Re: ARC to GCT (Alternative G) (879688) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: ARC to GCT (Alternative G) |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Dec 29 01:58:47 2009, in response to ARC to GCT - Why Not the Option of Choice?, posted by JayMan on Tue Dec 29 01:12:51 2009. Why was this option taken off the table, if it in fact was?Because the MTA for reasons yet to be explained backed out of the project. That doesn't explain the retrenching out of Alternative P or looking for ways to expand the first level of NYP. (Both prior alternatives gave access to NYP from the new tunnels. The current mess does not.) There's also a few potential problems having to do with electrification. While there's enough overhead room to install overhead wire in GCT's lower level, the tunnels under Park Avenue might present a clearance problem (details unresolved). Why did you call Alternative G "the option of choice"? Who was choosing it? |
(There are no responses to this message.)