|
|
| Re: NJT Board considering large capital expenditure on new rolling stock, including DMs & EMUs, July (645431) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: NJT Board considering large capital expenditure on new rolling stock, including DMs & EMUs, July |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Mon Jul 7 10:56:48 2008, in response to Re: NJT Board considering large capital expenditure on new rolling stock, including DMs & EMUs, July, posted by Joe V on Fri Jul 4 18:46:46 2008. As a replacement for meeting the aims for THE project, Flushing Line extension wouldn't accomplish very much.However, with respect to the growing communities on and near the banks of the Hudson on NJ side, which aren't served by commuter rail to NY, and which won't be served by THE project, Flushing Line extension would help. But such extension would probably have to be considered under the heading of PATH expansion. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|