|
|
| Re: R-160 Option III Order (841581) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: R-160 Option III Order |
|
|
Posted by brightonr68 on Wed Oct 7 16:22:02 2009, in response to Re: R-160 Option III Order, posted by randyo on Tue Oct 6 21:01:44 2009. "Feds don't have the intestinal fortitude to use any and all government sanctions at their disposal to compel the US railcar companies to continue manufacturing passenger railcars rather than just giving up on them entirely. "Lets get this straight you want the gov to mandate a company manufacture a product that will loose them money or is a poor allocation of a companies capitol? Lets start with some of the union rules that drove GM and Chystler into bankruptcy. The biggest one was that they had to pay workers a salary even when they were not needed such as when a plant was idles due to low volume |
|
|
|