|
|
| Re: KTLA CONFIRMS: But should we jump to conclusions? (681203) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: KTLA CONFIRMS: But should we jump to conclusions? |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Sep 14 15:42:02 2008, in response to Re: KTLA CONFIRMS: But should we jump to conclusions?, posted by Broadway Lion on Sun Sep 14 15:32:06 2008. So he *forgot* that he was still under a restricting aspect when he left the station, he still had the homeball in front of him.Well, do we know that he had a restricting on the distant signal? At all events, he had to be ready to stop at the next signal. Apparently they do not use track warrants in that territory. Correct. I believe that they use a CTC system for dispatching and control of the home signals. Not sure if the distant signal is controlled by CTC too. Maybe the Railroad *should* text message the signals to him. That's probably too high tech for Metrorail and the other outfits out there. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|