Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is (165876) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 3 of 4 |
(166447) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Nov 7 22:34:37 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Nov 7 22:32:55 2005. I'll tell you the whole story sometime. Once upon a time ... |
|
(166485) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005, in response to rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 00:07:50 2005. By-the-way, I can't seem to get ANY photos submitted to Railpictures.After I fill out the form and click "Add Photo" a page appears that reads "Bad user data." So much for that... |
|
(166495) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Nov 7 22:56:01 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005. Make sure you attach your photo first. |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(166509) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Mon Nov 7 23:01:25 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005. You must be a bad user, then. Bad, bad user. Go and repent. |
|
(166519) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by ALSTOM R160A on Mon Nov 7 23:07:11 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 18:09:13 2005. And I'm sure many people support the site and give it money. |
|
(166598) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 00:35:24 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005. I've never had that error before, even with Firefox. I'd be interested to hear more about it...You could try registering and posting about it on their forum. |
|
(166600) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 00:41:49 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Nov 7 22:32:55 2005. I thought they would've rejected it for "bad angle" because of how and where it was taken. David took a shot of a MoD consist coming out of the tunnel at Grand Central, and it was rejected for Bad Angle.Blurry was the wrong word (my bad), I meant grainy. It doesn't really take away from the total quality of the photo, though - the angle is so rarely seen, and it's still clear enough to make everything out without having to squint or look for stuff. Interesting about it almost being published...I'd love to hear why you turned them down... |
|
(166611) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 01:29:56 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Nov 7 22:27:28 2005. he he he he he he he he he he he......... only when someone "F" with me 1st !! self defense |
|
(166613) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 01:31:19 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Mon Nov 7 12:18:41 2005. aint that a ''bitch'' they took a G train photo ...........k......that aint fair oh well nice shot |
|
(166639) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Nov 8 04:52:31 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by ALSTOM R160A on Mon Nov 7 17:55:14 2005. That's why he STOPED posting. I would like to see some proff.Peace, ANDEE |
|
(166640) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 05:23:01 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Nov 8 04:52:31 2005. look nut i will not post his name or handle eitherhe is a nice fellah and i agreed with him about you and few number of posters .............lol not going to lower myself to your sewage he he he he he nah !! this man seemed very nice to me and was very supportative of my photographers rights he also told me of another poster on this board who i will not name his handle who was HANDCUFFED for photographing new jersey trains and rolling stocks.. shame on new jersey !! this dude takes some of the finest photos i have ever seen he is also a poster on this forum and i will not tell ...................................................... what does ''subwaysurf-andee'' ever do except drink MD-20-20- |
|
(166749) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by Deaks on Tue Nov 8 11:25:14 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 17:40:48 2005. ....typical white male when he does not get his way....Ya just can't help it, can you? Fool. |
|
(166754) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by aem7ac on Tue Nov 8 11:33:42 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Deaks on Tue Nov 8 11:25:14 2005. Deaks, why you so mudey? How are the Deltics doing? :) Last I heard the D9000 Locomotive Group went under. None of the Deltics went for scrap I hope?AEM7AC |
|
(166902) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 16:11:32 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Deaks on Tue Nov 8 11:25:14 2005. just tellin him to look at HIMSELF in da' mirror..........do you like what you see ? i hope so !! lol |
|
(166941) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:08:16 2005, in response to Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Mon Nov 7 21:03:26 2005. If my "having fun" has really gone too far and is bothering you all then I sincerely apologize and promise to do it only in the OT Chat forum and never here from this moment on. |
|
(166954) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:24:20 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:08:16 2005. Why can't you have fun like the rest of us in all three forums without crossing the lines of good taste and netiquette that you cross quite often? |
|
(166961) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 17:33:00 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005. Hm, it doesn't work with FireFox but it works with other browsers.I've submitted 3 photos. |
|
(166972) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:52:54 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:24:20 2005. This is off topic. If you want we can continue this discussion in the OT forum. I will not talk about it here though. |
|
(166973) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:53:34 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:52:54 2005. You're just scared. |
|
(166977) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:01:59 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:53:34 2005. Exactly. |
|
(166979) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:02:17 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 17:33:00 2005. Good luck. |
|
(166981) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 18:03:40 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:02:17 2005. Heh, 2 of them were already rejected - "Bad lighting" and "Incorrect image dimensions."But I'm not going to whine about it - I'm going to try again. |
|
(166996) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:14:58 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 18:03:40 2005. Good for you. If only ppl can be more mature about being shot down like that. |
|
(167011) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:36:29 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 17:33:00 2005. It should work with Firefox. They recently did a big round of improvements to the site's code and random stuff and it now works for me on Firefox (it NEVER did before). I don't know why you're having that problem. |
|
