|
|
| if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK (170413) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (170413) | |
if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005 ........if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICKPhoto ID: 185149 Full Size Railroad: LACMTA los angeles MTA Locomotive: Siemens P 2000 Location: Mission Station South Pasadena Station City/State: South Pasadena Station LACMTA Gold Line Mission Station, California, USA Locomotive Number: 301 Train ID: 301 Remarks: South Pasadena Station LACMTA Gold Line Mission Station  ............................................................... |
|
|
| (170415) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 14 05:52:55 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. Nice photo, but I'm beginning to think that YOU are sick - obsessed with that site. :Dyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (170416) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:55:33 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 14 05:52:55 2005. nah ....................just trying to C what happens i have other places to load photos to folks who like em ............ thankz fred do not worry i am not losin' it lol |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (170423) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 06:25:32 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. i dont know folks photo is LEVEL train is perfectly LIGHTINGthe photo is RAZOR SHARP CLEAR what and where did i miss on this photo ? ............................................. i just wanted to C what they intend to do with this beauty |
|
|
| (170430) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Mon Nov 14 07:21:30 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 14 05:52:55 2005. 8-) |
|
|
| (170449) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:50:31 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. Results!!they rejected this photo ...................do you agree ? Photo Submission Results: Photo ID 185149 was rejected from the database. Railroad: LACMTA los angeles MTA Locomotive: Siemens P 2000 Screener Comments: Poor Lighting ..WWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTT? Reason(s) for Rejection:...Screener Comments: Poor Lighting???? » http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=185149 » Appeal Rejection: http://www.railpictures.net/members/appeal.php?id=185149 |
|
|
| (170450) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 14 08:52:21 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:50:31 2005. They don't like the shady side of a train.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (170452) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:59:14 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 14 08:52:21 2005. right !!check this out ........this is the only time you can get light on the front in the morning hours at that station which is a kinda slanted / like this with east to the right of the photo and west behind a building with definate shadow it is impossible to get light all over the train at anytime morning noon or afternoon maybe a cloudy day with step up on your camera with polorized lighting ( even soft light ) then you have to ''pump up the volume'' on your camera exposure to comp for the lower lighting the entire line is almost impossible to get correct lighting except that special time of day ......................................................... i aint that picky ....... i think i have made my point railpictures.net is full of Sh---------T .............!!!! and they have thier special ''pet photographers'' like another site i know ...............no comment on that one |
|
|
| (170453) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:59:17 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 14 08:52:21 2005. right !!check this out ........this is the only time you can get light on the front in the morning hours at that station which is a kinda slanted / like this with east to the right of the photo and west behind a building with definate shadow it is impossible to get light all over the train at anytime morning noon or afternoon maybe a cloudy day with step up on your camera with polorized lighting ( even soft light ) then you have to ''pump up the volume'' on your camera exposure to comp for the lower lighting the entire line is almost impossible to get correct lighting except that special time of day ......................................................... i aint that picky ....... i think i have made my point railpictures.net is full of Sh---------T .............!!!! and they have thier special ''pet photographers'' like another site i know ...............no comment on that one |
|
|
| (170503) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Mon Nov 14 10:40:28 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. 1) Reflections on the glass2) Shadows on the ballast 3) Distracting wires overhead 4) Distracting light fixtures 5) Railnet doesn't like you 6) All of the Above ☺) Good Picture otherwise, keep up the good work. ☻) You have been placed in this world to please yourself, not Railnet. |
|
|
| (170508) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 14 10:47:47 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Broadway Lion on Mon Nov 14 10:40:28 2005. 7) Noticable dirt on windshield with windshield wiper mark...:) |
|
|
| (170509) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 14 10:48:41 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 14 05:52:55 2005. I think all of you who try and submit photos to that site are a bit into S&M, or at least a glutton for punishment..... |
|
|
| (170510) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Richmond Parkway on Mon Nov 14 10:50:15 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. I seriously think that RP.net has a filter that automatically blocks certain users who consistantly send in material which they find unsuitable to their tastes. Perhaps a "salaamallah@hotmail.net" filter that generates a random rejection comment? |
|
|
| (170524) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Mon Nov 14 11:21:05 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:55:33 2005. No, you lost it a long, long time ago. |
|
|
| (170526) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Mon Nov 14 11:22:43 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:50:31 2005. Yes, I agree, you suck. Now stop posting all this crap, we all know Railpics.net sucks, you're preaching to the fucking choir. |
|
|
| (170529) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Mon Nov 14 11:25:31 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:59:14 2005. Just a suggestion.Pick a spot that has enough sunlight to eliminate any shadows, especially at a station. Take a 3/4 "roster shot". Don't do any "artsy-crafty" shot tricks, just a plain roster shot. Sent that to them. If they reject that, then they do have an e-mail filter. Use another free web mail service to send it. |
|
|
