|Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is (165973)|
|Home > SubChat|
Re: rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is
Posted by aem7ac on Mon Nov 7 08:18:55 2005, in response to rail pictures. net rejected this photo ,..my comment is, posted by firstname.lastname@example.org on Mon Nov 7 00:07:50 2005.Sallam,
If you are looking for constructive comments:
1. Faster shutter might allow you to see the destination sign.
2. Clearly that station wasn't the best place to shoot a 1/3 angle shot, since you can't see the side of the train very well.
3. As people have already said, you can't see the undercarriage and that is important.
4. Lacking in aesthethic quality is a fair comment: it's an equipment shot and doesn't show anything else (people, station signs, trees with foilage, other elements that make it more than just a picture of a train.) You should try to focus not just on the train but also what else is around it. Example:
Notice how this picture shows the bus in its natural environment, along with trees, and the USDOT building behind it. If I could improve on this photo I would have said: would have been nice if the back of the bus wasn't cut off. But it didn't matter, since the rest of the scene more than compensates for the cut off back of the bus.