Re: Guess the Location! (1309489) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
Page 2 of 2 |
(1310446) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Mon Sep 1 21:40:54 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by Nilet on Mon Sep 1 21:17:46 2014. "Train Dude said he was at the station here."No, he did not. He said: "76th Street actually does exist. I've been there many times." He said he was at 76th STREET. The street, not the station. |
|
(1310447) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Mon Sep 1 21:41:31 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by Nilet on Mon Sep 1 21:18:46 2014. He never said that. |
|
(1310463) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 2 00:24:03 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by italianstallion on Mon Sep 1 21:40:54 2014. Yes, but as I explained with my links, the context of the thread established that the phrase "76th Street" referred to the supposed station in this exchange, rather than the street itself.Taking advantage of that context to make a misleading statement so that one can smugly "correct" the reader's mistakes after the fact leads to one's exposure to this PSA: |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(1310548) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Handbrake on Tue Sep 2 16:54:46 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Aug 26 19:53:08 2014. Look closely, Modified Type 2 track, but no contact (3rd) rail in sight. |
|
(1310910) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Sep 4 21:24:12 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by italianstallion on Mon Sep 1 21:41:31 2014. He said it right here. |
|
(1310924) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Sep 5 00:11:43 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by italianstallion on Mon Sep 1 21:41:31 2014. Correct. |
|
(1310925) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Nilet on Fri Sep 5 00:13:08 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Sep 5 00:11:43 2014. Incorrect.But then again, since that statement was dependent on context, I wouldn't expect you to notice. |
|
(1310953) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Fri Sep 5 08:24:53 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by Nilet on Fri Sep 5 00:13:08 2014. Nope, you're wrong. Since we know he wasn't at the station, logic and context should clue you in as to what he meant. |
|
(1311046) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Nilet on Fri Sep 5 20:21:15 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by TerrApin Station on Fri Sep 5 08:24:53 2014. Since we know he wasn't at the station...How do "we know" this? ...logic and context should clue you in as to what he meant. Once again, nuance and context elude you. The relevant context of that post was the previous two, which established that in this exchange, the phrase "76th Street" refers to the hypothetical IND station and SubChat meme. |
|
(1311254) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Sep 7 00:16:08 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by Nilet on Fri Sep 5 20:21:15 2014. How do "we know" this?Fine, everyone except you knows this. Happy? Once again, nuance and context elude you. The relevant context of that post was the previous two, which established that in this exchange, the phrase "76th Street" refers to the hypothetical IND station and SubChat meme.Once again, nuance and context elude you. The relevant context of that post was the previous two combined with who he was replying to, which established that in this post, the phrase "76th Street" refers to the actual 76th Street" in Queens and the "Dan Lawrence is a moron" SubChat/real-life meme. |
|
(1317911) | |
Re: Guess the Location! |
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Oct 9 23:31:08 2014, in response to Re: Guess the Location!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Sep 7 00:16:08 2014. The relevant context of that post was the previous two...Yes, now read them. You might just be able to figure it out. ... combined with who he was replying to... No, that's not relevant. Perhaps that's where you went off the rails. |
|
[1 2] |
||
Page 2 of 2 |