Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: June 28, 1956

Posted by William A. Padron on Tue Jul 1 10:15:57 2008, in response to Re: June 28, 1956, posted by MainR3664 on Tue Jul 1 09:37:36 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Well, it has been determined that the color photo does show it is indeed a train of R-1/9's, not R-10's as I had originally thought. Many of the earlier Rockaway Line photos, that I have seen from the Railroad Avenue Enterprises collection, that showed the fleet in particular during the first year of operation most likely used R-4's with some R-1's mixed in, or whatever the "E" line car assignment had offered.

Now, if you want to see picture images of the R-7 to R-9 cars on the IND Rockaway Line, as they had been seen there during the 1960's-early 1970's, here are some examples...

R-7 #1407, Aqueduct-North Conduit Avenue ["HH" Train], 9/9/1972.

R-7 #1409, North Channel Bridge ["HH" Train], 9/10/1972.

R-7 #1498, Rockaway Park Yard, 5/18/1969.

R-7 #1518, Rockaway Park Yard, 5/18/1969.

R-9 #1662, in vicinity of Aqueduct-North Conduit Avenue ["HH" Train], No Date.

R-9 #1773, Mott Avenue-Far Rockaway ["HH" Train], September 1966.


However, I came across this photo taken in 1957 north of Broad Channel station, and I do believe that this is indeed an R-10 train in use, not an R-1/9 type as labeled in the photo caption. The evidence is that one of the side vents can be seen sticking out of its ogee roof. I will let the reader be the absolute true judge on this one...

IND Rockaway Train [R-1/9 or R-10???], 11/29/1957.

-William A. Padron
["Mott Av.-Far Rockway"]



Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]