|
|
| Re: Second Ave Alignment Change (637315) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Second Ave Alignment Change |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jun 21 03:13:27 2008, in response to Re: Second Ave Alignment Change, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 21 03:02:19 2008. FWIW, I remember when 145/Lenox WAS the terminal prior to the dig to 148 and "reconfiguration" of that yahd. Worked a LOT smoother, but the provisions made it a mess that continues to this day. THAT is why I said what I said about 72 on the (T) ... you guys in RTO really need to help explain this to the rubes ... but the REAL onus lies on the original design engineers to explain it again. ANYONE who's ever had a railroad die in their windshield knows why ... but obviously, the wiglets, deputy junior wiglets, adminiswigs and docudroids have forgotten. :( |
|
|
|