|
|
| Re: The F report (842462) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: The F report |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sat Oct 10 12:09:21 2009, in response to Re: The F report, posted by Andrew Saucci on Sat Oct 10 11:41:54 2009. Right, that wouldn't work. Although notice how it's floated to split late night service in that fashion. I think that adding more trains has to be a key part of the cure, since that has the effect of restoring reliability between the timetable and reality.I also wonder how difficult it is to maintain 1:1 merge with the E if the F had more short-turn terminals. So yes, not worth it. After all, not too many passengers will likely want to go from Brooklyn to Queens via Manhattan unless the service is lightning fast. There's also the pain in the ass factor, though. Going from a Queens Blvd F-only station it's probably far less of a pain in the ass to stay on the F than to go F -> E/V -> G. To be sure, I don't believe that captures too large a population, though. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|