Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Increasing QB capacity

Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sun May 13 14:24:23 2007, in response to Re: Increasing QB capacity, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sun May 13 14:14:00 2007.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm not trying to say that I WANT to ride the relays. I really don't think I'd enjoy them that much. The only reason why I would want the rule to be different is if the movement of trains (such as just west of Continental) can be expedited.

I am simply commenting on and, from an observer's standpoint, inquiring into the basis of having the rule and thinking out loud as to what alternatives there are that allow NYCT's interests to be maintained without "fumigation."

The issue of protection of employees I understand well and for that reason it probably is a good idea to ensure an empty train for most relays. However, this shouldn't mean that any other thoughts regarding alternative ways to ensure safety without fumigation must be covered over as irrelevant.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]