Re: (Propery Tax statement) Re: NY1: ''Straphangers Outraged By M.T.A.'s $600 M Overtime Bill (969741) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: (Propery Tax statement) Re: NY1: ''Straphangers Outraged By M.T.A.'s $600 M Overtime Bill |
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Sun Aug 22 09:55:59 2010, in response to Re: (Propery Tax statement) Re: NY1: ''Straphangers Outraged By M.T.A.'s $600 M Overtime Bill, posted by BMTLines on Sun Aug 22 09:20:17 2010. If they want bike lanes, they *had* to be applied before the surface was ripped up. The contract requires the contractor to "restore" the pavement markings. If applied later, then the contractor could and would demand more money for doing so. And if the city did it later it would not be up to the same standard as applied by the contractor.![]() |
![]() |
(There are no responses to this message.)
![]() |
![]() |