|
|
| Re: Obama administration proposing federal oversight of subways and light rail (861229) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Obama administration proposing federal oversight of subways and light rail |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Nov 19 14:33:50 2009, in response to Re: Obama administration proposing federal oversight of subways and light rail, posted by rbseabeach on Thu Nov 19 11:31:13 2009. Oh Yes they would have. The difference is that the comander [sic] in chief recognized the threat in January 2001 but he knew it would be a difficult road.Yes, the commander in chief for most of January 2001. The commander in chief for the rest of January promptly ignored the previous administration's warnings and blatantly ignored a memo that stated that Bin Laden was determined to strike in the US. In any event, suppose we imediately [sic] went into Afganistan [sic] in January 2001, and we were able to PREVENT 9/11, they would have questioned why we had to go into Afganistan [sic] in the first place. Like in 1998. Maybe if Bush were president then the Congress would be concerned more with real issues like an upper class tax cut instead of how the president was getting off. Bottom line, the world changed after 9/11 and the previous administration took the position that we will pull out all stops to PREVENT it from happening again. Mission acomplished! [sic] It nevert happend [sic] again and several attacks were prevented. That's specious reasoning. Now 10 months into this new administration, we are closing prison camps, going around the world apologizing and bringing the 9/11 criminals to NYC to try them in civil court. What if they are acquitted? Why do you hate America so much? |
|
|
|