Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Canarsie CBTC

Posted by RonInBayside on Sat Jun 11 23:05:50 2005, in response to Re: Canarsie CBTC, posted by Stephen Bauman on Sat Jun 11 22:54:24 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
"I gather you never got past the RFP stage during your aerospace experience. :-)"

You'd be wrong. I was partly responsible for many a pricing run that Hughes submitted for a variety of projects.


"A bid submission to an RFQ is a contractural obligation if accepted"
And if the contract is then signed.

"If the TA were to materially alter the contract terms from the RFQ, they open up a can of worms with regard to the competitive bidding process."

Tere are lots of changes you can make to a contract without "materially" affecting it. If you want to do business with the government, you interpret that flexibly, so you get invited back to the table again.

" If the contract terms are tougher on the bidder, then that bid can be withdrawn without penalty."

Sure - but then you wasted all that time on the bid, and you may have a harder time returning to the table.

You are talking nonsense here. You lied in your ptrevious post, and now you want to compound it with this foolishness.



(There are no responses to this message.)

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]