| (170531) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Mon Nov 14 11:33:55 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Richmond Parkway on Mon Nov 14 10:50:15 2005. ..or, maybe, just maybe they read this site and see all the negative comments he has towards them?Peace, ANDEE |
|
|
| (170532) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Richmond Parkway on Mon Nov 14 11:37:49 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Mon Nov 14 11:33:55 2005. That too. |
|
|
| (170610) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Mon Nov 14 14:22:58 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 14 10:48:41 2005. Not me, I send a photo once and I'm done with it. Maybe a few I touched up a bit and resent, and I only ever appealed twice (out of probably two hundred or more submissions). |
|
|
| (170612) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Mon Nov 14 14:24:43 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:50:31 2005. Sun's on the wrong side. Good photo yes, but not really what they're looking for - maybe if it was something rare or unusual they might let the backlighting go, but not for common power which is what I presume that is. |
|
|
| (170702) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 16:34:42 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Richmond Parkway on Mon Nov 14 11:37:49 2005. i am not the only one who flamed emwho is on this site thst belongs to them hiding where under what rock or cave ? |
|
|
| (170703) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 16:35:12 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 14 10:47:47 2005. ha ha ha.............lol yep ! |
|
|
| (170705) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 16:37:03 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 14 10:48:41 2005. i remember steve hoskins hated the site ................ oh well i had to test em ''2'' '''c''' '''4'' myself .......... i would have accepted my shots and many others they rejected ........ ! |
|
|
| (170716) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Mon Nov 14 17:10:29 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. I love the picture but the sun is shining right on the front of the car. They don't like that sun angle. |
|
|
| (170785) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 14 18:41:39 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Mon Nov 14 14:22:58 2005. Maybe a few I touched up a bit and resent, and I only ever appealed twice (out of probably two hundred or more submissionsHow many were accepted by them out of those 200? |
|
|
| (170788) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by ALSTOM R160A on Mon Nov 14 18:44:39 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 08:50:31 2005. The sun is on the wrong side. |
|
|
| (170794) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Richmond Parkway on Mon Nov 14 18:49:39 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. You know what'd be funny?If next time you submit an image, they simply say . . . "Reason For Rejection: Um, because you're Salaam? LOL" |
|
|
| (170968) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Jersey Mike on Mon Nov 14 21:17:18 2005, in response to if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 05:49:17 2005. Its backlit. Why do you seem to be incapable of taking high quality photos? You know what they want to try to take those kinds of photographs. |
|
|
| (170981) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 21:25:35 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Richmond Parkway on Mon Nov 14 18:49:39 2005. i think you got it nailed here is my next submission  BET THEY SAY TRAIN IS INCORRECTLY LIT ?? |
|
|
| (170986) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 21:30:01 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by R PansePCC on Mon Nov 14 17:10:29 2005. well thats where the sun is in the morning hours and if you tryafternoon shots the sun lights up the back of that building and blocks it out oh well try high noon ? maybe |
|
|
| (170988) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 21:33:02 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Jersey Mike on Mon Nov 14 21:17:18 2005. i set it only slightly high or maybe too high on infranview photoshop ?....... same photo at 800 x 600 is this too ''backlit'' ........ your opinion please
|
|
|
| (170989) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Mon Nov 14 21:34:19 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 21:33:02 2005. It's too backlit; too much shadowline across the left-side windows. |
|
|
| (171001) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 22:00:29 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Dave on Mon Nov 14 21:34:19 2005. i could re photo shop it brighter.......? its that 'yellow-jacket-look' they have here lacmta |
|
|
| (171089) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 15 03:06:26 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 22:00:29 2005. The problem is that you need to take photos with the sun at YOUR back. |
|
|
| (171090) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 15 04:17:11 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 15 03:06:26 2005. actually the morning hours at that station is as close as you canget thier is no direct ''sun-at-your-back`'' ... at this station not except the end of the train you cannot reach up into the sky and adj the sun to youre needs lol even on marmion way the sun shines on the front of the inbound to pasadena trains only during the morining hours but it is never an exact ideal ............
|
|
|
| (171091) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 15 04:18:03 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 15 03:06:26 2005. actually the morning hours at that station is as close as you canget thier is no direct ''sun-at-your-back`'' ... at this station not except the end of the train you cannot reach up into the sky and adj the sun to youre needs lol even on marmion way the sun shines on the front of the inbound to pasadena trains only during the morining hours but it is never an exact ideal ............like below ^^^^ see ? the lighting in the morning is at angle only |
|
|
| (171142) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Tue Nov 15 10:28:26 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 14 21:25:35 2005. Is that on Marmion Way? Nothing much to keep a car from encroaching onto the Gold Line tracks (then again, that is pretty much the case for the Blue Line on Washington Blvd and Long Beach Blvd). |
|
|
| (171199) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 15 12:57:48 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 15 04:18:03 2005. Yeah, life isn't fair, bummer. |
|
|
| (173247) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Sun Nov 20 02:43:19 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 14 18:41:39 2005. 74.Greenberger has me beat, he has 85. |
|
|
| (173261) | |
Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Nov 20 05:25:11 2005, in response to Re: if RAILPICTURES.NET rejects this photo......they are SICK, posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 15 12:57:48 2005. RIGHT |
|
|