(167013) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:40:21 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 18:03:40 2005. "Incorrect image dimensions" is an actual reason now? You've gotta be $#!++!ng me. I recall a few occasions where one or more of the screeners were being really strict about 4:3 dimensions (800x600, 1200x900, 1024x768, etc.), but I never thought they'd actually add that to the database as a reason! Wow. Well I guess you could try cropping it as long as it won't ruin the image. I've gotten used to cropping all my photos to 4:3 as much as possible, just for consistency's sake - it's easier to set up a block of random images somewhere or to spit out a bunch of <img> tags with dimensions when the images are all the same width:height ratio. It's a PITA when they're different sizes cause they get stretched or compressed in a standard-sized random image block. |
|
(167030) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 19:06:32 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:53:34 2005. OK, then. Meet me in the OT Board now. |
|
(167033) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:17:47 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 19:06:32 2005. You're an idiot. |
|
(167044) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:41:37 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:40:21 2005. Why are you specifying the img dimensions in the HTML code? |
|
(167051) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:48:37 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:40:21 2005. I submitted an 877x736 photo. The only reason I used this FUBAR size was to crop out some of the people to the left of the train (as I knew that they'd probably have a hissy fit about that...)Anyhow, I resubmitted it at 1024x768, but left the people in. Haven't gotten a response yet. I also submitted a different photo of an R62A but accidentally listed it as "Amtrak." I re-submitted it under "New York City Transit" and guess which one got in? The "Amtrak" one. Here it is: |
|
(167062) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:55:06 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:48:37 2005. You can submit changes to the caption info. |
|
(167063) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:56:24 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:55:06 2005. Done. |
|
(167203) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 21:57:21 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005. i was lucky with a few that i thought were not actually my best |
|
(167239) | |
Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO! |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:12:43 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 19:06:32 2005. It's a message board for godsake, it's not in real time! |
|
(167251) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:21:39 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:48:37 2005. Sweet. I had to think for a minute where that was, but it looks like 103rd. |
|
(167252) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 22:22:36 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:21:39 2005. Yeah, it's 103rd, viewed from the front end of the Flushing-bound platform.You can see the "flying express" track in the background. |
|
(167255) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Tue Nov 8 22:23:47 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:41:37 2005. So browsers can lay out the page while they're still connecting to the server to download the images themselves. That's the way it should be done, although I don't bother with it anymore. |
|
(167257) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:24:10 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:41:37 2005. Posting here is a good example...or on any message board...vs. Now when posting a large number of photos, it can be annoying when the images have different dimensions. |
|
(167260) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 22:26:20 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:24:10 2005. Why would you have a photo of such a large size online in the first place? Large photos are for printing, not for displaying on the internet. Upload only appropriately sized photos in the first place, and then you won't need to define the dimensions. |
|
(167268) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Tue Nov 8 22:32:16 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:24:10 2005. Never "resize" images via HTML. You're making everybody download the large image and then asking their browsers to do a quick-and-dirty resampling. Resize them properly on the server -- the results will look better and will download faster. |
|
(167308) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:34 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by David of Broadway on Tue Nov 8 22:32:16 2005. You're probably right. Call me lazy. If I really wanted to do something I'd just put them in a gallery where they belong, and post thumbnailed links. |
|
(167309) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:46 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 22:26:20 2005. The image is a whopping 67K. |
|
(167314) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 00:17:29 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:46 2005. .......1600 x 1200 ...........HUGE ! |
|
(167318) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by AcelaExpress2005 on Wed Nov 9 01:05:23 2005, in response to rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 00:07:50 2005. Owned. |
|
(167386) | |
I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !! |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 03:46:36 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 00:17:29 2005. I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!it should make it ........sigh..........oh well lets see fillmore street station lacmta gold line at night sunday operations whatcha think .........i bet they reject it .......lets C |
|
(167394) | |
Re: I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !! |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:24:02 2005, in response to I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 03:46:36 2005. Too artsy. But the undercarriage is quite visible, so who knows? |
|
(167398) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:39:39 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:34 2005. If you have access to a Unix prompt on the server, it takes about a minute to resize everything. Just copy everything to a new directory and run mogrify -resize whateverxwhatever *.If you're too lazy to do even that, then just post the oversized image. That's better than asking everybody's browsers to do the resizing. |
|
(167416) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by Deaks on Wed Nov 9 09:49:23 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 16:11:32 2005. I'm thinking of a line from Pulp Fiction. Perhaps you could guess which one it is? Hint - it wasn't a "white boy" that said it.... |
|
(167467) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 12:44:52 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Deaks on Wed Nov 9 09:49:23 2005. i have not seen that movie ..........or play |
|
(167469) | |
Re: I submitted this NEW photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !! |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 12:47:11 2005, in response to Re: I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:24:02 2005. actually it was a lets C what the resulte will B when we do ......................? ..........................! and now you C the results lets C what they do !! |
|
(167589) | |
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is |
|
Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Wed Nov 9 17:01:23 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:39:39 2005. I doubt I do, and even if I do, it's probably more complicated than just putting up a gallery (which I should do anyway). |
|
Page 3 of 4 |