|
|
| Re: R179 A train (1502751) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (1503313) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Wed Feb 13 15:25:01 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by Ian Lennon on Wed Feb 13 09:34:21 2019. Byford might get it done. |
|
|
| (1503334) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by MTA T on Wed Feb 13 18:25:19 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by Ian Lennon on Wed Feb 13 09:34:21 2019. There is talk of doing just that |
|
|
| (1503359) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by Ian Lennon on Wed Feb 13 20:30:13 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by MTA T on Wed Feb 13 18:25:19 2019. It's about damn time. This is the MTA we are talking about so I will believe it when I see it. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (1503442) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu Feb 14 15:13:21 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by randyo on Wed Feb 13 15:25:01 2019. Rode a 160 on the E...then a 68 on the D.BIG DIFFERENCE. Id rather ride an NTT than the old SMEE cars that are tuned down. |
|
|
| (1503445) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by transitbuff on Thu Feb 14 16:13:52 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by William A. Padron on Sun Feb 10 14:49:02 2019. Unlike library systems, there is no restriction on branches here.. |
|
|
| (1503483) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by MTA T on Thu Feb 14 20:56:31 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by Edwards! on Thu Feb 14 15:13:21 2019. Nerfed R68s are particularly shitty.Nerfed other old trains (sans R46s) are not too bad. |
|
|
| (1503485) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu Feb 14 21:03:00 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by MTA T on Thu Feb 14 20:56:31 2019. Yeah.Any B train I rode on the Brighton that was 68 was a slow crapfest. I REALLY REALLY MISS THE OLD DAYS when those trains actually were Respected and respectable. |
|
|
| (1503527) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by RBseabeach on Fri Feb 15 14:46:21 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by Edwards! on Thu Feb 14 21:03:00 2019. yeawhat a dam shame. |
|
|
| (1503528) | |
Re: R179 A train |
|
|
Posted by RBseabeach on Fri Feb 15 14:51:04 2019, in response to Re: R179 A train, posted by MTA T on Thu Feb 14 20:56:31 2019. they really let the 68's go down hill from the start.They were a few weeks old when the vandals started scratching the windows. It was easy since they were polycarbonate. Then the TA started using glass. I think the 68A came in with glass. THe glass scratching led to the acid. THen they ran out of room to scratch on the glass, so they started scratching up the interiors. By 2008 the TA replaced all the glass and installed the protective screens. THey never dud anything about the scratched walls. Now the vandals are actually applying several strokes to let their scratched tags stand out. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
