|
|
| Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 (645257) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7 |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoPCCLCars on Sun Jul 6 22:30:31 2008, in response to Re: Fireworks from 52 St on the 7, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jul 6 20:09:52 2008. No, I didn't read that. It is not about the topic of discussion.How could you have not read the story. It was only four lines long...it was doublespaced for clarity...and it was at the top of the post. You mean you only responded to the bottom half of the post. Then how could you know WHEN the story ended so that you would know what to partially respond to. That is...."How would you know" without reading the top half. So "not reading" is not plausible. Despite what you believe, the story DOES have an impact on the question at hand. The other part of the question you have agreed... that I am not to be bound by your definitions of amazed. Thank you suh!! As for the word "sharp" and usage of the same. I've offered a set of definitions for you to choose from. You chose....you were WRONG...I informed you of that. You can supply your own set of definitions and usages if you desire. I'll tell you if your are right or wrong. Or maybe another way.... sharp clothes sharp car sharp song sharp design sharp idea sharp pencil sharp cheese sharp note sharp look sharp scheme sharp wrap sharp iPod wrap (journal SQ would like that one)(Where is he, by the way?} sharp location sharp concept (list continues on and on and on) David Harrison |
|
|
|