|
|
| Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. (338727) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Nov 15 17:38:15 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 17:13:35 2006. R160 RFV = worthless.Actually, it's not the blur that I hate so much as the lack of peripheral vision. Underground, the columns between tracks act as a polarizing filter of their own, making it hard or impossible to observe passing stations on an express— and that's the best part. The tunnel vision induced by such a window doesn't mean any form of loss in an actual single-track tunnel like a river tube, but in nearly every other case it makes the view all but worthless. (It makes it look like the London Underground. Except they have no view.) I dislike R44s, 46s, 68s, and fat-cabbed 62s for the same reason. |
|
|
|