W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February (1631399) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(1631400) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by gbs on Sun Apr 14 23:22:31 2024, in response to W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by W.B. on Sun Apr 14 22:17:49 2024. After more than 50 years, the R-42 era officially ends with a final run on the A train. The early days: The last day: |
|
(1631401) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by zac on Sun Apr 14 23:26:43 2024, in response to W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by W.B. on Sun Apr 14 22:17:49 2024. I rode the last run from Jay St out to Euclid and watched it leave the station. I then rode one of the three last remaining parts of the subway I'd never been, out to Lefferts. I have also since been out to Parsons/Archer. The last remaining place is 148th/Lenox. I just never had a reason to go to them and weren't very interesting for railfanning. Now that I say that maybe I'll take a trip up there to Lenox to finally finish it off.I'd given up on Subchat ever coming back, but still checked and was shocked that it actually did. |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(1631402) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Apr 15 02:58:50 2024, in response to Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by gbs on Sun Apr 14 23:22:31 2024. Nice. |
|
(1631406) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Mon Apr 15 08:16:50 2024, in response to Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by gbs on Sun Apr 14 23:22:31 2024. Wonderful tribute in pictures. |
|
(1631428) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by W.B. on Tue Apr 16 12:33:12 2024, in response to Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by gbs on Sun Apr 14 23:22:31 2024. Did anyone notice that when the R-42's (and also the R-40 slant and R-40M) were GOH'd, the replacement side doors' window height matched those of the R-32/32A/33WF/36WF/38 classes? And in their positioning, almost resembled the side doors of IRT "mainline" SMEE cars of the 1948-64 period? Why in Heaven's name couldn't they have done the window height on the rebuilt doors same as the original that were replaced? |
|
(1631438) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by gbs on Tue Apr 16 20:56:24 2024, in response to Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by W.B. on Tue Apr 16 12:33:12 2024. Of all the stylistic changes introduced in the GOH, the ugliest was the resized storm-door window. Before: After: Were the designers blind, stupid, thoughtless, apathetic? |
|
(1631441) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by W.B. on Tue Apr 16 22:09:15 2024, in response to Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by gbs on Tue Apr 16 20:56:24 2024. I ain't arguin' on that score; such changes to both the storm and side doors ruined everything. |
|
(1631455) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by randyo on Wed Apr 17 17:06:57 2024, in response to Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by W.B. on Tue Apr 16 22:09:15 2024. They probably wanted to standardize the windows between the R32s, R-38s, 40Ms and 42s. |
|
(1631456) | |
Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February |
|
Posted by zac on Thu Apr 18 08:40:27 2024, in response to Re: W.B.'s Rail Almanacs for February, posted by randyo on Wed Apr 17 17:06:57 2024. That's what I'd have thought too. The R40/42 were striking in their design but were uglified during GOH, although I get that some things just weren't practical, like the route signs. You couldn't squeeze more than a few routes onto a sign and that made swapping them around difficult, or as had happened, they ran without signs. |
|