Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: TA is obsessed with CBTC, and ''New'' tech for no reason.

Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Sat Mar 1 00:32:07 2008, in response to Re: TA is obsessed with CBTC, and ''New'' tech for no reason., posted by Jeff H. on Sat Mar 1 00:08:11 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
WOW. They really think motormen are maniacs. even if you wrap it around after the last arm goes down, you will only be able to hit 15, maybe 20 miles-not enough to commit suicide with a bumper. You might even be able to tow the train away. the most that can happen is a delay for a day, and lawsuites due to "injuries".
PATH is far more reasonable in this sense.
Hah, and that replacement of AIR with Electric switches seems dumb-dumb too. They use air for the sump pumps anyways, and if it ain't broke, don't BREAK it. They can't fathom that an old system CAN be reliable, as it was for a century. Why reinvent the wheel?
I can imagine the elctric switches getting jammed, and then the tremendous currents overheating the components. Air doors were superior in this sense as well.
Also electronics don't like the damp environment where manny switches are located.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]