|
|
| Re: $182 million Metro-North settlement (1646186) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: $182 million Metro-North settlement |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 15 11:20:43 2026, in response to Re: $182 million Metro-North settlement, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Wed Jan 14 20:58:50 2026. I didn't say there would have been a different outcome, just that we don't know if there might have been a different outcome.A civil jury found the MTA negligent, primarily because of the engineer's conduct and the design of the third rail. So implicitly they found the engineer negligent, whether rightly or wrongly. He was never found criminally negligent. That would have required a far greater standard of proof of recklessness than just "in the opinion of an expert witness, had he acted differently there might have been a different outcome." |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|