Home  Maps  About

Home > SubChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 4

Next Page >  

(166447)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Nov 7 22:34:37 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Nov 7 22:32:55 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr

I'll tell you the whole story sometime.

Once upon a time ...


Post a New Response

(166485)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005, in response to rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 00:07:50 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
By-the-way, I can't seem to get ANY photos submitted to Railpictures.

After I fill out the form and click "Add Photo" a page appears that reads "Bad user data." So much for that...

Post a New Response

(166495)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Nov 7 22:56:01 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Make sure you attach your photo first.

Post a New Response

(Sponsored)

iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It

(166509)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by David of Broadway on Mon Nov 7 23:01:25 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
You must be a bad user, then. Bad, bad user. Go and repent.

Post a New Response

(166519)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by ALSTOM R160A on Mon Nov 7 23:07:11 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 18:09:13 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
And I'm sure many people support the site and give it money.

Post a New Response

(166598)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 00:35:24 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
I've never had that error before, even with Firefox. I'd be interested to hear more about it...

You could try registering and posting about it on their forum.

Post a New Response

(166600)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 00:41:49 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Nov 7 22:32:55 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
I thought they would've rejected it for "bad angle" because of how and where it was taken. David took a shot of a MoD consist coming out of the tunnel at Grand Central, and it was rejected for Bad Angle.

Blurry was the wrong word (my bad), I meant grainy. It doesn't really take away from the total quality of the photo, though - the angle is so rarely seen, and it's still clear enough to make everything out without having to squint or look for stuff.

Interesting about it almost being published...I'd love to hear why you turned them down...

Post a New Response

(166611)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 01:29:56 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Nov 7 22:27:28 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
he he he he he he he he he he he
.........
only when someone "F" with me 1st !!
self defense

Post a New Response

(166613)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 01:31:19 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Mon Nov 7 12:18:41 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
aint that a ''bitch'' they took a G train photo ...........k......
that aint fair
oh well nice shot

Post a New Response

(166639)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Nov 8 04:52:31 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by ALSTOM R160A on Mon Nov 7 17:55:14 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
That's why he STOPED posting. I would like to see some proff.

Peace,
ANDEE

Post a New Response

(166640)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 05:23:01 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Tue Nov 8 04:52:31 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
look nut i will not post his name or handle either
he is a nice fellah and i agreed with him about you
and few number of posters .............lol
not going to lower myself to your sewage
he he he he he
nah !!
this man seemed very nice to me and was very supportative
of my photographers rights
he also told me of another poster on this board who i will
not name his handle who was HANDCUFFED for photographing
new jersey trains and rolling stocks.. shame on new jersey !!
this dude takes some of the finest photos i have ever seen
he is also a poster on this forum and i will not tell
......................................................
what does ''subwaysurf-andee'' ever do except drink MD-20-20-

Post a New Response

(166749)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by Deaks on Tue Nov 8 11:25:14 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 17:40:48 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
....typical white male when he does not get his way....

Ya just can't help it, can you? Fool.



Post a New Response

(166754)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by aem7ac on Tue Nov 8 11:33:42 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Deaks on Tue Nov 8 11:25:14 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Deaks, why you so mudey? How are the Deltics doing? :) Last I heard the D9000 Locomotive Group went under. None of the Deltics went for scrap I hope?

AEM7AC

Post a New Response

(166902)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 16:11:32 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Deaks on Tue Nov 8 11:25:14 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
just tellin him to look at HIMSELF in da' mirror..........
do you like what you see ?
i hope so !!
lol

Post a New Response

(166941)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:08:16 2005, in response to Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Mon Nov 7 21:03:26 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
If my "having fun" has really gone too far and is bothering you all then I sincerely apologize and promise to do it only in the OT Chat forum and never here from this moment on.

Post a New Response

(166954)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:24:20 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:08:16 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Why can't you have fun like the rest of us in all three forums without crossing the lines of good taste and netiquette that you cross quite often?

Post a New Response

(166961)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 17:33:00 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Hm, it doesn't work with FireFox but it works with other browsers.

I've submitted 3 photos.

Post a New Response

(166972)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:52:54 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:24:20 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
This is off topic. If you want we can continue this discussion in the OT forum. I will not talk about it here though.

Post a New Response

(166973)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:53:34 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 17:52:54 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
You're just scared.

Post a New Response

(166977)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:01:59 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:53:34 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Exactly.

Post a New Response

(166979)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:02:17 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 17:33:00 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Good luck.

Post a New Response

(166981)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 18:03:40 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:02:17 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Heh, 2 of them were already rejected - "Bad lighting" and "Incorrect image dimensions."

But I'm not going to whine about it - I'm going to try again.

Post a New Response

(166996)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Tue Nov 8 18:14:58 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 18:03:40 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Good for you. If only ppl can be more mature about being shot down like that.

Post a New Response

(167011)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:36:29 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 17:33:00 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
It should work with Firefox. They recently did a big round of improvements to the site's code and random stuff and it now works for me on Firefox (it NEVER did before). I don't know why you're having that problem.

Post a New Response

(167013)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:40:21 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 18:03:40 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
"Incorrect image dimensions" is an actual reason now? You've gotta be $#!++!ng me. I recall a few occasions where one or more of the screeners were being really strict about 4:3 dimensions (800x600, 1200x900, 1024x768, etc.), but I never thought they'd actually add that to the database as a reason! Wow. Well I guess you could try cropping it as long as it won't ruin the image. I've gotten used to cropping all my photos to 4:3 as much as possible, just for consistency's sake - it's easier to set up a block of random images somewhere or to spit out a bunch of <img> tags with dimensions when the images are all the same width:height ratio. It's a PITA when they're different sizes cause they get stretched or compressed in a standard-sized random image block.

