Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(1368608)

view threaded

PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 10:10:12 2015

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Politico New York

Port commissioner pushes Amtrak fee to fund cross-Hudson tunnel

By Ryan Hutchins
6:14 p.m. | Sep. 30, 2015
Amtrak should levy surcharges on passengers traveling the Northeast Corridor as a way to help pay for the cost of building a new rail tunnel under the Hudson River, a Port Authority commissioner said Wednesday at an infrastructure event hosted by Politico New York.

Commissioner Kenneth Lipper, a financier and New York City former deputy mayor, said such a surcharge could help pay down whatever long-term debt is needed to fund the massive project, known as Gateway. Most of the initial money to pay for the tunnel will have come from the federal government — through direct grant dollars and through low-interest loans to New York and New Jersey, he said.

“State agencies and the states themselves do not have sufficient funds to do this without the inexpensive, federally insured bonding capability,” Lipper said during the Building New York's Future event in Midtown. “In addition to that, you’re going to have to have a source of funding permanently. That would require a surcharge on every Amtrak ticket, very similar to what we do with flights that come into the Port Authority terminals. There’s a per passenger fee that goes to the crew maintenance and upkeep of the airports.”

The comments come two weeks after Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey and Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York said in a letter to President Barack Obama that they would cover 50 percent of the cost of a new tunnel if the federal government agreed to fund the remainder. They said the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey should be designated the lead agency in coordinating the effort.

During Wednesday's discussion, New York City Councilman Brad Lander wondered if Lipper was “essentially saying, ‘we’d like the federal government to pay for most of it, but we’d like to control all of it.’”

“No, it’s not that we’re seeking to control it,” Lipper replied. “I have no problem with anyone else controlling it.”

He said there was a need, though, to create a revenue stream to help everyone involved pay back the cost, estimated to be around $20 billion. The program, which also involves work beyond the tunnel, has no major source of funding — just the broad commitment from the two governors.

Jim Simpson, a former head of the Federal Transit Administration and now a board member at China Construction America, said he did not see any reason a ticket surcharge — even if it included NJ Transit trains, which account for most of the existing tunnel’s traffic — would generate enough revenue to put a significant dent in the cost. A $1 per ticket fee would generate roughly $52 million per year, he said, calling it hardly enough to cover the interest on the loans the states will need to take.

Instead, Simpson advocated a shotgun approach, suggesting the full project be put aside for now and that just one tube be built. The cost would be $5 billion to $10 billion, he said. Doing that would avert the looming disaster that has made this conversation so important: Amtrak says it will need to close at least one tube in the existing tunnel within two decades to make critical repairs.

“You can also get that project done on time and on budget,” said Simpson, the former New Jersey transportation commissioner. “You take this whole master plan project — the $20 billion. By the time you’re ready it will be $40 billion to $50 billion, we’ll be several generations down the road and nothing will get build. The most critical thing right now — and that’s why I’m here today — is to get the one tunnel under the Hudson River built so we don’t have any interruption of surface.”

The current, two-tube tunnel is a century old. It was reaching the end of its useful life on its own, but flooding caused by Hurricane Sandy as just worsened the problem. Amtrak says mineral residue left by the seawater continues to erode key components in the tunnel, and there’s only so much that can be done while both tubes are still in use. A full rebuild would take some two years, the railroad has said.

Wednesday's discussion also included a debate about whether the Port Authority would disinvest itself from major real estate and other holdings in order to focus more closely on that core transportation mission. Lipper’s primary goal since being appointed to the board by Cuomo in 2013 has been to push for that shift. He said the agency needs to sell the Red Hook container terminal in Brooklyn — prompting a fiery response from Lander — and that it should unload 1 World Trade Center.

The idea of selling the trade center any time soon did not strike Christopher Ward, a senior vice president and chief executive of Metro New York for AECOM, as a smart idea. He’s the former executive director of the Port Authority and helped get construction of the building back on track. He said, with time, it will offer the agency a key revenue source.

“Granted, a $3.2 billion, 2.2 million-square-foot [tower] was not the best building to build in terms of a real estate transactions,” Ward said. “In terms of cash flow to the Port Authority — for when that building starts to generate positive revenue within the period that the Port Authority is facing critical financial issues — is far more advantageous really to the Port Authority than a fire sale, selling off an asset today to pay for some short term investment.”

He cautioned the “trade center is very, very different than Red Hook.”

“There is no contemplation of a fire sale,” Lipper said, noting much of the board has vast real estate experience and would not make a rash decision. “I think we have ability to recognize value.

The cross-Hudson panel discussion also included Seth Pinsky, an executive vice president at RXR Realty and former Bloomberg administration official. A second panel discussion focused on funding the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s capital plan. It included Nicole Gelinas, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute; Carol Kellerman, president of the Citizens Budget Commission; Stephen Smith, an analyst at Progress Real Estate Partners; and Tom Wright, the president of the Regional Plan Association.


Post a New Response

(1368627)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Fri Oct 2 12:41:19 2015, in response to PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 10:10:12 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Sure, if this surcharge is applied equally to NJT customers using the current Hudson tunnels.

Post a New Response

(1368645)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 16:08:38 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Fri Oct 2 12:41:19 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Back in the 1960s, the federal government charged a 10¢ tax on passenger rail tickets (80¢ in 2015 dollars), but the revenue thereof apparently went into the general fund. When I hear of stuff like this, all I think is "redux" of that era and later and worse. The gas tax goes into the general fund and then gets "transferred on paper" to the highway trust fund; a scam.

