|
|
| Re: London news (61193) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: London news |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Wed Mar 9 12:45:15 2005, in response to Re: London news, posted by Max Roberts on Wed Mar 9 05:44:43 2005. Southwark should not have been built, far too close to Waterloo.Or rather, should have been built a train length or two further east with platforms on the Holborn Lines above. Canada Water, did they really need this? Very close to Surrey Docks. If they could not have got the JLE alignment correct, could they have just moved Surrey Docks and made it double-ended? One of those eternal mysteries of PFI... Park Royal, if the Central Line station ever gets built, I understand they intend to keep Hanger Lane open. Oh no! But isn't there a gradient/HSE-needing-nappies problem with the Picc? Far better IMHO to stick a new Picc station at the North Circular Road (which is roughly halfway between Park Royal and Alperton) and build and elevated walkway from there into Hangar Lane station Covent Garden still irritaes many people. A double-ended station under Long Acre would serve Leicester Square and Covent Garden effectively. That sounds way too much like how the French abolished Martin-Nadaud. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|