|
|
| Re: 7 train tagged in service! (318514) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 12 |
||
|
| (318663) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:51:09 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:40:31 2006. You misspelled "disgusting". |
|
|
| (318664) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:52:40 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. Time to bring this man back. |
|
|
| (318665) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 20:57:00 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:49:54 2006. Well Ihope they do. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (318666) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 20:57:18 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:50:37 2006. And? |
|
|
| (318667) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 20:57:35 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:51:09 2006. I don't think so. |
|
|
| (318668) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by R42 4787 on Tue Oct 3 21:05:27 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. Quite lucky that the R62A body panels are stainless steel and not painted aluminum-which is even more graffiti-prone as shown on London Underground. |
|
|
| (318670) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Wayne-MrSlantR40 on Tue Oct 3 21:10:16 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. And we really thought it went away, did we? NOT!-Wayne- |
|
|
| (318673) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:19:02 2006, in response to Re: I SMELL A RAT!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:19:38 2006. 'Would it make sense for a person to mess with his camera's date and time settings just for one photograph? ' do you know for a fact that it was just set for 1 photo???? |
|
|
| (318675) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:21:14 2006, in response to Re: I SMELL A RAT!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:21:05 2006. 'Why would a digital camera be set to a future date?' perhaps they don't know how to properly set it.... many tourists do not know how to turn off the flash |
|
|
| (318676) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:22:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Oct 3 18:13:47 2006. ' We had enough of that horror, thank you'speak for yourself... to me, it was not a 'horror' |
|
|
| (318678) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Wayne-MrSlantR40 on Tue Oct 3 21:23:15 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:40:31 2006. Needs a little more yellow in the accents. And the tagger seems to have trouble making his letters understood, unless this tag is purely symbolic.-w- |
|
|
| (318682) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:26:34 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 18:29:57 2006. 'crack dealers on every corner.'perhaps what you experienced, but they were not on 'every' corner |
|
|
| (318683) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Oct 3 21:26:56 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:22:47 2006. speak for yourself...to me, it was not a 'horror' Remember "Welcome Back Kotter"? They showed the nasty trains there in the credits. |
|
|
| (318684) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:27:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:49:02 2006. 'No such thing as "nice tags". 'what about the ones on birthday presents???? |
|
|
| (318686) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:28:39 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 19:19:05 2006. Damn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| (318687) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:29:23 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Clayton on Tue Oct 3 19:31:46 2006. IAWTP |
|
|
| (318688) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 21:30:14 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:26:34 2006. Of course, but in some neighborhoods, it's not that wild a description. Alphabet City in the early 80's literally had open drug dealing on EVERY corner. |
|
|
| (318689) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:31:52 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 19:51:15 2006. 'I don't want to see more and more of the fleet fall back into the 80s'I'd rather see the fleet from the '80's fall into the 2000's |
|
|
| (318690) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:32:09 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:49:02 2006. So if someone were to tag an actual work of art, or an image of say, the Hudson Valley onto a subway car, it wouldn't be nice? Sorry, but you need to realize that some graffiti is actually tasteful. Yeah, it's vandalism in this case, which I'm not supporting by any means, but I atleast have sense enough to recognize the artistic ability of the vandal |
|
|
| (318692) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:32:40 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:49:30 2006. Well then grand wizzard, do tell, where was this car layed up? |
|
|
| (318694) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:33:21 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Oct 3 20:00:35 2006. 'It hurt the taxpayers whose money was used to clean it up. ' many things the city pays for hurts us, so what's one more thing? |
|
|
| (318696) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:33:41 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:32:09 2006. IDAWTP, because plane old steel is very dull. |
|
|
| (318698) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:34:26 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Oct 3 20:26:19 2006. 'How many trains do you see today with graffiti? Few or none.'what is seen on the windows, is quite similar to graffiti |
|
|
| (318700) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:35:04 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:45:27 2006. 'Well said'what did the well say??????? |
|
|
| (318702) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:35:52 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Oct 3 21:26:56 2006. I agree. While I do think many graffiti works are tasteful, such as this one, the 80s was a horrible time for the subways, and vandalism was a big reason. Trains were covered in graffiti, most of which were pointless tags, not even bubble letters. |
|
|
| (318703) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:36:19 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 20:57:00 2006. we need more, more, more!!!! |
