|
|
| Re: 34 PhOtOs -- PEOPLE of the SUBWAY -*- 6/6/10 (945009) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: 34 PhOtOs -- PEOPLE of the SUBWAY -*- 6/6/10 |
|
|
Posted by bmtlines on Wed Jun 16 17:11:07 2010, in response to Re: 34 PhOtOs -- PEOPLE of the SUBWAY -*- 6/6/10, posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Wed Jun 16 17:03:10 2010. The reason that the author uses "almost always" is because state laws do vary. Actually it is some of the other subjects on that list that may be off limits such as nuclear power plants, certain buildings if they are within military bases, etc. Pictures of fully clothed children in a non-sexualized context where the photographer is not focusing on a body part are perfectly legal.Ask yourself, would YOU be okay with a strange, unknown grown male or even a female is taking all kinds of photos of your children without your permission, especially to which the usage of the pictures to this person are unknown?? Having 3 daughters, I would DAMN SURE have a problem with that!!!!! That is your personal preference and opinion, which is fine, but in that case don't bring the law into your argument - just say that YOU don't like it |
|
|
|