Post a New Response

(Sponsored)

iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It

(1368660)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Joe V on Fri Oct 2 17:44:18 2015, in response to PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 10:10:12 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Amtrak passengers are 10 or 20% of the passengers with at best 3 trains per hour. It is NJT that needs the new tunnels.

Post a New Response

(1368667)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 18:41:45 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Joe V on Fri Oct 2 17:44:18 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
NJT needs its own station in Manhattan really. $10 billion is more than enough for something like that. I keep drawing a straight line from East End in Hoboken to a station under Houston Street that leads to the Bushwick Branch on the other side of the East River; but that's a pipe dream of course.

Post a New Response

(1368671)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Nilet on Fri Oct 2 19:57:26 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Joe V on Fri Oct 2 17:44:18 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Hence, my proposal: Amtrak creates a temporary measure (such as a temporary station on the waterfront with a ferry/bus to Penn Station) and then closes both tunnels for repairs. NJT cancelled the new tunnels, let them figure out what to do.

Post a New Response

(1368745)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 3 15:54:27 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Nilet on Fri Oct 2 19:57:26 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
So you're proposing a "no build" with respect to Gateway? Won't help Amtrak even if you forced NJT's Hoboken Division back into Hoboken in totum.

Where's the "temporary station on the waterfront" supposed to be, eh? Exchange Place Terminal has been closed for almost 54 years and there's nothing left. Audrey Zapp's ghost stands guard over the CRRNJ terminal location (thanks to Jersey City politicians). NJT does have the last waterfront terminal, but it's useless to Amtrak unless a calamity shuts both tunnels, and Acela can't use the low platforms. Amtrak would lose a lot of business if they couldn't have through service to Boston these days never mind connecting service to other Amtrak trains, and there would by necessity be no Acela service on one half of the NEC.

Trying to say that the ARC tunnels were supposed to be all-NJT, seriously?? They never were, not even with that last misguided proposal that was not able to access NYP. And nothing gets solved with the big return to the waterfront.

Post a New Response

(1368754)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Joe V on Sat Oct 3 16:45:31 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Nilet on Fri Oct 2 19:57:26 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
NJT's ARC tunnels was nothing more than a branch line to Macy's Bunker.
No sense punishing al NJT and Amtrak riders for its cancellation.

Post a New Response

(1368758)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 3 17:13:22 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Joe V on Sat Oct 3 16:45:31 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Very true.

JMHO, but for the money spent on the LIRR ESA, they could have tunneled further south through Manhattan and under the East River into Brooklyn to join up with the Atlantic Avenue Branch. You know, since the MTA wants to be so provincial and all.

Post a New Response

(1368763)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Oct 3 18:01:34 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 3 17:13:22 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Does New Jersey pay MTA taxes? Have you ever seen how large the amounts are? If New Jersey was willing to pay, I'm sure we can run a train or two over there.

Post a New Response

(1368803)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by WillD on Sat Oct 3 23:46:55 2015, in response to PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 10:10:12 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Chrisco's surefire way to graft his way to the top:

1) Steal PANJNY money from NJ rail commuters and use it for highway repairs to funnel more people into PANJNY tunnels.

2) Charge NJ rail commuters to use the tunnel that should have been financed by the money that was stolen from them.

3) ????

4) Profit!

Post a New Response

(1368804)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by WillD on Sat Oct 3 23:46:55 2015, in response to PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 10:10:12 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Chrisco's surefire way to graft his way to the top:

1) Steal PANJNY money from NJ rail commuters and use it for highway repairs to funnel more people into PANJNY tunnels.

2) Charge NJ rail commuters to use the tunnel that should have been financed by the money that was stolen from them.

3) ????

4) Profit!

Post a New Response

(1368812)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by Nilet on Sat Oct 3 23:59:37 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 3 15:54:27 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
So you're proposing a "no build" with respect to Gateway? Won't help Amtrak even if you forced NJT's Hoboken Division back into Hoboken in totum.

Hardly. The idea is that NJ will cough up the money to avoid being shut out of Penn Station— because you're fooling yourself to think that Hoboken can handle a rush hour load on its own.

Where's the "temporary station on the waterfront" supposed to be, eh?

Just outside the current tunnel entrance. Platform, bus, boat that ferries it to Manhattan.

Amtrak would lose a lot of business if they couldn't have through service to Boston these days never mind connecting service to other Amtrak trains, and there would by necessity be no Acela service on one half of the NEC.

The bus/boat bridge would certainly be an annoyance if it came to that, but it wouldn't mean the complete loss of through service, connections, or Acela.

Post a New Response

(1368832)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by merrick1 on Sun Oct 4 09:43:10 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Nilet on Sat Oct 3 23:59:37 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Just outside the current tunnel entrance. Platform, bus, boat that ferries it to Manhattan

Get some of these and you won't need the boat.

Post a New Response

(1368920)

view threaded

Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway

Posted by JAzumah on Mon Oct 5 08:13:48 2015, in response to Re: PANYNJ commissioner pushes Amtrak surcharge to pay for Gateway, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 2 16:08:38 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Exactly...the lockbox has no bottom.

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]