|
|
| (318704) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 21:36:59 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Wado MP73 on Tue Oct 3 18:14:21 2006. Anyone born after 1984 probably cannot relate to what you're saying. I'm sure people had this reaction to grafitti when the epidemic started in the early 1970's, but by 1980, I'm sure they had seen enough. |
|
|
| (318705) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:37:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:52:40 2006. pies and rotten tomatoes await........ |
|
|
| (318706) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:37:57 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:36:19 2006. yes, Yes, YES!!! |
|
|
| (318707) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Wayne-MrSlantR40 on Tue Oct 3 21:38:35 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by R42 4787 on Tue Oct 3 21:05:27 2006. That surface will clean up quite nicely. And yes, I've seen some bloomin' masterpieces on LU stock, especially on the 72 MKII and the C69/77s.wayne |
|
|
| (318708) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:39:14 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:33:21 2006. Wo, now that's not the right attitude at all. I would want to eliminate as many things as possible from the list of reasons my taxes would be so high, or list of reasons for raising my taxes. Even eliminating one thing at a time works. It's better than saying, hey, we're already spending a shitload of money, lets spend a couple more thousand bucks. |
|
|
| (318709) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:39:17 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:35:52 2006. to each his/her own.......... |
|
|
| (318711) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 21:40:11 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Oct 3 21:26:56 2006. The "Equalizer" intro shows the #1 line at rock bottom. It makes the trains used for "The Warriors" look positively spic-n-span in comparison. |
|
|
| (318712) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:40:18 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 21:30:14 2006. 'Alphabet City in the early 80's literally had open drug dealing on EVERY corner'at least you knew where to go to get it......... |
|
|
| (318714) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:41:35 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:33:41 2006. 'plane old steel is very dull'shine it up, then 'plane old steel' what about boat old steel? |
|
|
| (318715) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:41:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:33:41 2006. Uhmm, that argument was kind of more towards your side. Nice goingAnd regardless of how dull the steel is, the point is that it is vandalism and it should not be tolerated. If you remember a few monthes back, I am MORE than supportive of having the MTA participate in a program where certain graffiti artists would be allowed to spray paint murals on one car each. This though, as much as I like it, is vandalism, and like I said, should not be tolerated. Photograph it and get rid of it. Sorry. |
|
|
| (318718) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:42:45 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:32:40 2006. 'Well then grand wizzard'the grand wizard of wrestling was an excellent dresser, and a favorite manager of mine |
|
|
| (318719) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:43:07 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:41:35 2006. What ever dude, even shiny steel like the Concourse R68's are boring. |
|
|
| (318720) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:43:38 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:40:18 2006. I do too! |
|
|
| (318721) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Wayne-MrSlantR40 on Tue Oct 3 21:43:51 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:34:26 2006. (re: window marking, scratching and etching)It IS a form of graffiti. Just done using different media. wayne |
|
|
| (318722) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:44:00 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:41:47 2006. Well, I get the photograph, and then they can get rid of it. |
|
|
| (318725) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:45:16 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Tue Oct 3 21:39:14 2006. 'Wo, now that's not the right attitude at all' okay, let's say that if graffiti is found like the one in the photo, we leave it there rather than spend money to clean it off |
|
|
| (318727) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Wayne-MrSlantR40 on Tue Oct 3 21:45:19 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:42:45 2006. I liked Capt Lou better.=w= |
|
|
| (318728) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:46:36 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 21:40:11 2006. 'The "Equalizer" intro shows the #1 line at rock bottom' don't think I've ever seen a subway car at 'Rock Bottom' what does a subway car have to do with a drug store anyway???? |
|
|
| (318729) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Oct 3 21:46:37 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:39:17 2006. ZERO Tollerence.1) No Grafitti on the road. 2) Arrest, prosecution, fines AND jail time for perps. ROAR |
|
|
| (318731) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:48:13 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Wayne-MrSlantR40 on Tue Oct 3 21:45:19 2006. Ayatollah Blassie was just as good |
|
|
| (318732) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Oct 3 21:48:15 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:33:41 2006. If that's the case then we should bring back the blue stripe (which would be much nicer looking than graffiti, murals or otherwise.) |
|
|
| (318735) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Oct 3 21:48:53 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:48:49 2006. If you work for NYCT you do not *have* an opinion. |
|
|
| (318737) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 21:49:09 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Broadway Lion on Tue Oct 3 21:46:37 2006. 'No Grafitti on the road.'there is plenty on the road, check the tunnel walls |
|
|
| (318739) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 21:49:29 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Oct 3 21:48:15 2006. THAT is a VERY good idea!!! |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 12 |
||
