|
|
| 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols (1369045) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (1369045) | |
2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Tue Oct 6 22:24:53 2015 
|
|
|
| (1369050) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Oct 6 23:00:34 2015, in response to 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Tue Oct 6 22:24:53 2015. How did that conductor get to punch all those tickets?? |
|
|
| (1369059) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 7 00:21:13 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Oct 6 23:00:34 2015. On a motorcycle. :) |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (1369119) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Wed Oct 7 10:32:16 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Oct 6 23:00:34 2015. Tickets? What is this ticket you speak of? Steerage class passengers do not knead tickets.ROAR |
|
|
| (1369124) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Wed Oct 7 11:52:39 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Oct 6 23:00:34 2015. A lot of fare evasion! |
|
|
| (1369125) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by pragmatist on Wed Oct 7 12:16:57 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by randyo on Wed Oct 7 11:52:39 2015. Budget for cow-catchers on locomotives must be brutal. |
|
|
| (1369126) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Wed Oct 7 12:25:46 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by pragmatist on Wed Oct 7 12:16:57 2015. By the way, this full utilization of existing capacity is practiced in Bangladesh too
|
|
|
| (1369127) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Karl M, Ex New Yorker on Wed Oct 7 12:35:19 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by randyo on Wed Oct 7 11:52:39 2015. I bet the closest thing to hell would be riding inside those cars. Karl |
|
|
| (1369131) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Wed Oct 7 12:46:09 2015, in response to 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Tue Oct 6 22:24:53 2015. The Lexington tunnels wold have to be made a lot wider, especially the older ones south of Grand Central! Yes-Yes!!! |
|
|
| (1369138) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Wed Oct 7 14:54:31 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Elkeeper on Wed Oct 7 12:46:09 2015. "The Lexington tunnels would have to made a lot wider"I hadn't thought of that problem. Perhaps it would be better to try overutilization on surface buses. 
|
|
|
| (1369147) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Larry,RedbirdR33 on Wed Oct 7 17:31:03 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Wed Oct 7 12:25:46 2015. Now that's a fan trip.Larry, RedbirdR33 |
|
|
| (1369149) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Andy on Wed Oct 7 17:45:34 2015, in response to 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Tue Oct 6 22:24:53 2015. Photos such as this have been posted before. Obviously photo-shopped, so maybe good for a laugh but not real. Trains in Asia are horribly overcrowded but this is not reality. After one mile everyone outside would be dead. |
|
|
| (1369154) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Numbersix on Wed Oct 7 18:18:12 2015, in response to 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Tue Oct 6 22:24:53 2015. It's Broadway Junction. I recognize the radio tower. |
|
|
| (1369156) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Wed Oct 7 18:34:54 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Larry,RedbirdR33 on Wed Oct 7 17:31:03 2015. I just noticed the 6 running rails. Is that to allow different gauge trains to run? |
|
|
| (1369174) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Wed Oct 7 23:18:47 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Andy on Wed Oct 7 17:45:34 2015. I can't speak to whether or not that particular image is photoshopped, but that practice does indeed happen.This is Bangladesh, but I believe the same thing happens in India at times. And no, I'm not sure why it starts with a bird, the train is a few seconds in. |
|
|
| (1369175) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 7 23:25:24 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Wed Oct 7 18:34:54 2015. Nope. Because of the weight of the additional passengers, they need extra wheels and rails in order to assure a safe derailment. :) |
|
|
| (1369216) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Oct 8 13:24:48 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Broadway Lion on Wed Oct 7 10:32:16 2015. There's no room to knead them besides. |
|
|
| (1369218) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Oct 8 13:28:14 2015, in response to 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Tue Oct 6 22:24:53 2015. Not into Bombay style. These trains still do average speeds of close to 22 mph in spite of the "arrangement". |
|
|
| (1369263) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Thu Oct 8 22:49:08 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Wed Oct 7 14:54:31 2015. Yes-Yes! How many Hindus can you fit in a Tata? |
|
|
| (1369266) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Thu Oct 8 22:56:36 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Elkeeper on Thu Oct 8 22:49:08 2015. At first I thought you meant tutu, but I guess you mean this
|
|
|
| (1369267) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Thu Oct 8 22:59:31 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Thu Oct 8 22:56:36 2015. Or this |
|
|
| (1369323) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Fri Oct 9 12:46:13 2015, in response to Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by Elkeeper on Thu Oct 8 22:49:08 2015. Not all Indians are Hindus. There are other faiths represented although in smaller numbers. Sikh and ye shall find!. |
|
|
| (1369364) | |
Re: 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols |
|
|
Posted by #3 West End Jeff on Fri Oct 9 17:12:11 2015, in response to 2 Ave Subway Would Not Be Needed, If Lexington Ave Line Followed India's Passenger Loading Protocols, posted by heypaul on Tue Oct 6 22:24:53 2015. I don't think that India's passenger loading protocols would work on the New York subways. They still need the 2nd Ave. line.#3 West End Jeff |
|
|
