|
|
| M Line (1319272) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (1319272) | |
M Line |
|
|
Posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 09:04:01 2014 This weekend the M is extended to Chambers St.-OPTO. |
|
|
| (1319277) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 09:40:28 2014, in response to M Line, posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 09:04:01 2014. Ugh!! Flashbacks of a miserable time in m history!!! Where's the J? |
|
|
| (1319278) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 09:40:29 2014, in response to M Line, posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 09:04:01 2014. Ugh!! Flashbacks of a miserable time in m history!!! Where's the J? |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (1319279) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 09:40:33 2014, in response to M Line, posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 09:04:01 2014. Ugh!! Flashbacks of a miserable time in m history!!! Where's the J? |
|
|
| (1319286) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by The silence on Sat Oct 18 10:20:17 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 09:40:28 2014. There is probibly a switch that is OOS for the weekend. |
|
|
| (1319292) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Oct 18 10:39:31 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 09:40:29 2014. Curly is a victim of soicumstance. |
|
|
| (1319293) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Oct 18 10:39:56 2014, in response to M Line, posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 09:04:01 2014. Moe is back at his old stomping ground.:) |
|
|
| (1319295) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 18 10:41:39 2014, in response to M Line, posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 09:04:01 2014. OPTO? Is that legal? |
|
|
| (1319312) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 12:55:50 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 09:40:29 2014. J is also terminating at Chambers St. |
|
|
| (1319313) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sat Oct 18 13:03:08 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 18 10:41:39 2014. How long is the train? |
|
|
| (1319317) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by transitbuff on Sat Oct 18 13:18:50 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by New Flyer #857 on Sat Oct 18 13:03:08 2014. Usual 4 car length |
|
|
| (1319325) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by The Silence on Sat Oct 18 14:18:44 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 18 10:41:39 2014. The M has been Opto on the weekends for upwards of 10 years now.Since it only runs 4 cars units, not much of an issue. They already run to Essex that way. |
|
|
| (1319344) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 16:34:49 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Oct 18 10:39:56 2014. And not liking it!!! |
|
|
| (1319351) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Sat Oct 18 16:57:48 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 18 10:41:39 2014. Actually, there were plans to run the C OPTO with 4 cars on weekends and the G from Smith/9 St ran to Ctl OPTO on weekends till it was permanently cut back to Court Sq. |
|
|
| (1319364) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by jasonnyc on Sat Oct 18 18:14:39 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 09:40:29 2014. According to the Weekender, the J doesn't run to Delancey/Essex at all anymore...
|
|
|
| (1319392) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Sat Oct 18 21:28:08 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by jasonnyc on Sat Oct 18 18:14:39 2014. Typical of the MTA public info dept. |
|
|
| (1319428) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by Abba on Sun Oct 19 08:16:49 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by jasonnyc on Sat Oct 18 18:14:39 2014. That's not true,It says click for details .When you do that is says it's only for this weekend. |
|
|
| (1319429) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by Abba on Sun Oct 19 08:17:55 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by Abba on Sun Oct 19 08:16:49 2014. Whoops I see what you mean now.I guess an error |
|
|
| (1319515) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by jasonnyc on Sun Oct 19 18:48:32 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by randyo on Sat Oct 18 21:28:08 2014. Yup. And I think the Weekender would be better serving if it showed an actual map of weekend work, not the "normal" map with flashing dots. Still have the dots, but show reality. |
|
|
| (1319521) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by N6 Limited on Sun Oct 19 19:38:52 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by randyo on Sat Oct 18 16:57:48 2014. So what prevented them from moving forward on the C's plans? |
|
|
| (1319526) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sun Oct 19 19:59:52 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by N6 Limited on Sun Oct 19 19:38:52 2014. Ridership. It would be a disaster along CPW.NYCT gets a lot of flack over 480' trains on the C. The longest OPTO train allowed is 300'. |
|
|
| (1319528) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by N6 Limited on Sun Oct 19 20:04:58 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sun Oct 19 19:59:52 2014. Have they done a trial? |
|
|
| (1319533) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by Ray Jules on Sun Oct 19 20:23:52 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by N6 Limited on Sun Oct 19 20:04:58 2014. Not everything requires a trial. If ridership is recorded at levels higher than crush loading on a 4 car train, it's a no brainer that it isn't possible. |
|
|
| (1319575) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Mon Oct 20 00:54:33 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by N6 Limited on Sun Oct 19 19:38:52 2014. At the time it was planned, the weekend C only ran between 168 and Chambers/WTC and it was felt that transferring 4 car trains of R-44s would be able to handle the service. |
|
|
| (1319758) | |
Re: M Line |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Mon Oct 20 20:11:05 2014, in response to Re: M Line, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Oct 18 16:34:49 2014. More of the usual poking, slapping and name calling, eh? |
|
|
