|
|
| Re: G Train Hearing at City Hall (597952) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: G Train Hearing at City Hall |
|
|
Posted by jsun21 on Wed Apr 9 09:25:36 2008, in response to Re: G Train Hearing at City Hall, posted by KLCS on Wed Apr 9 01:22:43 2008. Well thought out. A few things I'd like to say:1) Transit has made it clear they will not be creating an out-of-system transfer between the G and the J. 2) I agree that the G is not really contributing to the rush hour needs, but I wonder why the trains you were unwilling to add were a concern as I think the E local and 24/7 R are certainly more trains then an extended G. Also considering that R32s are on their way out(still good cars mind you) I'm not sure that the E should be local. 3)AFAIK the cars that were used to make up 6 on the G went to the V so extending trains may only be possible on weekends. In all honesty the G needs longer trains only during school commuting hours(I dare you to find space at Metro Av). 4)As far as your more frequent service I'm not sure we have the cars, but I think we can pick on some odd F trains(the ones that start and end at Kings Highway and maybe two regulars) and send them up the Crosstown, this would add cars in the rush hour. If your worried about stock imbalance you can send them up the Culver express after Ditmas, or stick them behind the G going on the express tracks. People may or may not like it, but it will keep the service running. |
|
|
|