Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) (46004) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 3 of 3 |
(46547) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 13:12:16 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Feb 2 12:50:42 2005. Ok, well so much for at least a longer C train at longer headways.I still say they shoulda kept the V and run more A trains rather than cut back the V and run A/C at partial service. But then the fools that loves their C trains so much better not cry for mommy that service sucks now. Yeah an 8-car train at longer headways over a 10-car train at decent headways was worth it for a letter and destination. |
|
(46555) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 13:29:21 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 11:23:07 2005. Fact is that ridership at the particular stations served by the C has changed over the years.Fact is that weekend C trains are often crush loaded (today, in 2005). Fact is that NYCT's weekend loading standard does not call for crush loaded trains. Fact is that there is an easy way to solve the problem at very small cost. Two ways, in fact. The service pattern that made sense 70 years ago may not be the service pattern that makes sense now. There's no reason to blindly stick with a 70-year-old service pattern. |
|
(46557) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 13:30:24 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Feb 2 11:39:35 2005. What tragedy? The WTC station is oriented north-south under Church Street. The only station inside the bathtub is Cortlandt on the 1/9. |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(46561) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Feb 2 13:32:45 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 13:30:24 2005. Hmmmm. I thought the WTC station would extend into the PATH station area or something. |
|
(46564) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 13:35:30 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Feb 2 13:32:45 2005. Nope it would extend directly to the R/W lines.PATH I think was just next to the street, but under the WTC complex. |
|
(46568) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 13:41:44 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by H.S.Relay on Wed Feb 2 06:48:11 2005. Yes, but IME, Jay ignores it (or at least Jay ignored it on Friday when I was hanging out there and listening in).But it's only one punch, for Fulton trains. |
|
(46572) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Feb 2 13:56:05 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by H.S.Relay on Wed Feb 2 06:48:11 2005. There is a punch at the S/E of the S/B platform at High Street. So I'd assume there is one like it at York Street. |
|
(46588) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 14:32:16 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 13:12:16 2005. I still say they shoulda kept the V and run more A trains rather than cut back the V and run A/C at partial service And screw CPW local riders? Maximum TPH on the A is 15. The combined service today is 18 THP. Everybody wins here. However, 10 car C trains should be run until the C can run it's full rush hour service. |
|
(46589) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 14:36:14 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 13:29:21 2005. I just saad that to demonstrate that at no time did the people running the subway feel more service was ever needed on the CPW local on weekends, even 60 years ago, when Saturday was a work day for most people. 10 car C trains would ease the problem somewhat. |
|
(46595) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 14:40:27 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 14:36:14 2005. Schedules have not remained constant for 70 years. When Saturday was a work day, trains ran more frequently on Saturdays. |
|
(46603) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Feb 2 14:52:33 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 14:32:16 2005. My (C) this morning was JAM PACKED! Maybe there had been a delay in service because the station was pretty crowded. But in any event, the extra two cars would have made a huge difference. |
|
(46613) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 15:12:06 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 14:32:16 2005. Ok, but yeah I agree on the 10-car trains. It's just poor planning to make the C only 8cars long when they know it is going to run w/delays. |
|
(46664) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by Eric B on Wed Feb 2 17:33:22 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by David of Broadway on Tue Feb 1 21:56:03 2005. That was what I heard from a TSS before. They said the hard wiring of the system to Canal, would cause them to lose control of those switches, but I guess they found a way to do it without losing control; or the source of that rumor only assumed that. |
|
(46692) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 17:57:50 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 11:34:22 2005. Or they could add 6 more cars overall then they could run 7 ten car trains per hour. |
|
(46700) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by vengence on Wed Feb 2 18:03:07 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 11:47:15 2005. No ..it doesn't....It can be done AND was once proposed by the TA itself.... It SHOULD be built... |
|
(46726) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Broadway Junction on Wed Feb 2 18:48:01 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 14:32:16 2005. How would CPW local riders be screwed? As long as the extra B's continue running, they should be fine... |
|
(46740) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 19:11:29 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by vengence on Wed Feb 2 18:03:07 2005. There are other terminals where these track extensions to increase capacity are needed more, like Flatbush Ave on the IRT or 8th Ave on the L. |
|
(46743) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 19:14:54 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Broadway Junction on Wed Feb 2 18:48:01 2005. Hahahahaha.....oh wait you're serious? I rode the B yesterday in the heart of the morning rush. I haven't seen crush loading and door holding like that anywhere else except Queens Blvd and Lexington Ave. |
|
(46746) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 19:18:29 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 19:14:54 2005. Wow the R40S taking a pounding, at least it wasn't an R68A. |
|
(46794) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Broadway Junction on Wed Feb 2 20:49:47 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 19:14:54 2005. Then clearly they weren't running enough of them. |
|
