|
|
| Re: Second Ave Alignment Change (638669) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Second Ave Alignment Change |
|
|
Posted by Andrew Saucci on Mon Jun 23 20:21:33 2008, in response to Re: Second Ave Alignment Change, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 21 03:02:19 2008. "In their hearts, they know 72nd will be the terminal for a very long time. That's why they're doing this."I think they will eventually get it up to 96 St and maybe as far as the existing completed segments go, but what is starting to be doubtful is the line below 63 St. The three-track segment serves little purpose without the lower portion of the line. Even a short turn of a Q at 72 St with two tracks is no problem as long as the T doesn't exist. That seems to be the real message here-- at least for now. We may see 96 St in ten years, but forget about anything below 63 St. |
|
|
|