339010) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:40:54 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 23:21:41 2006. This isn't the first time he's been caught fabricating the facts, and I doubt it will be the last. |
|
|
| (339012) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:44:54 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:26:46 2006. If the air conditioning system actually lowers the temperature in the car to an appreciable degree, then the duct placement isn't terribly critical.But if the air coming out of the HVAC system isn't really very cool at all, and it only feels cool when a strong fan blows it directly at you, then anybody who isn't in the direct airflow of a duct is out of luck. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 6 |
||
