Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: May 11, 1975. . .End of the Culver shuttle

Posted by J trainloco on Sun May 13 19:45:13 2007, in response to Re: May 11, 1975. . .End of the Culver shuttle, posted by Edwards! on Sun May 13 19:33:44 2007.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Of course you don't like what I said..because its the truth.

Only in your own distorted mind.

Apparently,you didn't understand what I SAID..

I understood it perfectly. If there's something I said that you believe to be me misinterpreting your words, address it.

What you guys don't like..is the fact that I have a low tolerence for the nonsense ramblings of the rail fan "guru's" that post here..and speak what I feel.

What I don't like is the fact that David brought up questions that are perfectly reasonable issues that relate to the transit issue at hand, and you respond by calling him "silly".

What's even more disturbing here is the hypocrisy. Here you are, blasting people for spewing (your words)"bullshit" and accusing them of being 'wannabe transit planners', and yet, here is what you wrote a few posts earlier in this thread:

"though the idea sucked THEN..and I think it sucks NOW.

What CAN be done...is increase the D trains TPH to what it USE to be..short turn some of them at Bay Pky...
The M can be turned at Broad st..and extend the J to 95th during the Middays and evenings."

That post can be found here

By your own definition, you're posting "bullshit", and you're a 'wannabe transit planner'.

Now then, stop calling people names, and pouting just because someone disagreed with you. If you don't want people to disagree with your ideas, don't post them on here.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]