(46796) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by AcelaExpress2005 - R160 on Wed Feb 2 20:52:44 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 14:32:16 2005. However, 10 car C trains should be run until the C can run it's full rush hour service.I concur. I'm actually a daily straphanger on the A/C Lines, going to Euclid Avenue. The 8-car trains aren't bad, but, being the service is slowly regaining "normal" service, longer trains should apply to the C ... for now. Acela |
|
(46807) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Feb 2 21:07:31 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by David of Broadway on Tue Feb 1 18:39:57 2005. Rats! I only got one photo.Well, if it's any consolation, I got 0 photos ;-) |
|
(46813) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 21:18:49 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Feb 2 21:07:31 2005. I should clarify that my only photo was an interior rollsign photo -- nothing terribly exciting.I did hang out briefly at York waiting for a photo op, but I left when a homeless gentleman began to yell at me for informing a T/O that he had walked past the end of the platform. |
|
(46830) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 21:34:26 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 21:18:49 2005. I woulda yelled back at him to screw himself afterall why should you have to listen to some bum. |
|
(46836) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Feb 2 21:42:18 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 21:34:26 2005. Serves the bum right. |
|
(46839) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 21:53:22 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 21:34:26 2005. I try to avoid arguing with the insane, although I'm occasionally forced into it at work. |
|
(46844) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 22:17:13 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 21:53:22 2005. Ok, true. Then again if you had to leave you may as well leave a final statment to the bum: "F u you pile of douche!" |
|
(47026) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by (H) Rockaway Shuttle on Thu Feb 3 14:24:37 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by H.S.Relay on Wed Feb 2 06:41:21 2005. Yes, there is a punch N/B, but many T/Os choose not to use it. They'd rather get on the radio and cry about not having a lineup. Which is odd, considering that according to school car even if you have a lineup, if there is a punch it is to be used. |
|
(47027) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by (H) Rockaway Shuttle on Thu Feb 3 14:26:05 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Feb 2 06:30:00 2005. If the A was running local, then yes, it would be on. |
|
(47042) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Feb 3 15:17:41 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by (H) Rockaway Shuttle on Thu Feb 3 14:26:05 2005. True as for Saturday. But what happened last Tuesday? The train ran express. |
|
(47091) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Feb 3 17:20:33 2005, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Broadway Junction on Wed Feb 2 20:49:47 2005. 10 B's don't make up for 16 combined B/C's. |
|
(47098) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by H.S.Relay on Thu Feb 3 17:28:08 2005, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Eric B on Wed Feb 2 17:33:22 2005. Was it the same TSS who walked away from his post at the entrance to an absolute block? |
|
(307474) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Wed Sep 6 17:36:19 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Feb 2 21:07:31 2005. I got about 20 or 30 |
|
(307478) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Sep 6 18:00:02 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Wed Sep 6 17:36:19 2006. NECRO POST! |
|
(307480) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Sep 6 18:08:49 2006, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Feb 2 13:12:16 2005. |
|
(307497) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by New Brunswick Station on Wed Sep 6 18:54:00 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Feb 2 19:11:29 2005. true. |
|
(307500) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by joe c on Wed Sep 6 19:15:56 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by New Brunswick Station on Wed Sep 6 18:54:00 2006. Dude,this is from last year.til next time |
|
(307501) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by 33rd Street on Wed Sep 6 19:26:44 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Sep 6 18:00:02 2006. INDEED! |
|
(307513) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by metropod on Wed Sep 6 20:01:20 2006, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Sep 6 18:08:49 2006. and you dug up a year and 1/2 old thread to say that? |
|
(307517) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by joe c on Wed Sep 6 20:15:39 2006, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by metropod on Wed Sep 6 20:01:20 2006. Somewhat said the samething to New Brunswick Station.til next time |
|
(307530) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Sep 6 21:32:05 2006, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by metropod on Wed Sep 6 20:01:20 2006. RULE 1: Before accusing, get facts straight. |
|
(307543) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Wed Sep 6 21:50:36 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Sep 6 18:00:02 2006. I was looking for an old thread and came across that one.I never did find the thread I was looking for... |
|
(307547) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Sep 6 21:52:25 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Wed Sep 6 21:50:36 2006. My bad. |
|
(307549) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Sep 6 21:53:11 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Wed Sep 6 21:50:36 2006. 'I never did find the thread I was looking for...' perhaps attached to a needle in a haystack? |
|
(307586) | |
Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!) |
|
Posted by Sa-Ceu! on Thu Sep 7 00:44:07 2006, in response to Re: PHOTO PROFF (Was: Re: C returning tomorrow!!!), posted by Kriston Lewis on Wed Sep 6 21:32:05 2006. I'll admit i saw yours first. |
|
(307588) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Thu Sep 7 00:50:55 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Sep 6 18:00:02 2006. How do you find these old posts? |
|
(307620) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Sep 7 06:52:00 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Thu Sep 7 00:50:55 2006. GOOGLE or by typing in random post numbers... |
|
(307621) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Sep 7 06:54:24 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by monorail on Wed Sep 6 21:53:11 2006. Sometimes it's easier to find that needle! |
|
(307626) | |
Re: C returning tomorrow!!! |
|
Posted by GIS Man on Thu Sep 7 08:07:14 2006, in response to Re: C returning tomorrow!!!, posted by 33rd Street on Wed Sep 6 19:26:44 2006. A Stargate SG-1 fan?Bob Sklar |
|
Page 3 of 3 |