Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: R-32,38,40,42,44,46,62,68,142,143,160??

Posted by BMTLines on Wed Nov 18 20:52:24 2009, in response to Re: R-32,38,40,42,44,46,62,68,142,143,160??, posted by R160 8818 on Wed Nov 18 19:51:49 2009.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I wonder if they are also using R numbers for more types of contracts than they did back in the earlier days.

For example in the period 1930-1975 the R numbers are virtually sequential and with the exception of very few skips. The period 1980-2010. During those 45 years I count approximately 35 car types and the numbers ran from R-1 through R-46.

In the 35 years since there have been only 5 car types and there has been an explosion of over 100 R-numbers. Did the MTA at some point decide to use the sequence for many more types of contracts than the sequence was originally intended or used for?

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]