|
|
| Re: R46 Technology (was: Re: R-160 Update) (315932) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: R46 Technology (was: Re: R-160 Update) |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Tue Sep 26 20:52:45 2006, in response to Re: R46 Technology (was: Re: R-160 Update), posted by This is Grand on Tue Sep 26 16:25:47 2006. I see no problem with a Brighton-Smith connectionI see a problem with building up subway service at large cost in areas where extensive service already exists. given that Smith is connected on the northern end to a future Second Avenue line to relieve bottlenecks at the Bergen interlocking. Build a junction at Grand for Brighton/2nd ave service. IF a new East River tunnel were built for the SAS, I'd like to see it hooked into Bergen too (as well at Court St. IND). Then, I'd like to see a tunnel from Church yard's 2 outer tracks to the Bay Ridge ROW, and have the line Run east along that ROW to Utica Avenue. Run Service like this: (F)-Queens to CI, via present Route, Express on Smith St IND (C)-Local 168th to W4. then via Rutgers/Smith St IND to Church (V)-Via 63rd to 2nd av subway, then through new tunnel to Smith St. IND, running out to Utica, as described. Express on Crosstown (G)-to Church (T)-extended via new tunnel to Euclid. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|