Post a New Response

(167030)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 19:06:32 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 17:53:34 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
OK, then. Meet me in the OT Board now.

Post a New Response

(167033)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:17:47 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 19:06:32 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
You're an idiot.

Post a New Response

(167044)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:41:37 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:40:21 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Why are you specifying the img dimensions in the HTML code?

Post a New Response

(167051)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:48:37 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 18:40:21 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
I submitted an 877x736 photo. The only reason I used this FUBAR size was to crop out some of the people to the left of the train (as I knew that they'd probably have a hissy fit about that...)

Anyhow, I resubmitted it at 1024x768, but left the people in. Haven't gotten a response yet.

I also submitted a different photo of an R62A but accidentally listed it as "Amtrak." I re-submitted it under "New York City Transit" and guess which one got in? The "Amtrak" one.

Here it is:



Post a New Response

(167062)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:55:06 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:48:37 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
You can submit changes to the caption info.

Post a New Response

(167063)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:56:24 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:55:06 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Done.

Post a New Response

(167203)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 21:57:21 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Mon Nov 7 22:52:40 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
i was lucky with a few that i thought were not actually my best

Post a New Response

(167239)

view threaded

Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:12:43 2005, in response to Re: Just having fun, come on! Re: OH MY GOD WHAT A PHOTO!, posted by Subway Camper on Tue Nov 8 19:06:32 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
It's a message board for godsake, it's not in real time!

Post a New Response

(167251)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:21:39 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 19:48:37 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Sweet. I had to think for a minute where that was, but it looks like 103rd.

Post a New Response

(167252)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 8 22:22:36 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:21:39 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Yeah, it's 103rd, viewed from the front end of the Flushing-bound platform.

You can see the "flying express" track in the background.

Post a New Response

(167255)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by David of Broadway on Tue Nov 8 22:23:47 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:41:37 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
So browsers can lay out the page while they're still connecting to the server to download the images themselves. That's the way it should be done, although I don't bother with it anymore.

Post a New Response

(167257)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:24:10 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 19:41:37 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Posting here is a good example...or on any message board...


vs.



Now when posting a large number of photos, it can be annoying when the images have different dimensions.

Post a New Response

(167260)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 22:26:20 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:24:10 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Why would you have a photo of such a large size online in the first place? Large photos are for printing, not for displaying on the internet. Upload only appropriately sized photos in the first place, and then you won't need to define the dimensions.

Post a New Response

(167268)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by David of Broadway on Tue Nov 8 22:32:16 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 22:24:10 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Never "resize" images via HTML. You're making everybody download the large image and then asking their browsers to do a quick-and-dirty resampling. Resize them properly on the server -- the results will look better and will download faster.

Post a New Response

(167308)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:34 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by David of Broadway on Tue Nov 8 22:32:16 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
You're probably right. Call me lazy. If I really wanted to do something I'd just put them in a gallery where they belong, and post thumbnailed links.

Post a New Response

(167309)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:46 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 8 22:26:20 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
The image is a whopping 67K.

Post a New Response

(167314)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 00:17:29 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:46 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
.......1600 x 1200 ...........
HUGE !

Post a New Response

(167318)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by AcelaExpress2005 on Wed Nov 9 01:05:23 2005, in response to rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Nov 7 00:07:50 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Owned.

Post a New Response

(167386)

view threaded

I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 03:46:36 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 00:17:29 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!
it should make it ........sigh..........oh well lets see
fillmore street station lacmta gold line at night sunday operations
whatcha think .........i bet they reject it .......lets C


Post a New Response

(167394)

view threaded

Re: I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!

Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:24:02 2005, in response to I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 03:46:36 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Too artsy. But the undercarriage is quite visible, so who knows?

Post a New Response

(167398)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:39:39 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Tue Nov 8 23:52:34 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
If you have access to a Unix prompt on the server, it takes about a minute to resize everything. Just copy everything to a new directory and run mogrify -resize whateverxwhatever *.

If you're too lazy to do even that, then just post the oversized image. That's better than asking everybody's browsers to do the resizing.

Post a New Response

(167416)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by Deaks on Wed Nov 9 09:49:23 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 16:11:32 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
I'm thinking of a line from Pulp Fiction. Perhaps you could guess which one it is? Hint - it wasn't a "white boy" that said it....

Post a New Response

(167467)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 12:44:52 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by Deaks on Wed Nov 9 09:49:23 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
i have not seen that movie ..........or play

Post a New Response

(167469)

view threaded

Re: I submitted this NEW photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Nov 9 12:47:11 2005, in response to Re: I submitted this photo to RAIL PICTURES.NET lets see if they accept it !!, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:24:02 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
actually it was a lets C what the resulte will B when we do ...........
...........?
..........................!
and now you C the results
lets C what they do !!

Post a New Response

(167589)

view threaded

Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is

Posted by R7 Torresdale Express on Wed Nov 9 17:01:23 2005, in response to Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 9 06:39:39 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
I doubt I do, and even if I do, it's probably more complicated than just putting up a gallery (which I should do anyway).

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 4

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]