|
|
| Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson (620107) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson |
|
|
Posted by 156n3rd on Tue May 20 14:38:24 2008, in response to Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun May 18 19:11:44 2008. That's not a good reason to replace any "vehicle" of any type. The look represent being run down as in needing re-building or replacing. In my little opinon, I still stand by my remarks. The cras look dated. That doesn't mean I hate you or your choice of whatever. What is your favorite? I love all subways and if I had the time and money I'd travel to see the sights AND ride the trains. Bottom line, the cars in question are being used and until they are replaced or whatever, that's the way they'll remain. One last last little peep. My wife and I recently traded her 1992 Saturn SL2. The headliner had been falling, the a/c didn't work and it leaked horribly when it rained. But, for the initial 500 bux we invested, the beast drove well for over 3 years. When the time came for it to go, there was no hesitation. When equipment has failed you've got to decide whether to press on or give up. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|