|
|
| Re: [ARTICLE] Woman Sues RR For Injuries While Taking Pictures (860808) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: [ARTICLE] Woman Sues RR For Injuries While Taking Pictures |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 18 21:01:06 2009, in response to [ARTICLE] Woman Sues RR For Injuries While Taking Pictures, posted by Newkirk Images on Wed Nov 18 05:40:45 2009. Eh.Good rule of thumb: Whenever you hear of a suit involving massive damages for a clearly frivolous claim, you'll find that more often than not either 1. It never really happened— no damages were awarded or the entire case was an urban legend. or 2. It's not really frivolous— the information establishing the merit of the case was left out of all the news reports. In this case, I would imagine that the suit will end up in Category #1, No Damages Awarded. Of course, it's too soon to say— although the incident in question apparently happened in 2006, the case was only filed four (business) days ago. 
|
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|